Skip to content

· Public charity

The Pimco Foundation

Our community engagement platform focuses on hunger and gender equality with the belief that these are fundamental issues critical to human development and sustainable worldwide economic growth.

$6.8M
Granted FY2024still arriving
108
Grants FY2024still arriving
15
States reached
$2.3M
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2024.

Food & Nutrition$6.7MHuman Services$1.9MPublic Benefit$951kCommunity Improvement$868kYouth Development$611kPhilanthropy$525kInternational$383kEducation$317kOther$0
02FY2024 · 108 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 108 grants below total $5,090,895, the rows itemized in this filing. The $6,766,903 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $1,676,008 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k62 grants · $90k
  • $10k–50k25 grants · $520k
  • $50k–250k18 grants · $1.6M
  • $250k+3 grants · $2.9M
$2,500
Median grant
15
States reached
$158M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
The Global FoodBanking Network$2,254,000
PULITZER CENTER ON CRISIS REPORTING$375,642
COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP OF ORANGE COUNTY$300,000
COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP OF ORANGE COUNTY$220,000
TAPFOUND INC$157,990
Just Community Inc$150,000
CENTRAL TEXAS FOOD BANK INC$100,000
TIYYA FOUNDATION INC$100,000
NEW YORK COMMON PANTRY$100,000
COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP OF ORANGE COUNTY$95,000
Austin Community Foundation$75,000
WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INCORPORATED$75,000
NEW YORK COMMON PANTRY$72,000
PYXERA GLOBAL INC$55,000
BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF CENTRAL ORANGE COAST$51,000
02Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$11M · 52 repeat orgs$1.9M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +26% since the first grant, against +14% for those funded once.

52 repeat relationships: 50 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 23 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

52
58

Total granted

$11M
$1.7M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+26%
+14%

Still filing today

90%
47%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $218k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’23’24
Human ServicesYouth DevelopmentEducationRecreation & SportsHealthInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CA
    COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP OF ORANGE COUNTY
    3× · 2021–2024 · $1.1M · revenue +15%
  • PC
    PULITZER CENTER ON CRISIS REPORTING
    3× · 2021–2024 · $951k · revenue +63%
  • BG
    BLACK GIRL VENTURES FOUNDATION
    2× · 2021–2024 · $501k · revenue +38%

Funded once

  • Freefrom
    one grant, 2021 · $500k · revenue -1%
  • NAACP LEGAL DEFENSE & EDUC FUND INCgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $250k · revenue +132%
  • OF
    OC Food Bank
    one grant, 2023 · $250k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Youthbuild Global Inc

With love and respect, we partner with opportunity youth to build the skillsets and mindsets that lead to lifelong learning, livelihood, and leadership. youthbuild strives to create a world where all young people are seen for their…

Employment
2
Coop Careers Inc

Building a movement of diverse, upwardly mobile college grads overcoming underemployment through digital skills and peer connections.

Education
3
Common Impact Inc

Common impact's mission is to strengthen the capacity of social change organizations, enabling them to better run and scale their programs. through its partnership with companies, common impact taps into the business skills and expertise…

Unclassified
4
Techbridge Inc

Techbridge breaks the cycle of generational poverty through the innovative use of technology to transform nonprofit and community impact. techbridge's work is focused on four pillars: hunger relief, homeless support, social justice and…

Philanthropy
5
Choices Coordinated Care Solutions Inc

To strengthen youth and families while enhancing systems and communities.

Human Services
6
Opportunity Partners

Mission: together we advance the quality of life for people with disabilities. vision: people of all abilities thrive in the world. values: impact- generate solutions that make a difference. choice - create opportunities for people to lead…

Employment
7
Alternatives Inc

Alternatives, inc.'s mission is to facilitate personal development,strengthen family relationships and enhance the community's well being. serving over 3,000 youth and families annually, the organization offers a range of counseling and…

Health
8
California Forward

Ca fwd drives action to identify solutions that can be taken to scale to meet the challenges the state is facing. the organization is driven by the belief that regional solutions across the state will help ensure economic, environmental,…

Public Benefit
9
Common Future

Common future is a network of pioneering leaders across the u.s. and canada who work deeply within their communities to create alternative approaches to business, philanthropy, and investing. we envision an economy that has transitioned…

Community Improvement
10
Pathways Kitchen

Pathways kitchen helps justice-impacted youth thrive over survive by providing training, work opportunities and individualized support to ensure they can chart their own path forward

Crime & Legal
11
City Year Inc

City year helps students and schools succeed, while preparing the next generation of civically engaged leaders who can work across lines of difference. partnering with teachers, teams of city year americorps members cultivate learning…

Unclassified
12
Jewish Family and Children's Service of Minneapolis

Jewish family and children's service of minneapolis provides essential services to people of all ages and backgrounds to sustain healthy relationships, ease suffering and offer support in times of need.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Oneoc; the most unlike its peers is Operation Clean Slate. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
03the grantee network

97 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 97 of the 140 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
15
Early backer (in before they grew)
96/97
Grantees still filing
60/97
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

The Global FoodBanking Network: $5,411,500 · InternationalThe Global FoodBanking NetworkWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $225,000 · International+4 more: $296,000 · InternationalCOMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP OF ORANGE COUNTY: $1,135,112 · OtherCOMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP O…OC Food Bank: $250,000 · OtherOC Food BankBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF CENTRAL ORANGE COAST: $206,000 · OtherBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF CENTRAL …TIYYA FOUNDATION INC: $227,000 · OtherTIYYA FOUNDATION INCNAACP LEGAL DEFENSE & EDUC FUND INC: $250,000 · OtherNAACP LEGAL DEFENSE & EDUC FUN…+97 more: $1,548,738 · Other+97 moreFreefrom: $500,000 · Human ServicesFreefromIllumination Health Home formerly The Illumination Foundation: $104,000 · Human ServicesIlluminat…SAFE HORIZON INC: $103,000 · Human ServicesSAFE HORI…HOT BREAD KITCHEN LTD: $100,500 · Human ServicesHOT BREAD…NEW YORK WOMEN'S FOUNDATION INC: $75,000 · Human ServicesNEW YORK …CASA TERESA INC: $52,500 · Human ServicesCOVENANT HOUSE: $52,000 · Human Services+9 more: $98,674 · Human Services+9 morePULITZER CENTER ON CRISIS REPORTING: $951,284 · Public BenefitBLACK GIRL VENTURES FOUNDATION: $501,000 · Community ImprovementJUST COMMUNITY INC: $253,000 · Community ImprovementCHARITABLE VENTURES OF ORANGE COUNTY: $50,000 · Community ImprovementNEW YORK COMMON PANTRY: $438,000 · Food & NutritionCentral Texas Food Bank Inc: $192,000 · Food & Nutrition+3 more: $22,500 · Food & NutritionTAPFOUND INC: $275,990 · PhilanthropyAUSTIN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $150,000 · PhilanthropyORANGE COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $135,000 · Philanthropy+4 more: $8,000 · Philanthropy
International$5,932,500Other$3,616,850Human Services$1,085,674Public Benefit$951,284Community Improvement$804,000Food & Nutrition$652,500Philanthropy$568,990

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetThe Global FoodBanking Network: $5,411,500 over 3y, 16% of budgetCOMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP OF ORANGE COUNTY: $1,135,112 over 3y, 1.4% of budgetPULITZER CENTER ON CRISIS REPORTING: $951,284 over 3y, 3.5% of budgetBLACK GIRL VENTURES FOUNDATION: $501,000 over 2y, 15% of budgetFreefrom: $500,000 over 1y, 4.9% of budgetNEW YORK COMMON PANTRY: $438,000 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetTAPFOUND INC: $275,990 over 2y, 1.9% of budgetJUST COMMUNITY INC: $253,000 over 2y, 6.1% of budgetNAACP LEGAL DEFENSE & EDUC FUND INC: $250,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetTIYYA FOUNDATION INC: $227,000 over 2y, 25% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $225,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF CENTRAL ORANGE COAST: $206,000 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetCentral Texas Food Bank Inc: $192,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetPYXERA GLOBAL INC: $170,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetAUSTIN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $150,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetORANGE COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $135,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetIllumination Health Home formerly The Illumination Foundation: $104,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetGIRLS INCORPORATED OF ORANGE COUNTY: $103,000 over 3y, 1.2% of budgetSAFE HORIZON INC: $103,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetHOT BREAD KITCHEN LTD: $100,500 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetGIVE2ASIA: $100,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetFIGURE SKATING IN HARLEM INC: $100,000 over 2y, 2.1% of budgetNEW YORK WOMEN'S FOUNDATION INC: $75,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetFront Steps Inc: $57,500 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetLATINITAS INC: $54,000 over 2y, 2.8% of budgetCASA TERESA INC: $52,500 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetPER SCHOLAS INC: $52,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCOVENANT HOUSE: $52,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFUTURES AND OPTIONS INC: $52,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetROCK THE STREET WALL STREET: $51,500 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetTHE WOODEN FLOOR FOR YOUTH MOVEMENT: $51,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetTHOMAS HOUSE TEMPORARY SHELTER: $51,000 over 2y, 3.0% of budgetCHARITABLE VENTURES OF ORANGE COUNTY: $50,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetHUMANITARIAN OPENSTREETMAP TEAM UNITED STATES INC: $32,250 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetNETWORK FOR TEACHING ENTREPRENEURSHIP: $31,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetKIDWORKS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORP: $27,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetSOS CHILDREN'S VILLAGES-USA INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetREFUGEE SERVICES OF TEXAS INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCASA YOUTH SHELTER: $25,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetWomen for Afghan Women Inc: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetACCESS CALIFORNIA SERVICES: $25,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF AUSTIN: $21,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetFEEDING SOUTH FLORIDA INC: $20,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetChildren's Hospital Los Angeles: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCANCER RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetJessie Rees Foundation: $18,500 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetSewa International Inc: $16,574 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHAPTER ONE NFP: $12,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Orange County Community FoundationCA37.9× affinity19 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Orange County Community Foundation · O L Halsell Foundation · Edwards Lifesciences Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · The Devto Support Foundation · Oneoc · Farmers & Merchants Bank Foundation · Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian · Austin Community Foundation Inc · Ueberroth Family Foundation · Orange County's United Way

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
04Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Pimco Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Pimco Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 140 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Pimco’s filings →

More from the funding graph