Skip to content
The Queally Foundation Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Private foundation

The Queally Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.1M
Granted FY2024still arriving
14
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$321k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$15MHealth$2.1MYouth Development$403kRecreation & Sports$248kReligion$217kEmployment$150kInternational$45kPhilanthropy$38kOther$0
02FY2024 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k3 grants · $3k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $68k
  • $50k–250k6 grants · $451k
  • $250k+2 grants · $571k
$66,090
Median grant
5
States reached
$31M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CATHOLIC ACADEMY OF BRIDGEPORT$320,975
JDRF$250,000
DIOCESE OF BRIDGEPORT - WE STAND WITH CHRIST$100,000
THE MULTIPLE MYELOMA RESEARCH FOUNDATION$83,000
INVEST IN EDUCATION FOUNDATION$75,000
RISING STARS INC$70,000
FRIENDS OF SCHOOL IN THE SQUARE INC$66,090
HOPE RURAL SCHOOL$56,626
ROMULUS T WEATHERMAN MEMORIAL FUND$30,000
US SKI & SNOWBOARD FOUNDATION$28,000
WINGED FOOT FOUNDATION$10,000
SACRED HEART UNIVERSITY$2,000
Individual grant recipient$500
AMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR SUICIDE PREVENTION$250
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 98% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%INVEST IN EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $75k → 14%RISING STARS INC: $70k → 21%CATHOLIC ACADEMY OF BRIDGEPORT: $325k → 9%UNIVERSITY OF RICHMOND: $2.0M → 22%RISING STARS INC: $70k → 6%RISING STARS INC: $70k → 21%HOPE RURAL SCHOOL: $59k → 10%CATHOLIC ACADEMY OF BRIDGEPORT: $321k → 9%UNIVERSITY OF RICHMOND: $2.0M → 22%RISING STARS INC: $70k → 21%HOPE RURAL SCHOOL: $57k → 10%CATHOLIC ACADEMY OF BRIDGEPORT: $321k → 9%UNIVERSITY OF RICHMOND: $1.9M → 22%RISING STARS INC: $70k → 21%HOPE RURAL SCHOOL: $56k → 10%CATHOLIC ACADEMY OF BRIDGEPORT: $317k → 9%UNIVERSITY OF RICHMOND: $1.9M → 22%TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY: $168k → 17%RISING STARS INC: $50k → 21%CATHOLIC ACADEMY OF BRIDGEPORT: $315k → 9%UNIVERSITY OF RICHMOND: $1.8M → 22%COLUMBIA BUSINESS SCHOOL: $150k → 17%CATHOLIC ACADEMY OF BRIDGEPORT: $300k → 9%UNIVERSITY OF RICHMOND: $1.8M → 22%COLUMBIA BUSINESS SCHOOL: $100k → 17%CATHOLIC ACADEMY OF BRIDGEPORT: $62k → 9%FRIENDS OF SCHOOL IN THE SQUARE INC: $66k → 17%FRIENDS OF SCHOOL IN THE SQUARE INC: $55k → 17%FRIENDS OF SCHOOL IN THE SQUARE INC: $55k → 17%FRIENDS OF SCHOOL IN THE SQUARE INC: $55k → 17%DIOCESE OF BRIDGEPORT - WE STAND WITH CHRIST: $100k → 9%FRIENDS OF SCHOOL IN THE SQUARE INC: $50k → 17%DIOCESE OF BRIDGEPORT - WE STAND WITH CHRIST: $100k → 9%COLUMBIA BUSINESS SCHOOL: $150k → 17%JDRF: $256k → 17%THE MULTIPLE MYELOMA RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $84k → 9%JDRF: $254k → 17%THE MULTIPLE MYELOMA RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $84k → 9%JDRF: $250k → 17%THE MULTIPLE MYELOMA RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $83k → 9%JDRF: $250k → 17%JDRF: $250k → 17%JDRF: $250k → 17%JDRF INTERNATIONAL: $250k → 17%YEAR UP: $50k → 17%YEAR UP: $50k → 17%KING SCHOOL: $50k → 9%YEAR UP: $50k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
IL
NY
MA
NJ
CT
CA
UT
VA
AZ
OK
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$17M · 21 repeat orgs$325k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +49% since the first grant, against +28% for those funded once.

21 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2024, 12 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

21
24

Total granted

$17M
$148k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+49%
+28%

Still filing today

76%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 84% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $178k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHealthPhilanthropyRecreation & SportsInternationalHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF RICHMOND
    6× · 2017–2023 · $11M · revenue +10%
  • BT
    BREAKTHROUGH T1D
    7× · 2017–2024 · $1.8M · revenue +49%
  • FO
    FRIENDS OF SCHOOL IN THE SQUARE INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $281k · revenue +231%

Funded once

  • BE
    BOOMER ESIASON FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $25k · revenue +59%
  • AM
    ALBERTUS MAGNUS COLLEGEgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $16k · revenue +28%
  • MC
    MARINE CORPS-LAW ENFORCEMENT FOUNDA FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $10k · revenue +226%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
2
Stony Brook Internists University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
3
Stony Brook Surgical Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
4
President and Fellows of Harvard College

Undergraduate, graduate, and professional education and research across a broad array of academic domains.

Education
5
Stony Brook Urology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
6
Stony Brook Ophthalmology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
7
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
8
Stony Brook Childrens Services University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
9
Stony Brook Orthopedic Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
10
Fordham University

Fordham university, the jesuit university of new york, is committed to the discovery of wisdom and the transmission of learning, through research and through education of the highest quality. for more information, see schedule o.

Education
11
Neurology Associates of Stony Brook University Faculty Practice Corp

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
12
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Sacred Heart University Incorporated; the most unlike its peers is Romulus T Weatherman Memorial Fund. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

37 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 37 of the 51 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
37/37
Grantees still filing
25/37
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF RICHMOND: $11,316,237 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF RICHMONDTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK: $567,500 · Education+14 more: $1,069,415 · Education+14 moreCATHOLIC ACADEMY OF BRIDGEPORT INC: $1,960,601 · OtherCATHOLIC ACADEMY…RISING STARS INC: $330,000 · OtherRISING STARS INCDIOCESE OF BRIDGEPORT - WE STAND WITH CHRIST: $200,000 · OtherDIOCESE OF BRIDG…+17 more: $175,983 · Other+17 moreBREAKTHROUGH T1D: $1,767,165 · HealthBREAKTHROUGH…THE MULTIPLE MYELOMA RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC: $260,000 · HealthTHE MULTIPLE…+4 more: $36,750 · HealthUnited States Ski Team Foundation: $148,000 · Recreation & SportsRISING STARS INC: $70,000 · Recreation & SportsASSOCIATION OF THE GRADUATES OF THE UNITED STATES MILITARY ACADEMY: $45,000 · Public BenefitRomulus T Weatherman Memorial Fund: $30,000 · PhilanthropyTHE MCDAVID GROUP CHARITIES INC: $8,000 · Philanthropy+2 more: $2,000 · PhilanthropyONE WORLD SURGERY: $25,250 · InternationalAMERICARES FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 · International
Education$12,953,152Other$2,666,584Health$2,063,915Recreation & Sports$218,000Public Benefit$45,000Philanthropy$40,000International$35,250

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUNIVERSITY OF RICHMOND: $11,316,237 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetBREAKTHROUGH T1D: $1,767,165 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK: $567,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF SCHOOL IN THE SQUARE INC: $281,090 over 5y, 1.8% of budgetTHE MULTIPLE MYELOMA RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC: $260,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetKING SCHOOL INC: $224,640 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetHOPE RURAL SCHOOL INC: $208,535 over 4y, 2.1% of budgetYEAR UP INC: $150,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetUnited States Ski Team Foundation: $148,000 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetINVEST IN EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $75,000 over 1y, 4.3% of budgetRISING STARS INC: $70,000 over 1y, 3.2% of budgetCARDINAL SHEHAN CENTER INC: $66,552 over 2y, 1.9% of budgetBAYLOR UNIVERSITY: $50,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetASSOCIATION OF THE GRADUATES OF THE UNITED STATES MILITARY ACADEMY: $45,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWINGED FOOT FOUNDATION: $30,000 over 3y, 92% of budgetRomulus T Weatherman Memorial Fund: $30,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetONE WORLD SURGERY: $25,250 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetBOOMER ESIASON FOUNDATION: $25,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetALBERTUS MAGNUS COLLEGE: $16,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetINNER CITY SCHOLARSHIP FUND INC: $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMARINE CORPS-LAW ENFORCEMENT FOUNDA FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetGOLF FORE AFRICA INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR DISCOVERY INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFOLDS OF HONOR FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICARES FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWATERSIDE SCHOOL INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE MCDAVID GROUP CHARITIES INC: $8,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetDOMUS KIDS INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMALTA HOUSE INC: $4,500 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetNEW YORK CITY BALLET INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSALISBURY SCHOOL INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSACRED HEART UNIVERSITY INCORPORATED: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFoundations in Education Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHANNAH STORM FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetAMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR SUICIDE PREVENTION: $750 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSADDLEBACK COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $150 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Communal FundGs Donor Advised Phil…National Philanthropi…Morgan Stanley Global…The Goldman Sachs Cha…The Valerie Ann Luff …The Inner-City Founda…The Herbert & Nell Si…The Chicago Community…Fairfield County's Co…Synchrony FoundationGe Aerospace Foundati…
Jewish Communal FundNY14.3× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Communal Fund · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · The Valerie Ann Luff Foundation · The Inner-City Foundation for Charity & Education Inc · The Herbert & Nell Singer Foundation Inc · The Chicago Community Trust · Fairfield County's Community Foundation Inc · Synchrony Foundation · Ge Aerospace Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Queally Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Queally Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 80%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →median 4%
  • Domus Kids Inc: 7% of income from government
  • Albertus Magnus College: 6% of income from government
  • Hope Rural School Inc: 6% of income from government
  • Cardinal Shehan Center Inc: 4% of income from government
  • Sacred Heart University Incorporated: 1% of income from government
  • Year Up Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Americares Foundation Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
8get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Queally Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to The Queally Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 51 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Queally’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home