· Private foundation
The Queally Foundation Inc
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k3 grants · $3k
- $10k–50k3 grants · $68k
- $50k–250k6 grants · $451k
- $250k+2 grants · $571k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CATHOLIC ACADEMY OF BRIDGEPORT | $320,975 |
| JDRF | $250,000 |
| DIOCESE OF BRIDGEPORT - WE STAND WITH CHRIST | $100,000 |
| THE MULTIPLE MYELOMA RESEARCH FOUNDATION | $83,000 |
| INVEST IN EDUCATION FOUNDATION | $75,000 |
| RISING STARS INC | $70,000 |
| FRIENDS OF SCHOOL IN THE SQUARE INC | $66,090 |
| HOPE RURAL SCHOOL | $56,626 |
| ROMULUS T WEATHERMAN MEMORIAL FUND | $30,000 |
| US SKI & SNOWBOARD FOUNDATION | $28,000 |
| WINGED FOOT FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| SACRED HEART UNIVERSITY | $2,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $500 |
| AMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR SUICIDE PREVENTION | $250 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 98% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +49% since the first grant, against +28% for the ones you funded once.
21 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2024, 12 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 84% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $178k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- UOUNIVERSITY OF RICHMOND6× · 2017–2023 · $11M · revenue +10%
- BTBREAKTHROUGH T1D7× · 2017–2024 · $1.8M · revenue +49%
- FOFRIENDS OF SCHOOL IN THE SQUARE INC5× · 2020–2024 · $281k · revenue +231%
Funded once
- BEBOOMER ESIASON FOUNDATIONgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $25k · revenue +59%
- AMALBERTUS MAGNUS COLLEGEgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $16k · revenue +28%
- MCMARINE CORPS-LAW ENFORCEMENT FOUNDA FOUNDATION INCgraduatedone grant, 2018 · $10k · revenue +226%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
Undergraduate, graduate, and professional education and research across a broad array of academic domains.
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
Fordham university, the jesuit university of new york, is committed to the discovery of wisdom and the transmission of learning, through research and through education of the highest quality. for more information, see schedule o.
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Sacred Heart University Incorporated and the most unlike its peers is Romulus T Weatherman Memorial Fund. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 35 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 23% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
37 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 37 of the 51 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF RICHMOND ↗
- Who funds BREAKTHROUGH T1D ↗
- Who funds THE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF SCHOOL IN THE SQUARE INC ↗
- Who funds THE MULTIPLE MYELOMA RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds KING SCHOOL INC ↗
- Who funds HOPE RURAL SCHOOL INC ↗
- Who funds YEAR UP INC ↗
- Who funds United States Ski Team Foundation ↗
- Who funds INVEST IN EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds RISING STARS INC ↗
- Who funds CARDINAL SHEHAN CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds BAYLOR UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds ASSOCIATION OF THE GRADUATES OF THE UNITED STATES MILITARY ACADEMY ↗
- Who funds WINGED FOOT FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Romulus T Weatherman Memorial Fund ↗
- Who funds ONE WORLD SURGERY ↗
- Who funds BOOMER ESIASON FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ALBERTUS MAGNUS COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds INNER CITY SCHOLARSHIP FUND INC ↗
- Who funds MARINE CORPS-LAW ENFORCEMENT FOUNDA FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds GOLF FORE AFRICA INC ↗
- Who funds THE CENTER FOR DISCOVERY INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICARES FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds FOLDS OF HONOR FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds WATERSIDE SCHOOL INC ↗
- Who funds THE MCDAVID GROUP CHARITIES INC ↗
- Who funds DOMUS KIDS INC ↗
- Who funds MALTA HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds NEW YORK CITY BALLET INC ↗
- Who funds SALISBURY SCHOOL INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Jewish Communal Fund · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · The Valerie Ann Luff Foundation · The Inner-City Foundation for Charity & Education Inc · The Herbert & Nell Singer Foundation Inc · The Chicago Community Trust · Fairfield County's Community Foundation Inc · Synchrony Foundation · Ge Aerospace Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Queally Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Domus Kids Inc — 7% of income from government
- Albertus Magnus College — 6% of income from government
- Hope Rural School Inc — 6% of income from government
- Cardinal Shehan Center Inc — 4% of income from government
- Sacred Heart University Incorporated — 1% of income from government
- Year Up Inc — 0% of income from government
- Americares Foundation Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to The Queally Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to The Queally Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.