Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Putnam Area Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$96k
Granted FY2025still arriving
31
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What you fund
0195% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Arts & Culture$113kHealth$100kYouth Development$75kFood & Nutrition$57kEducation$46kRecreation & Sports$35kHuman Services$26kEnvironment$24kOther$0
02FY2025 · 31 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k27 grants · $51k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $45k
$1,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$2.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ASPINOCK HISTORICAL SOCIETY$15,000
WOODSTOCK AGRICULTURAL SOCIETY$10,000
THEATER OF NORTHEASTERN CT$10,000
TOWN OF PUTNAM (MURAL ART PROJECT)$10,000
COMMUNITY CULTURAL COMMITTEE NECT$5,500
HALE YMCA YOUTH & FAMILY CENTER$5,000
JOLLY JOHN'S KEEP ON TRUCKIN FUND$5,000
TOWN OF PUTNAM (RECREATIONAL DEPT)$5,000
TRUSTEES OF ROSELAND PARK$5,000
DAILY BREAD FOOD PANTRY$3,200
NORTHEAST CT EDUCATION FOUNDATION$2,500
QVCC FOUNDATION INC$2,500
QUIET CORNER GARDEN CLUB$2,500
TOWN OF PUTNAM (ARTS COUNCIL)$2,000
Individual grant recipient$1,800
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

None of your grants could be placed against low income need for this view.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$484k · 45 repeat orgs$86k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +19% since the first grant, against +19% for the ones you funded once.

45 repeat relationships — 15 still active in FY2025, 30 since wound down; 16 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

45
22

Total granted

$484k
$48k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+19%
+19%

Still filing today

42%
32%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 61% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $38k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesEducationArts & CultureYouth DevelopmentRecreation & SportsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TL
    THE LAST GREEN VALLEY INC THE LAST GREEN VALLEY INC
    6× · 2018–2024 · $24k · revenue +28%
  • QF
    QVCC FOUNDATION INC
    8× · 2017–2025 · $21k · revenue +3%
  • UC
    UNITED COMMUNITY AND FAMILY SERVICESINC
    4× · 2018–2022 · $20k · revenue +19%

Funded once

  • WA
    WOODSTOCK ACADEMY FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2019 · $10k · revenue -77%
  • T
    TEEG
    one grant, 2024 · $9k
  • NP
    NORTHEAST PLACEMENT SERVICES INC
    one grant, 2022 · $7k · revenue +19%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Winchester Historical Society
2
Wethersfield Historical Society

The purpose of the "Society" is to collect, preserve, and interpret Wethersfield's past for the education and enjoyment of present and future generations.

Arts & Culture
3
Visiting Nurse Services of Connecticut Inc

Visiting Nurse Services of Connecticut, Inc., (VNS) a nonprofit health care provider, finds its mission in the provision of quality home health and hospice services to individuals, families and the communities it serves. VNS is committed…

4
Wickham Park Tr
5
Greater Hartford Automobile Dealers Association Foundation Inc
6
Newtown Forest Association Inc

The Newtown Forest Association is the oldest private land trust organization in Connecticut. It has been dedicated for one hundred years to securing for the residents of Newtown and for posterity generally the benefits derived from open…

Environment
7
Northeast Greenwich Association Incorporated

The purpose of the association is to provide for the protection and general welfare of the residents and owners of real property in the northeastern section of greenwich, connecticut, including the preservation of the residential character…

Community Improvement
8
Connecticut Humane Society

The connecticut humane society is the leading resource in the state for companion animal welfare, enriching the lives of families and communities through adoption services, medical care, education, and prevention of cruelty.

Animals
9
Noah Webster House Inc

The Noah Webster House Inc. preserves, interprets, and champions Noah Websters legacy and birthplace, as well as the evolving history of West Hartford, the town that nurtured him.

Arts & Culture
10
Vna Home Inc Co RVNAhealth

The mission of VNA Home, Inc. is to provide short-term or long-term non-medical home care services to people who reside in the greater New Milford, Connecticut area.

11
Western Connecticut Area Agency On Aging Inc

The western connecticut area agency on aging, inc. (wcaaa) develops, manages and provides comprehensive services through person centered planning for seniors, caregivers and individuals with disabilities in order to maintain their…

Human Services
12
Community Companion and Homemakers By Nancy and Hazel Inc

To provide non-medical in home services to aging and disabled adults and to collaborate with other area providers to prevent premature institutional placement and to promote quality of life.

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is United Services Inc and the most unlike its peers is Quiet Corner Cares. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyPrivate Membership ClubsFamily Philanthropic Founda…Independent Schools and Edu…Regional Healthcare SystemsCommunity Behavioral Health…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 35 years old; the field is 22. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number17%7%<5yr11%7%5–10yr19%10%10–20yr19%23%20–35yr14%33%35–55yr21%20%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value17%6%<5yr11%1%5–10yr19%6%10–20yr19%23%20–35yr14%43%35–55yr21%21%55yr+

The field is 17% startups (under 5 years old) — 7% of your grantees by number, and just 6% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 9% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/35
the rest of the field
9%
212/2,272

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

35 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 35 of the 83 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
29/35
Grantees still filing
23/35
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Day Kimball Hospital — $56,250 · OtherDay Kimball HospitalIndividual grant recipient — $47,400 · OtherIndividual grant recipientHALE YMCA YOUTH & FAMILY CENTER — $46,500 · OtherHALE YMCA YOUTH & FAMILY CENTERIndividual grant recipient — $45,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientQVCC FOUNDATION INC — $20,500 · OtherUNITED COMMUNITY AND FAMILY SERVICESINC — $20,000 · OtherJOLLY JOHN'S KEEP ON TRUCKIN FUND — $17,000 · OtherASPINOCK HISTORICAL SOCIETY — $16,200 · Other+58 more — $180,226 · Other+58 moreTRUSTEES OF ROSELAND PARK — $25,000 · Recreation & SportsWOODSTOCK AGRICULTURAL SOCIETY INC — $12,776 · Recreation & SportsTHE LAST GREEN VALLEY INC THE LAST GREEN VALLEY INC — $24,000 · Environment+1 more — $600 · EnvironmentDaily Bread An Ecumenical Food Pantry Inc — $12,200 · Food & NutritionINTERFAITH HUMAN SERVICES OF PUTNAM — $7,500 · Food & NutritionWOODSTOCK ACADEMY FOUNDATION INC — $10,000 · EducationREAD TO GROW INC — $3,000 · EducationTHE NORWICH FREE ACADEMY — $2,500 · EducationNatchaug Hospital Inc — $6,000 · HealthDay Kimball Healthcare Inc — $3,750 · HealthQUIET CORNER CARES — $1,603 · HealthMartin House Inc — $1,000 · HealthWomans Board Day Kimball Hospital — $500 · HealthASPINOCK HISTORICAL SOCIETY OF PUTNAM INC — $8,700 · Arts & CultureCONNECTICUT RADIO INFORMATION SYSTEM INC — $1,750 · Arts & Culture+1 more — $200 · Arts & Culture
Other$449,076Recreation & Sports$37,776Environment$24,600Food & Nutrition$19,700Education$15,500Health$12,853Arts & Culture$10,650

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTRUSTEES OF ROSELAND PARK — $25,000 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetTHE LAST GREEN VALLEY INC THE LAST GREEN VALLEY INC — $24,000 over 6y, 0.6% of budgetQVCC FOUNDATION INC — $20,500 over 8y, 0.8% of budgetUNITED COMMUNITY AND FAMILY SERVICESINC — $20,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetWOODSTOCK AGRICULTURAL SOCIETY INC — $12,776 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetDaily Bread An Ecumenical Food Pantry Inc — $12,200 over 5y, 1.8% of budgetWOODSTOCK ACADEMY FOUNDATION INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetINTERFAITH HUMAN SERVICES OF PUTNAM — $7,500 over 2y, 2.9% of budgetNORTHEAST PLACEMENT SERVICES INC — $6,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNatchaug Hospital Inc — $6,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetWINDHAM COUNTY 4-H FOUNDATION INC — $4,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetThe Arc of Quinebaug Valley Inc — $4,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF CONNECTICUT INC — $3,850 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetDay Kimball Healthcare Inc — $3,750 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetREAD TO GROW INC — $3,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTHE NORWICH FREE ACADEMY — $2,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWOODSTOCK ACADEMY — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCONNECTICUT RADIO INFORMATION SYSTEM INC — $1,750 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetQUIET CORNER CARES — $1,603 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetUNITED SERVICES INC — $1,531 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDanielson Veterans Coffeehouse Inc — $1,250 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetSafe Futures Inc — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMadonna Place Inc — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMartin House Inc — $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCONNECTICUT AUDUBON SOCIETY INC — $600 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWomans Board Day Kimball Hospital — $500 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetWORCESTER COUNTY POETRY ASSOCIATION — $250 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetPutnam Business Association Inc — $120 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds TRUSTEES OF ROSELAND PARK
  • Who funds THE LAST GREEN VALLEY INC THE LAST GREEN VALLEY INC
  • Who funds QVCC FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds UNITED COMMUNITY AND FAMILY SERVICESINC
  • Who funds WOODSTOCK AGRICULTURAL SOCIETY INC
  • Who funds Daily Bread An Ecumenical Food Pantry Inc
  • Who funds WOODSTOCK ACADEMY FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds ASPINOCK HISTORICAL SOCIETY OF PUTNAM INC
  • Who funds INTERFAITH HUMAN SERVICES OF PUTNAM
  • Who funds NORTHEAST PLACEMENT SERVICES INC
  • Who funds Natchaug Hospital Inc
  • Who funds WINDHAM COUNTY 4-H FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds The Arc of Quinebaug Valley Inc
  • Who funds BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF CONNECTICUT INC
  • Who funds Day Kimball Healthcare Inc
  • Who funds READ TO GROW INC
  • Who funds BUNGAY FIRE BRIGADE
  • Who funds THE NORWICH FREE ACADEMY
  • Who funds WOODSTOCK ACADEMY

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewett City Savings Bank Foundation IncCT36.9× affinity15 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewett City Savings Bank Foundation Inc · Centreville Savings Bank Charitable Foundation · Hometown Bank Community Foundation Inc · Chelsea Groton Foundation · The Community Foundation of Eastern Connecticut Inc · Newell D Hale Foundation · Dime Bank Foundation Inc · Eastern Ct Savings Bank Foundation Inc · R S Gernon Trust · Ossen Family Foundation · Liberty Bank Foundation Inc · The Scripps Family Fund for Education and the Arts

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Putnam Area Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 120%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 20%
  • Northeast Placement Services Inc99% of income from government
  • United Services Inc74% of income from government
  • The Last Green Valley Inc the Last Green Valley Inc72% of income from government
  • Martin House Inc53% of income from government
  • United Community and Family Servicesinc29% of income from government
  • Thompson Ecumenical Empowerment Group Inc24% of income from government
  • Madonna Place Inc20% of income from government
  • Safe Futures Inc15% of income from government
  • Big Brothers Big Sisters of Connecticut Inc15% of income from government
  • Natchaug Hospital Inc11% of income from government
  • Woodstock Academy3% of income from government
  • Connecticut Audubon Society Inc1% of income from government
  • Day Kimball Healthcare Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
12get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
4rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Putnam Area Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Putnam Area Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 83 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph