Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Preik Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$735k
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$300k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

International$2.0MReligion$1.1MHuman Services$333k
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k3 grants · $65k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $370k
  • $250k+1 grant · $300k
$65,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$10.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Jews for Jesus$300,000
Christian Health Service Corps$175,000
Heal Africa USA$130,000
Sigi & David Oblander Ministries Inc$65,000
Amelia Planation Chapel Inc$25,000
Jerry & Jana Lackey Ministries Inc$20,000
Hope Walks$20,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $1.2M) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Heal Africa USA: $559k → 11%Heal Africa USA: $285k → 11%Heal Africa USA: $210k → 11%Heal Africa USA: $130k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MI
NY
PA
CA
TN
NC
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 9% of The Preik Family Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

The Preik Family Foundation Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

80%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.7M · 6 repeat orgs$681k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +12% since the first grant, against +1% for those funded once.

6 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
4

Total granted

$2.7M
$361k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+12%
+1%

Still filing today

83%
75%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 56% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $320k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
InternationalReligionHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SD
    SIGI & DAVID OBLANDER MINISTRIES INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $510k · revenue +100% · 65% of their budget
  • JJ
    Jerry & Jana Lackey Ministries Inc
    6× · 2020–2025 · $225k · revenue +12%
  • SP
    SAMARITAN'S PURSE
    6× · 2020–2025 · $60k · revenue +106%

Funded once

  • ISAIAH 117 HOUSEgraduated
    3× · 2023–2025 · $333k · revenue +27%
  • PC
    POWER CROSS
    2× · 2024–2025 · $13k · revenue 0%
  • MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC
    3× · 2023–2025 · $10k · revenue +1%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
New Heart World Ministries
Religion
2
House of Prayer for All Nations

Church ministry

Religion
3
Christian Ministries International
—
4
Sole Ministries

None

Religion
5
Message to All Nations Man

To reach out with the message of the gospel of jesus to the last, least, and the lost

Human Services
6
Samaritan Servants International

Samaritan servants international endeavors to rescue people as jesus mandated in luke 10 by ministering to people in destitute countries that have both physical and other needs for survival by offering food,water, shelter and hope through…

International
7
Everything Laid Down Ministries

To give the gospel of Jesus Christ of Nazareth to the poor and dejected of the world. We do this by caring for widows, orphans, and broken people around the world. We care for hem by feeding, clothing, and encouraging them in Jesus by His…

Religion
8
International Health & Development Network Inc

To develope a ministry using the earthly work of Jesus Christ as a model and thereby seek the physical, mental, emotional and spiritual well-being of individuals in communities, esecially in developing countries by providing humanitarian…

Philanthropy
9
Asia Us Impact

Religious

Religion
10
Kids for Him

assisting orphans and missionary in need

International
11
Jesus in Vietnam Ministries
Religion
12
Gods Promise Ministries International

Religious Purposes

Housing & Shelter
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Heal Africa Usa; the most unlike its peers is Jerry & Jana Lackey Ministries Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
7/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

HEAL AFRICA USA: $1,184,000 · Human ServicesHEAL AFRICA USAISAIAH 117 HOUSE: $333,000 · Human ServicesISAIAH 117 HOUSEChristian Health Service Corps Inc: $680,000 · InternationalChristian Health Service Corps…Jerry & Jana Lackey Ministries Inc: $225,000 · InternationalJerry & Jana Lackey Ministries…+2 more: $30,000 · InternationalSIGI & DAVID OBLANDER MINISTRIES INC: $510,000 · ReligionSIGI & DAVID OBLAND…SAMARITAN'S PURSE: $60,000 · ReligionSAMARITAN'S PURSE+1 more: $12,500 · ReligionJEWS FOR JESUS: $300,000 · OtherJEWS FOR JESU…AMELIA PLANTATION CHAPEL INC: $89,000 · OtherAMELIA PLANTA…+1 more: $5,000 · Other
Human Services$1,517,000International$935,000Religion$582,500Other$394,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHEAL AFRICA USA: $1,184,000 over 6y, 69% of budgetChristian Health Service Corps Inc: $680,000 over 3y, 9.2% of budgetSIGI & DAVID OBLANDER MINISTRIES INC: $510,000 over 6y, 65% of budgetISAIAH 117 HOUSE: $333,000 over 3y, 2.1% of budgetJerry & Jana Lackey Ministries Inc: $225,000 over 6y, 7.4% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $60,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetHOPE WALKS INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetPOWER CROSS: $12,500 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $10,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds HEAL AFRICA USA ↗
  • Who funds Christian Health Service Corps Inc ↗
  • Who funds SIGI & DAVID OBLANDER MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds ISAIAH 117 HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds Jerry & Jana Lackey Ministries Inc ↗
  • Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE ↗
  • Who funds HOPE WALKS INC ↗
  • Who funds POWER CROSS ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Natl Christian Charitable Fdn IncGA9.7× affinity6 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Preik Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Preik Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%5%19%42%75%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Preik Family Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to The Preik Family Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Preik Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph