Skip to content
The Pmg Foundation Inc Agy - Uma Xxxxxx7881 at a glance

· Private foundation

The Pmg Foundation Inc Agy - Uma Xxxxxx7881

Its FY2026 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$410k
Granted FY2026still arriving
12
Grants FY2026still arriving
3
States reached
$75k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Health$770kRecreation & Sports$680kYouth Development$400kEnvironment$308kEducation$255kHuman Services$215kPhilanthropy$110kCommunity Improvement$107kOther$0
02FY2026 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2026

  • Under $10k1 grant · $5k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $125k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $280k
$35,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$11M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MAYO CLINIC$75,000
LA CROSSE COUNTY HISTORICAL$55,000
BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA GATEWAY AREA$50,000
LA CROSSE AREA FAMILY YMCA INC$50,000
La Crosse Community Foundation$50,000
Hellships Memorial Foundation$35,000
THE PARENTING PLACE INC$35,000
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF SPARTA$25,000
COURTE OREILLES LAKE ASSOCIATION$10,000
MISSISSIPPI VALLEY CONSERVANCY$10,000
Friends of Riverside Park$10,000
ALS ASSOCIATION INC$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY25–25, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 14%Horse Sense for Special Riders: $5k → 12%Family & Children's Center: $5k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.8M · 16 repeat orgs$407k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +30% since the first grant, against +12% for those funded once.

16 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2026, 8 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2026 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
17

Total granted

$2.8M
$307k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+30%
+12%

Still filing today

63%
71%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2026, 72% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $100k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
HealthArts & CultureCommunity ImprovementFood & NutritionEnvironmentYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FO
    FRIENDS OF RIVERSIDE PARK INC
    4× · 2023–2026 · $680k · revenue +97% · 48% of their budget
  • MISSISSIPPI VALLEY CONSERVANCY INC
    6× · 2020–2026 · $295k · revenue +145%
  • LC
    La Crosse Area Family Young Men's Christian Association Inc
    5× · 2021–2026 · $250k · revenue +16%

Funded once

  • GL
    Gundersen Lutheran Medical Foundation Inc
    one grant, 2021 · $50k · revenue -20%
  • GL
    Gundersen Lutheran Medical Center Incgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $50k · revenue +35%
  • FO
    FRIENDS OF SPARTA PUBLIC LIBRARY IN
    one grant, 2020 · $50k · revenue +2%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
La Crosse Community Theatre

To honor and celebrate our rich theatrical heritage while establishing a sustainable foundation for the years to come.

Arts & Culture
2
Glacial Lakes Conservancy Inc

Glacial Lakes Conservancy, as a land trust, is a nonprofit organization that, as part of its mission, actively works to conserve land by undertaking or assisting in land or conservation easement acquisitions.

Environment
3
Wisconsin Land and Water Conservation Association Inc

To protect, conserve, and enhance wisconsin's natural resources by advocating for and supporting county conservation efforts, for current and future generations.

Environment
4
Landmark Conservancy Inc

Landmark conservancy is a nationally accredited, nonprofit conservation organization serving 20 counties across northwest wisconsin. their mission is to conserve wisconsin's natural legacy for everyone...forever.

Environment
5
Land Conservancy of West Michigan

Our mission is conserving West Michigans ecologically critical land. We protect land by creating public nature preserves, providing support to communities and local governments in creating natural areas, and helping private landowners…

Environment
6
University of Wisconsin La Crosse - Alumni Association

To support university of wisconsin la crosse by building and maintaining relationships among students, alumni, friends and the university.

—
7
Wisconsin Lutheran Home Ministries Inc

To share christ's love as we serve the spiritual, physical, intellectual and emotional needs of people entrusted to our care and others whose lives we touch.

—
8
Door County Land Trust Inc

The door county land trust is a local, non-governmental non-profit organization whose mission is to preserve door county's exceptional lands and waters forever.

Environment
9
Southeast Wisconsin Land Conservancy

Obtain and manage land of ecological significance.

Environment
10
La Crosse Area Development Corp

The purpose of the corporation shall be to actively facilitate and promote economic development and business retention in the la crosse area. this shall be accomplished by focusing on the "triad of development": the attraction of industry,…

—
11
Lad Lake Inc

The mission of lad lake, inc. is to guide the growth of at-risk youth so that they reach their potential and live responsibly.

—
12
Lss Foundation Inc

Supporting the tax exempt purpose of lutheran social services of wisconsin and upper michigan, inc.

Housing & Shelter
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is La Crosse Community Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Sustainable Driftless Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

25 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 25 of the 37 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

4
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
24/25
Grantees still filing
18/25
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MAYO CLINIC: $550,000 · OtherMAYO CLINICLa Crosse Area Family Young Men's Christian Association Inc: $250,000 · OtherLa Crosse Area Family Young Men's Christian Associ…Individual grant recipient: $125,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientBOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA GATEWAY AREA: $125,000 · OtherBOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA GATEWAY AREABoys & Girls Club of Holmen: $75,000 · OtherLA CROSSE COUNTY HISTORICAL: $55,000 · OtherFRIENDS OF SPARTA PUBLIC LIBRARY IN: $50,000 · Other+17 more: $269,500 · Other+17 moreFRIENDS OF RIVERSIDE PARK INC: $680,000 · Community ImprovementFRIENDS OF RIVERSIDE PARK …LA CROSSE NEIGHBORHOODS INC: $106,670 · Community ImprovementLA CROSSE NEIGHBORHOODS IN…MISSISSIPPI VALLEY CONSERVANCY INC: $295,000 · EnvironmentMISSISSIPP…+1 more: $10,000 · EnvironmentBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF SPARTA INC: $200,000 · Youth DevelopmentBOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA 624 GATEWAY AREA COUNCIL: $10,000 · Youth DevelopmentFRIENDS OF THE SPARTA FREE LIBRARY: $200,000 · Education+1 more: $5,000 · EducationGundersen Lutheran Medical Foundation Inc: $50,000 · HealthGundersen Lutheran Medical Center Inc: $50,000 · HealthCOULEE COUNCIL ON ADDICTIONS INC: $50,000 · HealthTHE ALS ASSOCIATION INC WISCONSIN CHAPTER: $20,000 · HealthLA CROSSE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $160,000 · Philanthropy
Other$1,499,500Community Improvement$786,670Environment$305,000Youth Development$210,000Education$205,000Health$170,000Philanthropy$160,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFRIENDS OF RIVERSIDE PARK INC: $680,000 over 4y, 48% of budgetMISSISSIPPI VALLEY CONSERVANCY INC: $295,000 over 6y, 5.0% of budgetLa Crosse Area Family Young Men's Christian Association Inc: $250,000 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF SPARTA INC: $200,000 over 7y, 7.7% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE SPARTA FREE LIBRARY: $200,000 over 3y, 95% of budgetLA CROSSE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $160,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetLA CROSSE NEIGHBORHOODS INC: $106,670 over 3y, 28% of budgetGundersen Lutheran Medical Foundation Inc: $50,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGundersen Lutheran Medical Center Inc: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOULEE COUNCIL ON ADDICTIONS INC: $50,000 over 2y, 5.6% of budgetTHE PARENTING PLACE INC: $45,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetWAFER INC: $25,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetSUSTAINABLE DRIFTLESS INC: $22,500 over 2y, 28% of budgetTHE ALS ASSOCIATION INC WISCONSIN CHAPTER: $20,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetBOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA 624 GATEWAY AREA COUNCIL: $10,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetHunger Task Force of La Crosse Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetCOULEE REGION HUMANE SOCIETY INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetVITERBO UNIVERSITY: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF LA CROSSE INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetAmerican Players Theatre of Wisconsin Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLA CROSSE COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $1,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

La Crosse Community F…Cleary-Kumm Foundatio…Smith Russell & Vera …Mayo Clinic Group Ret…Sue Anne Gelatt Found…Gundersen Lutheran Ad…Xcel Energy FoundationJohn & Kathy Reinhart…Lyche Family Foundati…Alm Charities IncOtto Bremer TrustDahl Family Foundatio…
La Crosse Community FoundationWI38.7× affinity16 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: La Crosse Community Foundation · Cleary-Kumm Foundation Inc · Smith Russell & Vera Private Fdn Xxxxxx4172 · Mayo Clinic Group Return · Sue Anne Gelatt Foundation · Gundersen Lutheran Administrative Services Inc · Xcel Energy Foundation · John & Kathy Reinhart Family Foundation · Lyche Family Foundation Inc · Alm Charities Inc · Otto Bremer Trust · Dahl Family Foundation Xxxxxx6214

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Pmg Foundation Inc Agy - Uma Xxxxxx7881 funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Pmg Foundation Inc Agy - Uma Xxxxxx7881. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 37 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2026, released 2026. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Pmg Foundation Inc Agy - Uma Xxxxxx7881’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home