Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Pomeroy Family Foundation

Its FY2023 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$2.3M
Granted FY2023
27
Grants FY2023
12
States reached
$2.2M
Largest
01What it funds
0192% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2023.

Philanthropy$2.3MEducation$261kInternational$65kEnvironment$46kScience & Tech$44kArts & Culture$38kRecreation & Sports$31kHealth$27kOther$0
02FY2023 · 27 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2023

  • Under $10k24 grants · $97k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $21k
  • $250k+1 grant · $2.2M
$4,000
Median grant
12
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FIDELITY CHARITABLE POMEROY DONOR$2,215,745
CRISTA$11,000
PURDUE UNIVESITY FOUNDATION$10,000
PENN STATE UNIVERSITY$8,000
WORLD BICYCLE RELIEF$6,000
UNION MISSION MINISTRIES$5,500
FRIENDS OF THE BWCA WILDERNESS$5,500
ENGLISH LANGUAGE INSTITUTE$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
ALBION COLLEGE$5,000
CHURCH HILL ACADEMY$5,000
PENINSULA RESCUE MISSION$5,000
HAITI PARTNERS$4,500
Individual grant recipient$4,000
AIAA FOUNDATION$4,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–23, $25k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%CHALLENGED ATHLETES FOUNDATION: $5k → 11%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $2k → 14%CHALLENGED ATHLETES FOUNDATION: $4k → 11%CHALLENGED ATHLETES FOUNDATION: $4k → 11%CHALLENGED ATHLETES FOUNDATION: $4k → 11%CHALLENGED ATHLETES FOUNDATION: $3k → 11%CHALLENGED ATHLETES FOUNDATION: $3k → 11%CHALLENGED ATHLETES FOUNDATION: $3k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
WA
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
IN
PA
CA
CO
MO
VA
NC
DC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

23%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$663k · 38 repeat orgs$2.3M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +54% since the first grant, against +46% for those funded once.

38 repeat relationships: 23 still active in FY2023, 15 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

38
10

Total granted

$663k
$28k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+54%
+46%

Still filing today

50%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 4% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2.2M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
EducationHuman ServicesArts & CultureInternationalEnvironmentHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WORLD BICYCLE RELIEF NFP
    7× · 2017–2023 · $42k · revenue +81%
  • University of Illinois Foundation
    5× · 2017–2021 · $25k · revenue +127%
  • CA
    CHALLENGED ATHLETES INC
    7× · 2017–2023 · $23k · revenue +54%

Funded once

  • PS
    PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2017 · $9k
  • CS
    CV SCHOOL DISTRICT
    one grant, 2017 · $8k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
2
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
3
Augustana College

Rooted in the liberal arts & sciences & lutheran expression of the christian faith, & is committed to offering a challenging education that develops qualities of mind, spirit, & body necessary for a rewarding life of leadership & service…

Education
4
Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University Inc

Embry-riddle is the world leader in aviation and aerospace higher education. its mission is to teach the science, practice and business of aviation and aerospace, preparing students for productive careers and leadership roles in business,…

Education
5
American Association for the Advancement of Science

Advance science, engineering, and innovation throughout the world for the benefit of all. the world's largest multidisciplinary scientific society and a leading publisher of cutting-edge research through its science family of journals,…

Science & Tech
6
World Wildlife Fund Inc

Wwf's mission is to conserve nature and reduce the most pressing threats to the diversity of life on earth. (continued on schedule o)

Environment
7
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
8
Augsburg University

Augsburg university educates students to be informed citizens, thoughtful stewards, critical thinkers, and responsible leaders.the augsburg experience is supported by an engaged community that is committed to intentional diversity in its…

Education
9
Earth & Space Research

Increase societal understanding of the earth system through scientific research and education.

Science & Tech
10
Conservation International Foundation

Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.

Environment
11
State University of Iowa Alumni Association

Our mission is to strengthen the university of iowa through alumni engagement. we do this through our communications, alumni programs, and events.

—
12
University of Illinois Alumni Association

The mission of the university of illinois alumni association is to enhance and advance the relationship between the university of illinois at urbana-champaign (the university) and all its alumni; to inspire lifelong loyalty and pride among…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is University of Minnesota Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Bountifield International. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

24 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 24 of the 52 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
24/24
Grantees still filing
17/24
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

FIDELITY CHARITABLE POMEROY DONOR: $2,215,745 · OtherFIDELITY CHARITABLE POMEROY DONOR+33 more: $444,420 · Other+33 moreALBION COLLEGE: $30,000 · EducationUniversity of Illinois Foundation: $25,000 · EducationAIAA FOUNDATION: $18,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION: $13,000 · EducationEAGLE FOUNDATION: $11,300 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA FOUNDATION: $10,000 · EducationNORTHLAND COLLEGE: $5,700 · EducationBOUNTIFIELD INTERNATIONAL: $24,000 · InternationalHaiti Partners Inc: $23,000 · InternationalCHALLENGED ATHLETES INC: $23,000 · Human ServicesEVERETT GOSPEL MISSION: $18,250 · Human ServicesAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $1,500 · Human ServicesWORLD BICYCLE RELIEF NFP: $42,000 · Public Safety & DisasterBAYFIELD HERITAGE ASSOCIATION INC: $17,800 · Arts & CultureListening Point Foundation: $4,200 · Arts & CultureMUSEUM OF FLIGHT FOUNDATION: $1,500 · Arts & CultureFRIENDS OF HOG ISLAND AKA FOHI: $12,500 · EnvironmentNATIONAL AUDUBON SOCIETY INC: $4,900 · Environment
Other$2,660,165Education$113,000International$47,000Human Services$42,750Public Safety & Disaster$42,000Arts & Culture$23,500Environment$17,400

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWORLD BICYCLE RELIEF NFP: $42,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetALBION COLLEGE: $30,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Illinois Foundation: $25,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetBOUNTIFIELD INTERNATIONAL: $24,000 over 7y, 0.6% of budgetHaiti Partners Inc: $23,000 over 7y, 0.6% of budgetCHALLENGED ATHLETES INC: $23,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetEVERETT GOSPEL MISSION: $18,250 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetAIAA FOUNDATION: $18,000 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetBAYFIELD HERITAGE ASSOCIATION INC: $17,800 over 6y, 3.1% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION: $13,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF HOG ISLAND AKA FOHI: $12,500 over 4y, 2.5% of budgetPENINSULA RESCUE MISSION INC: $12,500 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetEAGLE FOUNDATION: $11,300 over 7y, 0.6% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS WISCONSIN INC: $8,175 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCARE NET RESOURCE PREGNANCY CENTERS INC: $7,500 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetNORTHLAND COLLEGE: $5,700 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL AUDUBON SOCIETY INC: $4,900 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetListening Point Foundation: $4,200 over 4y, 2.1% of budgetFRIENDS OF SOUTH GEORGIA ISLAND: $3,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMUSEUM OF FLIGHT FOUNDATION: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SHRINERS' HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds WORLD BICYCLE RELIEF NFP ↗
  • Who funds ALBION COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds University of Illinois Foundation ↗
  • Who funds BOUNTIFIELD INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds Haiti Partners Inc ↗
  • Who funds CHALLENGED ATHLETES INC ↗
  • Who funds EVERETT GOSPEL MISSION ↗
  • Who funds AIAA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BAYFIELD HERITAGE ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF HOG ISLAND AKA FOHI ↗
  • Who funds PENINSULA RESCUE MISSION INC ↗
  • Who funds EAGLE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SPECIAL OLYMPICS WISCONSIN INC ↗
  • Who funds CARE NET RESOURCE PREGNANCY CENTERS INC ↗
  • Who funds NORTHLAND COLLEGE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Pfizer Foundation IncNY11.4× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Pomeroy Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Pomeroy Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →median 6%
  • The Shriners' Hospital for Children: 6% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 52 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Pomeroy Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph