· Private foundation
Dahl Family Foundation Xxxxxx6214
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 54% of DAHL FAMILY FOUNDATION XXXXXX6214’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k3 grants · $8k
- $10k–50k3 grants · $30k
- $50k–250k4 grants · $255k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Gateway Area Council | $105,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $50,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $50,000 |
| FAMILY & CHILDREN'S CENTER | $50,000 |
| COULEE REGION HUMANE SOCIETY | $10,000 |
| WINONA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC | $10,000 |
| WATDA FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| GUNDERSEN MEDICAL FOUNDATION | $2,500 |
| Aquinas Catholic Schools Inc | $2,500 |
| ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL | $2,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $450k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
27 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2025, 18 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- FAFAMILY AND CHILDREN'S CENTER INC9× · 2017–2025 · $450k · revenue +25%
- GLGundersen Lutheran Medical Foundation Inc9× · 2017–2025 · $383k · revenue +28%
- BABOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF GREATER LA CROSS5× · 2017–2021 · $300k · revenue +299%
Funded once
- BABoys and Girls Clubs of Greaterone grant, 2022 · $50k
- HFHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF THE GREATER LACROSSE REGION INCgraduatedone grant, 2019 · $30k · revenue +54%
- WHWINONA HABITAT FOR HUMANITYone grant, 2018 · $30k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The purpose of the corporation shall be to actively facilitate and promote economic development and business retention in the la crosse area. this shall be accomplished by focusing on the "triad of development": the attraction of industry,…
The door county land trust is a local, non-governmental non-profit organization whose mission is to preserve door county's exceptional lands and waters forever.
To support university of wisconsin la crosse by building and maintaining relationships among students, alumni, friends and the university.
The purpose of the association shall be to restore and conserve wisconsin's waterfowl and wetland resources; to educate state waterfowlers during their progression from natural resource consumer to steward; and to promote governmental…
Landmark conservancy is a nationally accredited, nonprofit conservation organization serving 20 counties across northwest wisconsin. their mission is to conserve wisconsin's natural legacy for everyone...forever.
To share christ's love as we serve the spiritual, physical, intellectual and emotional needs of people entrusted to our care and others whose lives we touch.
Lawrence university of wisconsin, through its undergraduate residential college and conservatory of music, educates students in the liberal arts and sciences. the university is devoted to excellence and integrity in all of its activities…
Rush wisconsin west is committed to providing an unrivaled soccer experience for players of all abilities and age levels. we accept the responsibility of teaching life lessons to our athletes to further their growth inside the game and out…
To be a progressive business resource, growing companies and developing leaders through collaboration, advocacy, information, and services that benefit current and future businesses.
The weber center for the performing arts is a collaborative venue supporting the missions of la crosse community theatre and viterbo university. the weber center serves as a performance and administrative center for la crosse community…
To protect, conserve, and enhance wisconsin's natural resources by advocating for and supporting county conservation efforts, for current and future generations.
To promote oshkosh and winnebago county a premier destination for corporate, sports, and leisure groups and individual visitors.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is La Crosse Community Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Coulee Alpine Racing Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 52 years old; the field is 49. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 14% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
27 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 27 of the 49 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds Gundersen Lutheran Medical Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF GREATER LA CROSS ↗
- Who funds COULEE COUNCIL ON ADDICTIONS INC ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF LA CROSSE INC ↗
- Who funds THE FOUNDATION OF THE WISCONSIN AUTOMOBILE & TRUCK DEALERS ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds WINONA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds GREAT RIVER SHAKESPEARE FESTIVAL ↗
- Who funds LA CROSSE COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF THE GREATER LACROSSE REGION INC ↗
- Who funds La Crosse Community Theatre ↗
- Who funds LA CROSSE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
- Who funds HUNGER TASK FORCE INC ↗
- Who funds COULEE REGION HUMANE SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds VESTERHEIM NORWEGIAN-AMERICAN MUSEUM ↗
- Who funds LA CROSSE SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC ↗
- Who funds MORRIE MILLER ATHLETIC FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds LA CROSSE PUBLIC EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds LA CRESCENT AREA EVENT CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds MISSISSIPPI VALLEY CONSERVANCY INC ↗
- Who funds YOUTH SHELTERS & FAMILY SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds HOPE HARBOR ↗
- Who funds OUTDOOR RECREATION ALLIANCE OF THE SEVEN RIVERS REGION INC ↗
- Who funds GREAT RIVERS UNITED WAY INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: La Crosse Community Foundation · Mayo Clinic Group Return · Cleary-Kumm Foundation Inc · Smith Russell & Vera Private Fdn Xxxxxx4172 · Lyche Family Foundation Inc · Sue Anne Gelatt Foundation · Xcel Energy Foundation · Alm Charities Inc · The Pmg Foundation Inc Agy - Uma 1035017881 · Locher Family Foundation Trust Xxxxxx1227 · June Onefive Foundation Inc · John & Kathy Reinhart Family Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Dahl Family Foundation Xxxxxx6214 funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Dahl Family Foundation Xxxxxx6214?
Find your warmest path to Dahl Family Foundation Xxxxxx6214 through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.