Skip to content
The Procaccianti Family Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

The Procaccianti Family Foundation

Its FY2026 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$2k
Granted FY2026still arriving
1
Grants FY2026still arriving
1
States reached
$2k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0162% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$202kRecreation & Sports$46kEducation$27kHousing & Shelter$24kYouth Development$6kPhilanthropy$6kHuman Services$3kArts & Culture$2kOther$0
02FY2026 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$2,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$8k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CLCF - CRANSTON LEAGUE FOR CRANSTONS FUTURE$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–22, $27k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%CROSSROADS RI: $12k → 14%CROSSROADS RI: $12k → 14%YMCA OF GREATER PROVIDENCE: $3k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$772k · 10 repeat orgs$68k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +57% since the first grant, against +24% for those funded once.

10 repeat relationships: 0 still active in FY2026, 10 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2026 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
21

Total granted

$772k
$66k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+57%
+24%

Still filing today

40%
43%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2026, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’26
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’26
EducationHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentRecreation & SportsPhilanthropyHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CROSSROADS RHODE ISLAND
    2× · 2017–2018 · $24k · revenue +99%
  • SPECIAL OLYMPICS RHODE ISLAND INC
    2× · 2020–2022 · $4k · revenue +24%
  • JF
    JAMESTOWN FIRE DEPARTMENT
    5× · 2018–2022 · $2k · revenue +57%

Funded once

  • PROVIDENCE PROMISEgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $20k · revenue +215%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $10k
  • NE
    NEW ENGLAND BASEBALL CLUB INCgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $8k · revenue +34%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Northeast College of Health Sciences

Northeast college of health sciences (the college) is committed to academic excellence, leadership, and professional best practices in the health sciences.

Education
2
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
3
Hampshire Country School

Hampshire country school is a place of possibilities for high-ability, neurodiverse students enrolling in later elementary or middle school who have not found success in traditional educational environments. hampshire country school offers…

—
4
Mitchell College

Mitchell college educates students through a highly individualized educational approach that brings forward each student's potential, reveals their strengths, and fosters personal growth.

Education
5
President and Trustees of Bates College

Bates is a college of the liberal arts and sciences, and is a coeducational, nonsectarian, residential college with special commitments to academic rigor, and to assuring in all of its efforts the dignity of each individual, and access to…

Education
6
Massachusetts Higher Education Assistance Corporation

The organization's primary exempt purpose is to provide access to and conduct activities in furtherance of higher education.

—
7
Westminster College

The mission of westminster college is to help students develop competencies, commitments, and characteristics which have distinguished human beings at their best. see continuation on schedule o.the liberal arts tradition is the foundation…

Education
8
Saint Anselm College

Saint anselm is a catholic, benedictine college providing all of its students a distinctive liberal arts education that incorporates opportunities for professional and career preparation. it does so in a learning community that encourages…

Education
9
Dean College

Dean college is a private, residential new england college grounded in a culture and tradition that all students deserve the opportunity to discover and exceed their greatest aspirations. a personal and transformative community since 1865,…

Education
10
New England Commission of Higher Education Inc

The commission exercises the dual roles of quality assurance and encouraging continuous improvement for degree-granting institutions of higher education nationally and, as determined by the commission, internationally. through a process of…

Education
11
Providence Preparatory Charter School

The mission of pvd prep is to prepare a diverse group of providence middle school students for college preparatory high schools.

Education
12
The Philadelphia School

The philadelphia school educates children for a future that is impossible to know but not impossible to shape. learn here. go anywhere.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Meeting Street; the most unlike its peers is The John a Hartford Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 32 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
11/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $494,121 · OtherIndividual grant recipientHASBRO CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $200,000 · OtherHASBRO CHILDREN'S HOSPITALCRANSTON WESTERN LITTLE LEAGUE: $35,000 · Other+20 more: $39,150 · OtherPROVIDENCE PROMISE: $20,000 · EducationTHE NEW HAMPTON SCHOOL: $5,000 · EducationPresident and Fellows of Middlebury College: $2,000 · EducationCROSSROADS RHODE ISLAND: $24,000 · Human ServicesGREATER PROVIDENCE YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION: $2,500 · Human ServicesNEW ENGLAND BASEBALL CLUB INC: $7,500 · Recreation & SportsTHE JOHN A HARTFORD FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 · PhilanthropyYOUNG VOICES: $5,000 · Youth DevelopmentMeeting Street: $500 · Health
Other$768,271Education$27,000Human Services$26,500Recreation & Sports$7,500Philanthropy$5,000Youth Development$5,000Health$500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCRANSTON WESTERN LITTLE LEAGUE: $35,000 over 2y, 13% of budgetCROSSROADS RHODE ISLAND: $24,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetPROVIDENCE PROMISE: $20,000 over 1y, 8.0% of budgetNEW ENGLAND BASEBALL CLUB INC: $7,500 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetTHE NEW HAMPTON SCHOOL: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE JOHN A HARTFORD FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYOUNG VOICES: $5,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS RHODE ISLAND INC: $3,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetGREATER PROVIDENCE YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJAMESTOWN FIRE DEPARTMENT: $2,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetPresident and Fellows of Middlebury College: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPAN-MASSACHUSETTS CHALLENGE INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMeeting Street: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CRANSTON WESTERN LITTLE LEAGUE ↗
  • Who funds CROSSROADS RHODE ISLAND ↗
  • Who funds PROVIDENCE PROMISE ↗
  • Who funds NEW ENGLAND BASEBALL CLUB INC ↗
  • Who funds THE NEW HAMPTON SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds THE JOHN A HARTFORD FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds YOUNG VOICES ↗
  • Who funds SPECIAL OLYMPICS RHODE ISLAND INC ↗
  • Who funds GREATER PROVIDENCE YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds JAMESTOWN FIRE DEPARTMENT ↗
  • Who funds President and Fellows of Middlebury College ↗
  • Who funds PAN-MASSACHUSETTS CHALLENGE INC ↗
  • Who funds Meeting Street ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Amica Companies Found…Harborone Foundation …The Champlin Foundati…Cvs Health Charity Cl…Centreville Savings B…Ppl FoundationThe Bank of America C…American Online Givin…Fidelity Investments …Donor Advised Charita…Amazonsmile Foundation
Amica Companies FoundationRI17× affinity6 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amica Companies Foundation · Harborone Foundation Rhode Island · The Champlin Foundation · Cvs Health Charity Classic Inc · Centreville Savings Bank Charitable Foundation · Ppl Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Procaccianti Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Procaccianti Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • President and Fellows of Middlebury College: 1% of income from government
  • Pan-Massachusetts Challenge Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 32 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2026, released 2026. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Procaccianti Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home