How much did The Pranan Foundation Inc grant in FY2024?

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 59% of The Pranan Foundation Inc’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2018

—

2019

further foundation'schildren's

2020

furtherglobal

2021

atlantafurtheryouthcancer researchimpact

2022

golfatlantayouthfurthercancer researchimpact

2023

foster careatlantasenioryouthcancer research

2024

internationalatlantayouthcancer research

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2024 · 37 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

Under $10k21 grants · $114k
$10k–50k16 grants · $160k

$7,500

Median grant

States reached

$5.2M

Total assets

Largest grants

INTOWN COLLABORATIVE MINISTRIES$10,000
THE 410 BRIDGE$10,000
ATLANTA COMMUNITY FOOD BANK$10,000
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY$10,000
ST JUDE$10,000
ATLANTA MISSION$10,000
WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT$10,000
SENIOR CITIZEN PROGRAM$10,000
ATLANTA MUSIC PROJECT$10,000
TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION$10,000
CAMP HORIZON INC$10,000
SEWA INTERNATIONAL INC$10,000
RAKSHA$10,000
OPEN HAND$10,000
BONNIE YOUTH CLUB$10,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY21–24, $106k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12% — the area typically sits at 9%. 84% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 16% of The Pranan Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 68% of the giving stays in GA; read by stated purpose it is 59% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

The Pranan Foundation Inclessmore of its giving

Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

75%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$680k · 37 repeat orgs$227k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +78% since the first grant, against +49% for the ones you funded once.

37 repeat relationships — 24 still active in FY2024, 13 since wound down; 13 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$680k

$146k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+78%

+49%

Still filing today

43%

50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 71% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $81k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Human ServicesEducationArts & CulturePhilanthropyRecreation & SportsHealthOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

RI
RAKSHA INC
6× · 2018–2024 · $48k · revenue +39%
AM
ATLANTA MUSIC PROJECT
4× · 2021–2024 · $33k · revenue +645%
BREAST CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION
5× · 2018–2024 · $30k · revenue +49%

Funded once

TG
THE GRADY FOUNDATION
one grant, 2020 · $38k
MF
MIG FOUNDATION
one grant, 2021 · $11k · revenue -20%
DF
DRESS FOR SUCCESS ATLANTAgraduated
one grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue +108%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Atlanta Woman's Club

To encourage our members to become interested, involved citizens of the community by engaging in the charitable activities that benefit the community as a whole.

Community Improvement

The Atlanta Girls' School Inc

Inspiring girls to lead lives of purpose.

—

Atlanta Association of Legal

—

Atlanta Track Club Inc

Committed to creating an active atlanta through running and walking, atlanta track club motivates, inspires, and engages our community to enjoy a healthier lifestyle.

Recreation & Sports

Atlanta Ballet Inc

Atlanta Ballet shares the power & joy of dance through a balanced, rich & diverse repertoire. It broadens dance appreciation, instruction, and education throughout the community.

Arts & Culture

Atlanta Committee for Progress Inc

ACP is a group committed to identifying and providing leadership on selected issues important to driving the economic development of the city of Atlanta and for which the ACP's active involvement will make a major difference. The ACP has a…

—

Arts Critic Atl Inc

Arts atl is a non-profit organization that promotes a healthy and vibrant arts community in metro atlanta.

—

Georgia Alliance for Breast Cancer

Support Georgians by raising money for breast health and breast cancer programs.

Health

Life House Atlanta Inc

Human Services

Girls Inc of Greater Atlanta Inc

Our mission at Girls Incorporated of Greater Atlanta (GIGA) is to inspire all girls to be strong, smart, and bold. Our programs are evidence-based, aligned with the national Girls Incorporated evaluations, and tailored to meet the unique…

Youth Development

Georgia Center for Child Advocacy Inc

The Georgia center for child advocacy's mission is to champion the needs of sexually and severely physically abused children through prevention, intervention, therapy, and collaboration.

Human Services

Medlink Georgia Inc

Medlink georgia is a federally qualified community health center in north east georgia that serves over 69,000 patients. medlink georgia not only treats illness, but also provides preventive services to keep patients well. medlink is a…

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Atlanta Children's Shelter Incorporated and the most unlike its peers is Nova Ukraine. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side

Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 29 years old; the field is 11. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 28% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 16% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

0.0%0/39

the rest of the field

16%

9,180/58,262

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

06the grantee network

36 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

35/36

Grantees still filing

31/36

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$587,600Human Services$151,650Arts & Culture$52,000Recreation & Sports$35,500Public Safety & Disaster$30,000Philanthropy$29,500Food & Nutrition$20,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Community Foundation for GreaterGA29.6× affinity14 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Community Foundation for Greater · The Imlay Foundation Inc · Georgia Power Foundation Inc · Community Foundation for Northeast · The Waterfall Foundation Inc · Ryan Ida Alice Tuw Main · Atl Fdn-W Peters Main · Tr Uw Charles I Branan · The Arthur M Blank Family Foundation · United Way of Greater Atlanta Inc · Mightycause Charitable Foundation · John H & Wilhelmina D Harland

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation The Pranan Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

1get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: MAXIMUS JANTON FOUNDATION.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

insufficient risk

Limited financial data in public filings.

Track record & reputation

medium risk

4 years of Form 990 filings, still active.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 831559276 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on MAXIMUS JANTON FOUNDATION, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

Awaiting reportFinancial stability— Runway not derivable from filings.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 9% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to The Pranan Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to The Pranan Foundation Inc through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

The Pranan Foundation Inc

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Where the work is directed

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

36 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to The Pranan Foundation Inc?

More from the funding graph

The Pranan Foundation Inc

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Where the work is directed

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

36 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to The Pranan Foundation Inc?

More from the funding graph