How much did EASTERN CT SAVINGS BANK FOUNDATION INC grant in FY2025?

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 54% of EASTERN CT SAVINGS BANK FOUNDATION INC’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2020

studentsincome norwichpurchase foodfood pantrycoats

2021

wellnesshandicappedallow privacyveteranslibrarypurchase foodfood pantry

2022

library cartbooksrolling librarylowincomesocialveteransdental

2023

spacevoicecase managementfocusneedinglow-incomemental

2024

planterstudentspartfocuscase managementmentallow-income

2025

classessafeenvironmentadultfacilityvolunteertrishaw

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2025 · 22 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$7,500

Median grant

States reached

Total assets

Largest grants

MARTIN HOUSE$7,500
NORWICH FREE ACADEMY$7,500
THAMES VALLEY COUNCIL FOR COMMUNITY ACTION$7,500
PLAINFIELD SENIOR CENTER$7,500
ST VINCENT DE PAUL PLACE$7,500
RELIANCE HEALTH INC$7,500
MADONNA PLACE INC$7,500
THAMES RIVER COMMUNITY SERVICE INC$7,500
THE ARC EASTERN CT$7,500
JEWETT CITY COMMUNITY PLAYGROUND$7,500
OTIS LIBRARY$7,500
PROJECT PIN (POVERTY ISNT NECESSARY)FOOD PANTRY$7,500
UNITED COMMUNITY FAMILY SERVICES (UCFS)$7,500
ST MARY'S FOOD PANTRY$7,500
GRISWOLD SENION CENTER$7,500

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

None of your grants could be placed against cost of living need for this view.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

59%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$134k · 20 repeat orgs$93k to everyone else

20 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2025, 12 since wound down; 13 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$134k

$6k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+25%

+34%

Still filing today

55%

63%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 40% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $87k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

EducationHuman ServicesHealthCommunity ImprovementHousing & ShelterFood & NutritionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

SV
ST VINCENT DE PAUL PLACE
4× · 2020–2025 · $16k · revenue +228%
MP
MADONNA PLACE INC
6× · 2020–2025 · $14k · revenue +25%
TR
THAMES RIVER COMMUNITY SERVICE INC
5× · 2020–2025 · $12k · revenue +62%

Funded once

HE
HEALTH EDUCATION CENTERgraduated
one grant, 2020 · $1k · revenue +55%
UC
UNITED COMMUNITY AND FAMILY SERVICES INC
one grant, 2022 · $1k · revenue +19%
CT
COVENANT TO CARE FOR CHILDREN
one grant, 2024 · $1k · revenue +5%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Connecticut Housing Coalition Inc

To develop and advocate public policies to allow for decent and affordable housing in ct.

—

Community Residences Inc

Housing and programs for persons with intellectual disabilities.

Human Services

Mental Health Connecticut Inc

Mhc partners with individuals, their families, and surrounding communities to create environments that support long-term health and wellness.

Health

Eastern Connecticut Housing

Eastern connecticut housing opportunities, inc. is a non-profit organization organized to provide affordable housing to low-income families of southeastern connecticut.

Housing & Shelter

Middlebury Transitional Care Coalition

Emergency shelter for homeless individuals, daily community meal program and social services.

Housing & Shelter

Community Health Services Inc

To provide medical services for the residents of the greater hartford connecticut area. to provide quality health care services to low and moderate income individuals in the greater hartford connecticut area regardless of ability to pay.

Health

Child Advocates of Connecticut Inc

Recruit/train/supervise volunteers that ensure abused & neglected children have a safe home.

—

Windham Regional Community Council

Windham regional community council, inc (wrcc) is committed to improving the health and social well-being of the residents of eastern connecticut.

—

Nami of Connecticut Inc

Nami ct provides support, education and advocacy for people in ct affected by mental illness.

—

Connecticut Association for

The connecticut association for community action and its member agencies are a statewide network that strengthens communities, empowers families, promotes public policy, develops leaders and implements strategies that address the causes…

—

Hartford Hospital

To improve the health and healing of the people and communities we serve.

Health

Sarah Tuxis Residential Services in

To provide living accomodations in residential settings for developmentally disabled individuals in the shoreline area of connecticut.

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is United Community and Family Servicesinc and the most unlike its peers is Thames Valley Council for Community. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 37 years old; the field is 22. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 16% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 8% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

0.0%0/21

the rest of the field

140/1,654

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

21 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

20/21

Grantees still filing

16/21

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$122,859Human Services$31,500Education$29,131Health$20,750Community Improvement$15,500Housing & Shelter$7,000Food & Nutrition$500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Dime Bank Foundation IncCT33.4× affinity13 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Dime Bank Foundation Inc · Dominion Energy Charitable Foundation · The Edward and Mary Lord Foundation · William Caspar Graustein Memorial Fund · R S Gernon Trust · Centreville Savings Bank Charitable · United Way of Southeastern · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Liberty Bank Foundation Inc · Bobs Discount Furniture Charitable · Elsie a Brown Fund Inc · The Putnam Area Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation EASTERN CT SAVINGS BANK FOUNDATION INC funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2025

’20’21’22’23’24’25

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

1get no government money at all

2rely on government for over half their income

typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: MALTA INC.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

insufficient risk

Limited financial data in public filings.

Track record & reputation

high risk

5 years of Form 990 filings, no recent filing.

Legal standing

medium risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 061554478 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on MALTA INC, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

Awaiting reportFinancial stability— Runway not derivable from filings.
FlagSustained operations— No recent filing on record.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 2% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Eastern Ct Savings Bank Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Eastern Ct Savings Bank Foundation Inc through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

EASTERN CT SAVINGS BANK FOUNDATION INC

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

21 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Eastern Ct Savings Bank Foundation Inc?

More from the funding graph

EASTERN CT SAVINGS BANK FOUNDATION INC

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

21 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Eastern Ct Savings Bank Foundation Inc?

More from the funding graph