Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Eastern Ct Savings Bank Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$144k
Granted FY2025still arriving
22
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$8k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202025.

Human Services$61kEducation$38kFood & Nutrition$34kHealth$29kHousing & Shelter$26kCommunity Improvement$18kRecreation & Sports$8kEnvironment$6kOther$0
02FY2025 · 22 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$7,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ST MARY'S FOOD PANTRY$7,500
PLAINFIELD SENIOR CENTER$7,500
THAMES RIVER COMMUNITY SERVICE INC$7,500
ST VINCENT DE PAUL PLACE$7,500
OTIS LIBRARY$7,500
UNITED COMMUNITY FAMILY SERVICES (UCFS)$7,500
THAMES VALLEY COUNCIL FOR COMMUNITY ACTION$7,500
NORWICH FREE ACADEMY$7,500
MARTIN HOUSE$7,500
THE ARC EASTERN CT$7,500
JEWETT CITY COMMUNITY PLAYGROUND$7,500
RELIANCE HEALTH INC$7,500
MADONNA PLACE INC$7,500
PROJECT PIN (POVERTY ISNT NECESSARY)FOOD PANTRY$7,500
GRISWOLD SENION CENTER$7,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

None of your grants could be placed against low income need for this view.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

59%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$134k · 19 repeat orgs$93k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +22% since the first grant, against -9% for the ones you funded once.

19 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2025, 11 since wound down; 13 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

19
8

Total granted

$134k
$6k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+22%
-9%

Still filing today

53%
63%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 40% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $87k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHuman ServicesHealthCommunity ImprovementHousing & ShelterFood & NutritionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MP
    Madonna Place Inc
    6× · 2020–2025 · $14k · revenue +76%
  • TV
    THAMES VALLEY COUNCIL FOR COMMUNITY ACTION INC
    5× · 2020–2025 · $12k · revenue +44%
  • TR
    Thames River Community Service Inc
    5× · 2020–2025 · $12k · revenue +42%

Funded once

  • UC
    UNITED COMMUNITY AND FAMILY SERVICESINCgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $1k · revenue +30%
  • HE
    HEALTH EDUCATION CENTER INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $1k · revenue +85%
  • CT
    COVENANT TO CARE FOR CHILDREN INC
    one grant, 2024 · $1k · revenue -13%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Connecticut Housing Coalition Inc

The connecticut housing coalition works to expand housing opportunity and to increase the quantity and quality of affordable housing available to people with low and moderate incomes in connecticut through advocacy, education and…

2
Eastern Connecticut Housing Opportunities Inc

Eastern connecticut housing opportunities, inc. is a non-profit organization organized to provide affordable housing to low-income families of southeastern connecticut.

Housing & Shelter
3
Mental Health Connecticut Inc

Mhc partners with individuals, their families, and surrounding communities to create environments that support long-term health and wellness.

Health
4
Connecticut Humane Society

The connecticut humane society is the leading resource in the state for companion animal welfare, enriching the lives of families and communities through adoption services, medical care, education, and prevention of cruelty.

Animals
5
The Community Action Agency of Western Connecticut Inc

The community action agency of western connecticut is a private non-profit corporation serving western connecticut. its primary purpose is to operate a multi-purpose organization to combat poverty and promote self sufficiency among low…

Community Improvement
6
Community Residences Inc

Housing and programs for persons with intellectual disabilities.

Human Services
7
Connecticut Citizen Action Group Inc

We encourage Connecticut residents to participate in government and their communities and we conduct public interest lobbying to advocate for consumer and environmental concerns.

8
Connecticut Counseling Centers Inc

To provide substance abuse and mental health treatment services. programs include methadone maintenance, outpatient, hiv, detoxification and dually diagnosed treatments and counseling.

9
Community Health Services Inc

To provide medical services for the residents of the greater hartford connecticut area. to provide quality health care services to low and moderate income individuals in the greater hartford connecticut area regardless of ability to pay.

Health
10
Connecticut Farmland Trust Inc

Protect Connecticuts farmland for agricultural use by purchasing and accepting donations of agricultural conservation easements

Food & Nutrition
11
Connecticut Association for Community Action Inc

The mission of the connecticut association for community action is to strengthen the capacities of its members to empower people in need and improve the communities in which they live.

12
Community Action Agency of New Haven Inc

Community action agency of new haven, inc. offers pathways to prosperity to those in poverty in the greater new haven area through: service - collaboration - advocacy - knowledge generation.

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is United Community and Family Servicesinc and the most unlike its peers is Rose City Learning Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 37 years old; the field is 22. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number16%5%<5yr11%0%5–10yr19%10%10–20yr20%30%20–35yr14%25%35–55yr21%30%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value16%2%<5yr11%0%5–10yr19%4%10–20yr20%19%20–35yr14%39%35–55yr21%36%55yr+

The field is 16% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/20
the rest of the field
10%
158/1,655

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 40 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/20
Grantees still filing
12/20
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

ST VINCENT DE PAUL PLACE — $15,500 · OtherST VINCENT DE PAUL PLACETHE ARC EASTERN CT — $11,359 · OtherTHE ARC EASTERN CTVETERAN'S COFFEE HOUSE — $10,000 · OtherVETERAN'S COFFEE HOUSEST MARY FOOD PANTRY — $9,000 · OtherST MARY FOOD PANTRYUNITED COMMUNITY FAMILY SERVICES (UCFS) — $7,500 · OtherUNITED COMMUNITY FAMILY SERVICES (UCFS)PROJECT PIN (POVERTY ISNT NECESSARY)FOOD PANTRY — $7,500 · OtherPROJECT PIN (POVERTY ISNT NECESSARY)FOOD PANTRYST MARY'S FOOD PANTRY — $7,500 · OtherST MARY'S FOOD PANTRYPLAINFIELD SENIOR CENTER — $7,500 · OtherPLAINFIELD SENIOR CENTERJEWETT CITY COMMUNITY PLAYGROUND — $7,500 · OtherJEWETT CITY COMMUNITY PLAYGROUNDGRISWOLD SENION CENTER — $7,500 · OtherGRISWOLD SENION CENTERCATHOLIC CHARITIES DIOCESE OF NORWICH INC — $5,000 · OtherGRISWOLD HIGH SCHOOL — $5,000 · OtherPLAINFIELD HIGH SCHOOL — $5,000 · OtherNORWICH COMMUNITY BACKPACK PROGRAM — $4,500 · Other+8 more — $10,500 · Other+8 moreMadonna Place Inc — $14,250 · Human ServicesMadonna Place I…Thames River Community Service Inc — $11,500 · Human ServicesThames River Co…Safe Futures Inc — $4,750 · Human ServicesSafe Futures In…+1 more — $1,000 · Human ServicesTHE NORWICH FREE ACADEMY — $7,500 · EducationTHE NORWICH FR…OTIS LIBRARY — $7,500 · EducationOTIS LIBRARYSLATER LIBRARY CORPORATION — $7,100 · EducationSLATER LIBRARY…The Riseup Group Inc — $4,031 · EducationThe Riseup Gro…Rose City Learning Center — $2,500 · EducationRose City Lear…+1 more — $500 · EducationMartin House Inc — $10,750 · HealthMartin Hou…RELIANCE HEALTH INC — $9,000 · HealthRELIANCE H…HEALTH EDUCATION CENTER INC — $1,000 · HealthTHAMES VALLEY COUNCIL FOR COMMUNITY ACTION INC — $12,000 · Community ImprovementNORWICH ROTARY FOUNDATION INC — $5,500 · Community ImprovementOPERATION FUEL INCORPORATED — $5,500 · Housing & ShelterMALTA INC — $1,500 · Housing & ShelterINTERFAITH HUMAN SERVICES OF PUTNAM — $500 · Food & Nutrition
Other$120,859Human Services$31,500Education$29,131Health$20,750Community Improvement$17,500Housing & Shelter$7,000Food & Nutrition$500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetMadonna Place Inc — $14,250 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetTHAMES VALLEY COUNCIL FOR COMMUNITY ACTION INC — $12,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetThames River Community Service Inc — $11,500 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetMartin House Inc — $10,750 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetRELIANCE HEALTH INC — $9,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTHE NORWICH FREE ACADEMY — $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOTIS LIBRARY — $7,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetSLATER LIBRARY CORPORATION — $7,100 over 4y, 2.0% of budgetOPERATION FUEL INCORPORATED — $5,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetNORWICH ROTARY FOUNDATION INC — $5,500 over 5y, 1.8% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES DIOCESE OF NORWICH INC — $5,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetSafe Futures Inc — $4,750 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetRose City Learning Center — $2,500 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetMALTA INC — $1,500 over 2y, 2.1% of budgetUNITED COMMUNITY AND FAMILY SERVICESINC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHEALTH EDUCATION CENTER INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCOVENANT TO CARE FOR CHILDREN INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetEASTERN CT COMMUNITY GARDENS ASSOC — $500 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetINTERFAITH HUMAN SERVICES OF PUTNAM — $500 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Madonna Place Inc
  • Who funds THAMES VALLEY COUNCIL FOR COMMUNITY ACTION INC
  • Who funds Thames River Community Service Inc
  • Who funds Martin House Inc
  • Who funds RELIANCE HEALTH INC
  • Who funds THE NORWICH FREE ACADEMY
  • Who funds OTIS LIBRARY
  • Who funds SLATER LIBRARY CORPORATION
  • Who funds OPERATION FUEL INCORPORATED
  • Who funds NORWICH ROTARY FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES DIOCESE OF NORWICH INC
  • Who funds Safe Futures Inc
  • Who funds The Riseup Group Inc
  • Who funds Rose City Learning Center
  • Who funds MALTA INC
  • Who funds UNITED COMMUNITY AND FAMILY SERVICESINC
  • Who funds HEALTH EDUCATION CENTER INC
  • Who funds COVENANT TO CARE FOR CHILDREN INC
  • Who funds EASTERN CT COMMUNITY GARDENS ASSOC
  • Who funds INTERFAITH HUMAN SERVICES OF PUTNAM

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Chelsea Groton FoundationCT40.7× affinity17 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Chelsea Groton Foundation · Dime Bank Foundation Inc · Centreville Savings Bank Charitable Foundation · R S Gernon Trust · The Edward and Mary Lord Foundation · Dominion Energy Charitable Foundation · William Caspar Graustein Memorial Fund · Jewett City Savings Bank Foundation Inc · The Community Foundation of Eastern Connecticut Inc · United Way of Southeastern Connecticut Inc · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · The Putnam Area Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Eastern Ct Savings Bank Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 30%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 35%
  • Reliance Health Inc100% of income from government
  • Thames Valley Council for Community Action Inc83% of income from government
  • Thames River Community Service Inc76% of income from government
  • Martin House Inc53% of income from government
  • Operation Fuel Incorporated51% of income from government
  • Covenant to Care for Children Inc35% of income from government
  • United Community and Family Servicesinc29% of income from government
  • Madonna Place Inc20% of income from government
  • Health Education Center Inc19% of income from government
  • Safe Futures Inc15% of income from government
  • The Riseup Group Inc1% of income from government
  • Norwich Rotary Foundation Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
5rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 40 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph