Skip to content
The Presbyterian Home at Charlotte Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

The Presbyterian Home at Charlotte Inc

We enrich the lives of those we serve by providing a nurturing environment that fosters joy, purpose, and well-being.

$2.6M
Granted FY2024still arriving
10
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$500k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2024.

Health$2.8MHousing & Shelter$515kReligion$150kEducation$140kEmployment$134kHuman Services$120kFood & Nutrition$93kPublic Safety & Disaster$30kOther$0
02FY2024 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 10 grants below total $1,162,936, the rows itemized in this filing. The $2,618,284 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $1,455,348 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k5 grants · $85k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $315k
  • $250k+2 grants · $763k
$100,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$229M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE SHARON FOUNDATION$500,000
UNC CHARLOTTE$262,793
INREACH$110,143
ALZHEIMER'S ASSOCIATION$105,000
QUEEN'S UNIVERSITY$100,000
SHARON PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH$25,000
LEADINGAGE NC FOUNDATION$20,000
AMERICA'S CHARITIES$20,000
SOUTHPARK COMMUNITY PARTNERS$10,000
MEMORY AND MOVEMENT$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–24, $635k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%LEADING AGE FOUNDATION - CHARITABLE VISION FUND: $10k → 8%INREACH: $125k → 10%INREACH: $125k → 10%INREACH: $110k → 10%INREACH: $100k → 10%INREACH: $70k → 10%INREACH: $20k → 10%FRIENDSHIP TRAYS: $25k → 10%NOURISH UP: $25k → 10%FRIENDSHIP TRAYS: $25k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

81%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.2M · 11 repeat orgs$771k to everyone else

11 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
6

Total granted

$3.2M
$251k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+50%
+59%

Still filing today

64%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 55% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $520k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesHealthHousing & ShelterEducationCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • InReach
    6× · 2019–2024 · $550k · revenue +67%
  • Queens University of Charlotte
    3× · 2021–2024 · $140k · revenue +13%
  • AC
    AMERICA'S CHARITIES
    3× · 2020–2024 · $134k · revenue +14%

Funded once

  • UC
    UNC CHARLOTTE
    one grant, 2018 · $183k
  • FT
    Friendship Trays Inc
    one grant, 2020 · $18k · revenue -77%
  • LN
    LAURELWOOD NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION
    one grant, 2021 · $15k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Carolina Meadows Foundation Inc

To solicit and receive gifts, grants, bequests and contributions for the support of carolina meadows, inc. in order to enhance or extend its mission, programs, services, and facilities.

Human Services
2
The Presbyterian Home At Charlotte Inc

We enrich the lives of those we serve by providing a nurturing environment that fosters joy, purpose, and well-being.

Human Services
3
For Charlotte Inc

To unite the Church to transform the city through the power of the Gospel.

Religion
4
MemoryCare Inc

MemoryCares mission is three-fold: to provide specialized medical care to older adults with cognitive impairment; to support caregivers with education, counseling, and improved access to services; and to provide community education.

Health
5
Carolina Community Care Inc

The mission of hospice & community care is to give hope, comfort, and compassion to those that need it most. hospice & community care is a nonprofit healthcare organization providing hospice and palliative care to residents of york,…

—
6
Ucc Living Centers Incorporated

To provide affordable housing to senior citizens in chapel hill, nc.

Housing & Shelter
7
Coastal Carolinas Health Alliance

Facilitate networking among hospitals

Health
8
Ncr At Home Health and Wellness

Originating from a christian commitment of service, we provide high quality care, services and communities for seniors

—
9
National Church Residences At Home Health and Wellness Central Ohio

Originating from a christian commitment of service, we provide high quality care, services and communities for seniors

—
10
National Church Residences At Home Hospice Central Ohio

Originating from a christian commitment of service, we provide high quality care, services and communities for seniors

—
11
National Church Residences At Home Hospice

Originating from a christian commitment of service, we provide high quality care, services and communities for seniors

—
12
National Church Residences At Home Central Ohio

Originating from a christian commitment of service, we provide high quality care, services and communities for seniors.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Leadingage North Carolina; the most unlike its peers is Charlotte Neuroscience Foundation Dba Memory and Movement Charlotte. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/13
Grantees still filing
9/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHARLOTTE: $1,141,156 · OtherTHE UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHARLOTTEALZHEIMER'S ASSOCIATION: $821,130 · OtherALZHEIMER'S ASSOCIATIONUNC CHARLOTTE: $183,438 · OtherUNC CHARLOTTESHARON PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $150,000 · OtherSHARON PRESBYTERIAN CHURCHAMERICA'S CHARITIES: $134,000 · Other+5 more: $163,000 · Other+5 moreInReach: $550,143 · Human ServicesInReachNourish Up: $75,000 · Human ServicesNourish Up+1 more: $10,000 · Human ServicesTHE SHARON FOUNDATION: $500,000 · Housing & ShelterTHE SHARON FOU…+1 more: $10,000 · Housing & ShelterQueens University of Charlotte: $140,000 · EducationCharlotte Neuroscience Foundation DBA Memory and Movement Charlotte: $95,000 · HealthCHARLOTTE COMMUNITY HEALTH CLINIC INC: $14,151 · HealthSouthPark Community Partners Inc: $20,000 · Community Improvement
Other$2,592,724Human Services$635,143Housing & Shelter$510,000Education$140,000Health$109,151Community Improvement$20,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetInReach: $550,143 over 6y, 0.6% of budgetTHE SHARON FOUNDATION: $500,000 over 1y, 72% of budgetQueens University of Charlotte: $140,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICA'S CHARITIES: $134,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCharlotte Neuroscience Foundation DBA Memory and Movement Charlotte: $95,000 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetNourish Up: $75,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetThe Shepherds Center of Charlotte: $35,000 over 3y, 8.0% of budgetSouthPark Community Partners Inc: $20,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetTHE NORTH CAROLINA HOMES FOR THE AGING FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetFriendship Trays Inc: $18,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetCHARLOTTE COMMUNITY HEALTH CLINIC INC: $14,151 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetLEADINGAGE NORTH CAROLINA: $10,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetLEADINGAGE INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds InReach ↗
  • Who funds THE SHARON FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Queens University of Charlotte ↗
  • Who funds AMERICA'S CHARITIES ↗
  • Who funds Charlotte Neuroscience Foundation DBA Memory and Movement Charlotte ↗
  • Who funds Nourish Up ↗
  • Who funds The Shepherds Center of Charlotte ↗
  • Who funds SouthPark Community Partners Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE NORTH CAROLINA HOMES FOR THE AGING FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Friendship Trays Inc ↗
  • Who funds CHARLOTTE COMMUNITY HEALTH CLINIC INC ↗
  • Who funds LEADINGAGE NORTH CAROLINA ↗
  • Who funds LEADINGAGE INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Southminster IncFoundation for the Ca…George W & Ruth R Bax…Natl Christian Charit…The Bank of America C…Fidelity Investments …Donor Advised Charita…Amazonsmile Foundation
Southminster IncNC17.9× affinity6 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Southminster Inc · Foundation for the Carolinas · George W & Ruth R Baxter Foundation Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Presbyterian Home at Charlotte Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Presbyterian Home at Charlotte Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%5%19%42%75%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Presbyterian Home at Charlotte Inc?

    Find your warmest path to The Presbyterian Home at Charlotte Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Presbyterian Home at Charlotte’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home