Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Providence Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$280k
Granted FY2025still arriving
31
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2023 to 2025.

Religion$323kEducation$127kAnimals$83kRecreation & Sports$53kHuman Services$53kHealth$50kPublic Safety & Disaster$29kPublic Benefit$20kOther$0
02FY2025 · 31 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k22 grants · $103k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $128k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$5,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$5.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PHOKOS NFP$50,000
ARTHUR UNITED METHODIST CHURCH$45,000
ALAH$15,000
Individual grant recipient$15,000
OPERATION HONOR GUARD$12,500
FIT-2-SERVE$10,000
HOUSE OF HOPE$10,000
PAWPRINT MINISTRIES NFP$10,000
SULLIVAN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL$10,000
JERSEY CUSD 100$8,000
FARMWAY$7,500
SHELBYVILLE AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATI$5,000
SALEM HIGH SCHOOL$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
ARTHUR CHRISTIAN SCHOOL$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–25, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%MIDWEST FOOD BANK: $5k → 16%HOPE OF EAST CENTRAL ILLINOIS: $5k → 18%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
IL
IN
MO
VA
MD
SC
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

66%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$521k · 11 repeat orgs$268k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +22% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

11 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 22 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
18

Total granted

$521k
$127k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+22%
0%

Still filing today

36%
39%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 49% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $142k went to new ones.

50%100%’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’23’24’25
AnimalsPhilanthropyHuman ServicesPublic BenefitHealthHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PM
    Pawprint Ministries NFP
    3× · 2023–2025 · $46k · revenue +22%
  • SC
    Sullivan Community Education Foundation
    3× · 2023–2025 · $30k · revenue +27% · 35% of their budget
  • FW
    FARM WAY SANCTUARY INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $12k · revenue +2%

Funded once

  • VO
    VETERANS OF LOG BASE SEITZ
    one grant, 2023 · $20k
  • SC
    SKELETON CREW ADVENTURES
    one grant, 2023 · $15k
  • WS
    WSS SPORTSBACKERS CLUB INC
    one grant, 2024 · $15k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Muddy Paws Farm Rescue

Muddy Paws Farm Rescue provides a loving forever home to farm animals who are neglected, abused, bound for slaughter, or otherwise need a new forever home.

Animals
2
Michigan Animal Health Foundation

To provide financial assistance to individuals and institutions for educational and scientific purposes in order to advance science to benefit the health and welfare of animals.

Animals
3
Friendly Fields Farm

Prevention of cruelty to animals.

Animals
4
Humane Society of Monroe County Il

The organization rescues animals and cares for them until they can find them qualified homes.

Animals
5
The Ark Pope Memorial Animal Shelter

The Ark is committed to providing compassionate care and placement of homeless animals, alleviating overpopulation of companion animals by promoting low cost spay/neuter programs, and promoting and improving the welfare of all animals…

Animals
6
Macoupin County Adopt a Pet

Rescue, care, and adoption services for pets

Animals
7
Bright Futures Farm

Equine sanctuary. accepts elder equines in need of rehabilitation and/or retirement.

Animals
8
Illinois Valley Food Pantry

Providing food to needy families in the illinois valley area.

Food & Nutrition
9
Plainfield Area Humane Society

To find a safe, loving and appropriate home for every homeless pet, including those with special needs or challenges. PAHS strives to treat, heal, and provide optimal well-being for the animals in their care.

Animals
10
Illinois Horse Rescue of Will County Inc

The organization was founded to provide shelter and care for mistreated or abandoned horses. they provide shelter, food and veterinary services for these animals until a suitable home can be found. as a secondary service, they provide…

Animals
11
Animal Relief Fund Inc

To provide care for animals that are abused and need homes

Animals
12
Morningside Farm Sanctuary

To rescue, rehabilitate, foster and adopt farmed animals and give them the life that they deserve. to provide food, shelter and medical to abandon animals.

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Fisher House Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Moultrie-Douglas County Fair Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 53 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
22/22
Grantees still filing
7/22
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ARTHUR UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $150,000 · OtherARTHUR UNITED METHODIST CHURCHPhokos NFP: $150,000 · OtherPhokos NFPARTHUR HIGH SCHOOL: $59,806 · OtherARTHUR HIGH SCHOOLHOUSE OF HOPE: $30,000 · Other+37 more: $262,300 · Other+37 morePawprint Ministries NFP: $46,000 · AnimalsPawprint …FARM WAY SANCTUARY INC: $11,858 · AnimalsFARM WAY …ILLINOIS RAPTOR CENTER: $5,000 · AnimalsILLINOIS …+1 more: $1,500 · AnimalsSullivan Community Education Foundation: $30,000 · PhilanthropyMEDICAL MISSIONS MINISTRIES INC: $5,000 · PhilanthropyAUSTIN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $2,500 · PhilanthropySHELBYVILLE AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $15,000 · Recreation & SportsMOULTRIE-DOUGLAS COUNTY FAIR ASSOCIATION: $3,000 · Recreation & SportsSKELETON CREW ADVENTURES: $15,000 · Public BenefitFit-2-Serve Inc: $10,000 · ReligionTHE MIGHTY OAKES HEART FOUNDATION: $10,000 · Health
Other$652,106Animals$64,358Philanthropy$37,500Recreation & Sports$18,000Public Benefit$15,000Religion$10,000Health$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPhokos NFP: $150,000 over 3y, 50% of budgetPawprint Ministries NFP: $46,000 over 3y, 8.8% of budgetSullivan Community Education Foundation: $30,000 over 3y, 35% of budgetSKELETON CREW ADVENTURES: $15,000 over 1y, 3.3% of budgetSHELBYVILLE AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $15,000 over 2y, 12% of budgetFARM WAY SANCTUARY INC: $11,858 over 2y, 5.6% of budgetFit-2-Serve Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 12% of budgetTHE MIGHTY OAKES HEART FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetARTHUR LEGACY OF LOVE FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 7.0% of budgetARTHUR CHRISTIAN SCHOOL: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetHOPE OF EAST CENTRAL ILLINOIS NFP: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetMIDWEST FOOD BANK NFP: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHOPE FOR HEARTS FARM INC: $5,000 over 1y, 3.2% of budgetILLINOIS RAPTOR CENTER: $5,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetTHE LITTLE THEATRE - ON THE SQUARE INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetAUSTIN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSTANDING STONE COMMUNITY CENTER NFP: $2,500 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetBRADYS K9 FUND: $1,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetSpikes K9 Fund: $1,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Phokos NFP ↗
  • Who funds Pawprint Ministries NFP ↗
  • Who funds Sullivan Community Education Foundation ↗
  • Who funds SKELETON CREW ADVENTURES ↗
  • Who funds SHELBYVILLE AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FARM WAY SANCTUARY INC ↗
  • Who funds Fit-2-Serve Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE MIGHTY OAKES HEART FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ARTHUR LEGACY OF LOVE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ARTHUR CHRISTIAN SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds HOPE OF EAST CENTRAL ILLINOIS NFP ↗
  • Who funds MIDWEST FOOD BANK NFP ↗
  • Who funds MEDICAL MISSIONS MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds HOPE FOR HEARTS FARM INC ↗
  • Who funds ILLINOIS RAPTOR CENTER ↗
  • Who funds THE LITTLE THEATRE - ON THE SQUARE INC ↗
  • Who funds FISHER HOUSE FOUNDATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Paypal Charitable Giving FundDC5.1× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Network for Good · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Providence Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Providence Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Providence Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Providence Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 53 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Providence’s filings →

    More from the funding graph