· Private foundation
The Pmg Foundation Inc Agy - Uma 1035017881
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k3 grants · $15k
- $50k–250k5 grants · $435k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Friends of Riverside Park | $160,000 |
| La Crosse Community Foundation | $100,000 |
| MAYO CLINIC | $75,000 |
| BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF SPARTA | $50,000 |
| BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA GATEWAY AREA | $50,000 |
| Family & Children's Center | $5,000 |
| Horse Sense for Special Riders | $5,000 |
| LA CROSSE FILM ACADEMY | $5,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY25–25, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +39% since the first grant, against +7% for the ones you funded once.
15 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2025, 11 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $15k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- FOFRIENDS OF RIVERSIDE PARK INC3× · 2023–2025 · $670k · revenue +97% · 48% of their budget
MISSISSIPPI VALLEY CONSERVANCY INC5× · 2020–2024 · $285k · revenue +145%- LCLa Crosse Area Family Young Men's Christian Association Inc4× · 2021–2024 · $200k · revenue +16%
Funded once
- GLGundersen Lutheran Medical Center Incgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $50k · revenue +25%
- FOFRIENDS OF SPARTA PUBLIC LIBRARY INone grant, 2020 · $50k · revenue +2%
- GLGundersen Lutheran Medical Foundation Incone grant, 2021 · $50k · revenue -28%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To honor and celebrate our rich theatrical heritage while establishing a sustainable foundation for the years to come.
Landmark conservancy is a nationally accredited, nonprofit conservation organization serving 20 counties across northwest wisconsin. their mission is to conserve wisconsin's natural legacy for everyone...forever.
To protect, conserve, and enhance wisconsin's natural resources by advocating for and supporting county conservation efforts, for current and future generations.
To share christ's love as we serve the spiritual, physical, intellectual and emotional needs of people entrusted to our care and others whose lives we touch.
Glacial Lakes Conservancy, as a land trust, is a nonprofit organization that, as part of its mission, actively works to conserve land by undertaking or assisting in land or conservation easement acquisitions.
Supporting the tax exempt purpose of lutheran social services of wisconsin and upper michigan, inc.
The mission of lad lake, inc. is to guide the growth of at-risk youth so that they reach their potential and live responsibly.
The door county land trust is a local, non-governmental non-profit organization whose mission is to preserve door county's exceptional lands and waters forever.
Our mission is conserving West Michigans ecologically critical land. We protect land by creating public nature preserves, providing support to communities and local governments in creating natural areas, and helping private landowners…
Serving our members, where they are, through all stages of life.
To support university of wisconsin la crosse by building and maintaining relationships among students, alumni, friends and the university.
The purpose of the corporation shall be to actively facilitate and promote economic development and business retention in the la crosse area. this shall be accomplished by focusing on the "triad of development": the attraction of industry,…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is La Crosse Community Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Sustainable Driftless Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 40 years old; the field is 20. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 5% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
24 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 24 of the 34 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds FRIENDS OF RIVERSIDE PARK INC ↗
- Who funds MISSISSIPPI VALLEY CONSERVANCY INC ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF THE SPARTA FREE LIBRARY ↗
- Who funds La Crosse Area Family Young Men's Christian Association Inc ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF SPARTA INC ↗
- Who funds LA CROSSE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds LA CROSSE NEIGHBORHOODS INC ↗
- Who funds COULEE COUNCIL ON ADDICTIONS INC ↗
- Who funds Gundersen Lutheran Medical Center Inc ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF SPARTA PUBLIC LIBRARY IN ↗
- Who funds Gundersen Lutheran Medical Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds WAFER INC ↗
- Who funds SUSTAINABLE DRIFTLESS INC ↗
- Who funds THE ALS ASSOCIATION INC WISCONSIN CHAPTER ↗
- Who funds COULEE REGION HUMANE SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA 624 GATEWAY AREA COUNCIL ↗
- Who funds Hunger Task Force of La Crosse Inc ↗
- Who funds THE PARENTING PLACE INC ↗
- Who funds FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF LA CROSSE INC ↗
- Who funds VITERBO UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds HORSESENSE FOR SPECIAL RIDERS INC ↗
- Who funds LA CROSSE COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds American Players Theatre of Wisconsin Inc ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: La Crosse Community Foundation · Cleary-Kumm Foundation Inc · Smith Russell & Vera Private Fdn Xxxxxx4172 · Mayo Clinic Group Return · Sue Anne Gelatt Foundation · Gundersen Lutheran Administrative Services Inc · Xcel Energy Foundation · John & Kathy Reinhart Family Foundation · Lyche Family Foundation Inc · Alm Charities Inc · Otto Bremer Trust · Dahl Family Foundation Xxxxxx6214
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Pmg Foundation Inc Agy - Uma 1035017881 funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.