Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Pranan Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$274k
Granted FY2024still arriving
37
Grants FY2024still arriving
8
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What you fund
0192% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20182024.

Human Services$186kHealth$139kEducation$86kHousing & Shelter$77kYouth Development$66kFood & Nutrition$55kInternational$47kArts & Culture$47kOther$0
02FY2024 · 37 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k21 grants · $114k
  • $10k–50k16 grants · $160k
$7,500
Median grant
8
States reached
$4.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ATLANTA MISSION$10,000
WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT$10,000
USGA FOUNDATION$10,000
ATLANTA COMMUNITY FOOD BANK$10,000
TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION$10,000
RAKSHA$10,000
OPEN HAND$10,000
SEWA INTERNATIONAL INC$10,000
ST JUDE$10,000
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY$10,000
CAMP HORIZON INC$10,000
BONNIE YOUTH CLUB$10,000
ATLANTA MUSIC PROJECT$10,000
SENIOR CITIZEN PROGRAM$10,000
THE 410 BRIDGE$10,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY21–24, $121k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 74% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%THE LUSTGARTEN FOUNDATION: $10k → 6%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $10k → 14%MAXIMUS JANTON FOUNDATION: $6k → 9%THE LUSTGARTEN FOUNDATION: $5k → 6%MAXIMUS JANTON FOUNDATION: $5k → 9%MAXIMUS JANTON FOUNDATION: $650 → 9%EXCEPTIONAL FOUNDATION OF ATLANTA: $5k → 14%HELPING MAMAS: $5k → 9%DRESS FOR SUCCESS ATLANTA: $10k → 13%KATE'S CLUB: $8k → 14%THE 410 BRIDGE: $10k → 13%THE 410 BRIDGE: $10k → 13%INTOWN COLLABORATIVE MINISTRIES: $10k → 13%INTOWN COLLABORATIVE MINISTRIES: $10k → 13%THE 410 BRIDGE: $5k → 13%INTOWN COLLABORATIVE MINISTRIES: $9k → 13%RAKSHA: $3k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

MN
WI
NY
OH
NJ
CA
UT
AZ
TN
LA
GA
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 16% of The Pranan Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 68% of the giving stays in GA; read by stated purpose it is 59% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

The Pranan Foundation Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

76%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$682k · 35 repeat orgs$217k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +30% since the first grant, against +11% for the ones you funded once.

35 repeat relationships — 25 still active in FY2024, 10 since wound down; 12 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

35
23

Total granted

$682k
$144k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+30%
+11%

Still filing today

66%
70%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 73% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $73k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesEducationArts & CultureInternationalRecreation & SportsPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RI
    RAKSHA INC
    6× · 2018–2024 · $48k · revenue +39%
  • THE BREAST CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC
    5× · 2018–2024 · $30k · revenue +30%
  • IC
    INTOWN COLLABORATIVE MINISTRIES INC
    3× · 2022–2024 · $29k · revenue +108%

Funded once

  • TG
    THE GRADY FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2020 · $38k
  • MF
    MIG FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2021 · $11k · revenue -20%
  • DF
    DRESS FOR SUCCESS ATLANTA INCgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue +35%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Georgia Center for Nonprofits

Our mission is to create thriving communities by helping nonprofits succeed. our work revolves around four primary areas of focus.1. we are a hub for social innovation 2. we are a capacity accelerator for organizations and their people3.…

Community Improvement
2
Metro Atlanta Chamber of Commerce Inc

The corporation is a voluntary association of individuals and organizations the purposes of which are to upgrade and advance the atlanta metropolitan area in population, commerce and finance; to effect civic and social improvements; to…

3
Morehouse School of Medicine

Leading the creation and advancement of health equity we exist to improve the health and well-being of individuals and communities, increase the diversity of the health professional and scientific workforce, and address primary health care…

Education
4
Children's Healthcare of Atlanta Inc

To make kids better today and healthier tomorrow.

Health
5
Atlanta Committee for Progress Inc

ACP is a group committed to identifying and providing leadership on selected issues important to driving the economic development of the city of Atlanta and for which the ACP's active involvement will make a major difference. The ACP has a…

6
Acfb Charitable Investments Inc

Acfb charitable investments, inc., is operated exclusively for the benefit of, to perform the functions of, or to carry out the purposes and/or activities of atlanta community food bank, inc., a georgia nonprofit corporation.

Food & Nutrition
7
Activate Global Inc

Activate empowers scientists to reinvent the world by bringing their research to market. activate partners with u.s. based funders, research institutions, and other pillars of the hard technology community to help entrepreneurial…

Environment
8
Georgia Alliance for Breast Cancer F/K/a It's the Journey

Georgia alliance for breast cancer mission is to engage with georgia's breast cancer community to increase access to care and reduce disparities in cancer outcomes.

Health
9
The Grady Health Foundation Inc

The mission of the grady health foundation is to grow both philanthropic support and broad-based understanding of the critical role that grady health system plays in the metro atlanta region. our focus is to ensure grady health system has…

Philanthropy
10
Georgia Advanced Technology Ventures Inc

The corporation is organized and shall be operated exclusively as a supporting organization to and for the benefit of the georgia institute of technology to foster and support education and scientific research and economic development…

Education
11
The Community Foundation for Greater Atlanta Inc

Atlanta is #1 for income inequality in the nation. as such, the needs in our community are pressing and we need to move with the urgency of now to address those needs. the community foundation has unequivocally embraced equity as our #1…

Philanthropy
12
Accion International

Our mission is to create a fair and inclusive economy where underserved people have quality financial choices and opportunities to improve their economic well-being. we find and help build innovative companies with the potential to reach…

International

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Atlanta Union Mission Corporation and the most unlike its peers is Childspring International Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyCommunity FoundationsChristian Missionary Organi…Christian Youth CampsFood Banks and PantriesYouth Sports ProgramsHealth Access Advocacy and …Community College Foundatio…Independent K-12 SchoolsCancer Support ServicesPolicy Research and AdvocacyDomestic Violence Services
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 27 years old; the field is 11. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number28%0%<5yr17%11%5–10yr20%21%10–20yr14%34%20–35yr9%27%35–55yr13%7%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value28%0%<5yr17%9%5–10yr20%25%10–20yr14%34%20–35yr9%30%35–55yr13%3%55yr+

The field is 28% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 19% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/50
the rest of the field
19%
10,947/58,251

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

47 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 47 of the 71 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
47/47
Grantees still filing
30/47
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

THE GRADY FOUNDATION — $38,470 · OtherTHE GRADY FOUNDATIONSENIOR CITIZENS PROGRAM INC — $36,003 · OtherSENIOR CITIZENS PROGRAM INCBONNIE YOUTH CLUB — $33,000 · OtherBONNIE YOUTH CLUBIACA SCHOLARSHIP FUND — $30,000 · OtherIACA SCHOLARSHIP FUNDNAMC — $30,000 · OtherNAMCHABITAT FOR HUMANITY — $25,000 · OtherST JUDE — $22,500 · OtherCamp Horizon Inc — $20,000 · OtherTHE BREAST CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC — $30,000 · OtherTHE BREAST CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION INCMEDSHARE INTERNATIONAL INC — $22,500 · OtherATLANTA RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES INC — $26,500 · OtherATLANTA RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES INC+31 more — $174,127 · Other+31 moreRAKSHA INC — $48,000 · Human ServicesRAKSHA INCINTOWN COLLABORATIVE MINISTRIES INC — $29,000 · Human ServicesINTOWN COLLABORATIVE MI…THE 410 BRIDGE INC — $25,000 · Human ServicesTHE 410 BRIDGE INCATLANTA UNION MISSION CORPORATION — $20,000 · Human ServicesATLANTA UNION MISSION C…MARC LUSTGARTEN PANCREATIC CANCER FOUNDATION — $15,000 · Human ServicesMARC LUSTGARTEN PANCREA…MAXIMUS JANTON FOUNDATION INC — $11,650 · Human ServicesMAXIMUS JANTON FOUNDATI…DRESS FOR SUCCESS ATLANTA INC — $10,000 · Human ServicesDRESS FOR SUCCESS ATLAN…WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC — $10,000 · Human ServicesWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT…KATE'S CLUB INC — $8,000 · Human Services+2 more — $10,000 · Human Services+2 moreOPEN HAND ATLANTA INC — $33,000 · Food & NutritionATLANTA COMMUNITY FOOD BANK INC — $20,000 · Food & NutritionTHE OVARIAN CANCER RESEARCH FUND INC — $20,000 · PhilanthropyNMDP FOUNDATION — $15,000 · PhilanthropyRYAN SEACREST FOUNDATION INC — $7,500 · PhilanthropyFAIRFIELD COUNTY FOUNDATION — $7,000 · PhilanthropyATLANTA MUSIC PROJECT INC — $33,000 · Arts & CultureOUR RESCUE — $10,000 · Arts & CultureTHE CHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF ATLANTA INC — $4,000 · Arts & CultureSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION — $27,000 · EducationATLANTA INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL — $7,500 · EducationTHE UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA FOUNDATION — $5,000 · EducationRON CLARK ACADEMY INC — $4,000 · EducationLIFE UNIVERSITY INC — $2,000 · Education+1 more — $1,000 · EducationUSGA FOUNDATION — $18,500 · Recreation & SportsTHE GEORGIA CUP INC — $12,000 · Recreation & SportsJEUNESS TRACK CLUB INC — $5,000 · Recreation & Sports
Other$488,100Human Services$186,650Food & Nutrition$53,000Philanthropy$49,500Arts & Culture$47,000Education$46,500Recreation & Sports$35,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetRAKSHA INC — $48,000 over 6y, 0.8% of budgetATLANTA MUSIC PROJECT INC — $33,000 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetOPEN HAND ATLANTA INC — $33,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetTHE BREAST CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC — $30,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetINTOWN COLLABORATIVE MINISTRIES INC — $29,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION — $27,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetATLANTA RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES INC — $26,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetTHE 410 BRIDGE INC — $25,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetMEDSHARE INTERNATIONAL INC — $22,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetATLANTA COMMUNITY FOOD BANK INC — $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE OVARIAN CANCER RESEARCH FUND INC — $20,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetATLANTA UNION MISSION CORPORATION — $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCamp Horizon Inc — $20,000 over 2y, 4.1% of budgetUSGA FOUNDATION — $18,500 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetNMDP FOUNDATION — $15,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMARC LUSTGARTEN PANCREATIC CANCER FOUNDATION — $15,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetATLANTA CHILDREN'S SHELTER INCORPORATED — $13,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetTHE GEORGIA CUP INC — $12,000 over 2y, 1.9% of budgetMAXIMUS JANTON FOUNDATION INC — $11,650 over 3y, 9.1% of budgetDRESS FOR SUCCESS ATLANTA INC — $10,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetOUR RESCUE — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTransformations By Atlanta Angels — $8,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetKATE'S CLUB INC — $8,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetRYAN SEACREST FOUNDATION INC — $7,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetATLANTA INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL — $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBoys & Girls Clubs of Metro Atlanta Inc — $7,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFAIRFIELD COUNTY FOUNDATION — $7,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetFIFTH AVENUE COMMITTEE INC — $6,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWEST SIDE FEDERATION FOR SENIOR AND SUPPORTIVE HOUSING INC — $6,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOOL GIRLS INC — $5,625 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetTHE UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA FOUNDATION — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJEUNESS TRACK CLUB INC — $5,000 over 1y, 3.9% of budgetEXCEPTIONAL FUTURES CORPORATION — $5,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetCHILDSPRING INTERNATIONAL INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetHELPING MAMAS INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNOVA UKRAINE — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE PROMISE OF JUSTICE INITIATIVE — $4,500 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetRON CLARK ACADEMY INC — $4,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE CHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF ATLANTA INC — $4,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMK LEVEL PLAYING FIELD INSTITUTE — $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNeve Michael Childrens Village Inc — $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetLIFE UNIVERSITY INC — $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGeorgia Transplant Foundation Inc — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMOREHOUSE COLLEGE — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCollege Golf Fellowship — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Community Foundation for Greater Atlanta IncGA27.7× affinity13 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Community Foundation for Greater Atlanta Inc · The Imlay Foundation Inc · Georgia Power Foundation Inc · The Waterfall Foundation Inc · Community Foundation for Northeast Georgia · Jewish Federation of Greater Atlanta Inc · Luluma Charitable Trust Xxxxx8009 · Atl Fdn-W Peters Main · THDF II Inc DBA The Home Depot Foundation & Homer Fund · The Arthur M Blank Family Foundation · Mightycause Charitable Foundation · Tuw Thomas H Pitts

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Pranan Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 20%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 0%
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
10report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 71 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph