· Private foundation
The Philip Chosky Charitable & Educational Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2021–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- $10k–50k21 grants · $452k
- $50k–250k6 grants · $572k
- $250k+1 grant · $303k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| THE JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER PITTSBURGH | $303,000 |
| JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF GREATER PITTSBURGH | $230,000 |
| T OF L INC DBA TREE OF LIFE INC | $115,000 |
| CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY | $77,000 |
| FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES | $50,000 |
| COMMUNITY DAY SCHOOL | $50,000 |
| AMERICAN COMMITTEE FOR THE WEIZMANN INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE | $50,000 |
| JEWISH FAMILY AND COMMUNITY SERVICE | $45,000 |
| NATIONAL COUNCIL OF JEWISH WOMEN | $35,000 |
| THE FRIENDSHIP CIRCLE OF PITTSBURGH | $30,000 |
| QUANTUM THEATER | $30,000 |
| FILM PITTSBURGH | $30,000 |
| FRONT PORCH THEATRICALS | $30,000 |
| REPAIR THE WORLD PITTSBURGH | $30,000 |
| HILLEL JEWISH UNIVERSITY | $25,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY21–24, $905k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of -1% since the first grant, against -34% for the ones you funded once.
34 repeat relationships — 23 still active in FY2024, 11 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $52k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- YMYOUNG MEN AND WOMEN'S HEBREW ASSOCIATION AND IRENE KAUFMANN CENT2× · 2023–2024 · $360k · revenue +11%
- CMCarnegie Mellon University4× · 2021–2024 · $302k · revenue +27%
FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES4× · 2021–2024 · $262k · revenue +113%
Funded once
- EHERADICATE HATE GLOBAL SUMMITgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $100k · revenue +81%
- JAJEWISH ASSOCIATION ON AGINGone grant, 2021 · $50k · revenue -34%
- PIPITTSBURGH INTERNATIONAL CLASSIC THEATREone grant, 2022 · $40k · revenue -62%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The weitzman national museum of american jewish history, on independence mall in philadelphia, presents educational programs and experiences that preserve, explore, and celebrate the history of jews in america. its purpose is to connect…
Philadelphia jewish film and medias mission is to educate and engage diverse philadelphia communities, jewish and non-jewish alike, by presenting world-class film premieres, repertory cinema, and associated programs that are inspired by…
The mission of the jewish museum is to collect, preserve, exhibit and interpret art and jewish culture. see schedule o for more information.
The western pennsylvania jewish sports hall of fame ("wpjshf") educates jewish youth as to their heritage vis-a-vis jewish men and women who have made significant contributions to society through sports and likewise educates the general…
For over 150 years, the 92nd street y, new york has been serving its communities and the larger world by bringing people together (continued on schedule o)and providing exceptional, groundbreaking programs in the performing and visual…
Guided by jewish values and heritage, the edlavitch dc jewish community center (edcjcc) engages individuals and families through its cultural, recreational, educational, and social justice programs by welcoming people of all backgrounds to…
As the voice of the jewish community, to protect jewish interests & promote jewish ideals.
The philadelphia film society (pfs) is the region's home for classic and contemporary film presentation, education, entertainment, and community building. a nonprofit, community-supported organization, pfs produces the acclaimed…
San diego center for jewish culture ("cjc") is a california 501(c)(3) not-for-profit organization that was incorporated in january 1999. cjc is housed at lawrence family jewish community centers of san diego county. cjc provides a wide…
Provides innovative education in a dynamic urban setting. dedicated to academic excellence and community engagement,we prepare students of diverse backgrounds with the knowledge, skill,and experience to lead meaningful lives as informed…
Together with our community, jcc manhattan creates opportunities for people to connect, grow, and learn within an ever-changing jewish landscape.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jewish Federation of Greater Pittsburgh and the most unlike its peers is Eradicate Hate Global Summit. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 34 years old; the field is 20. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 16% startups (under 5 years old) — 6% of your grantees by number, and just 7% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 8% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
36 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 36 of the 47 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER PITTSBURGH ↗
- Who funds YOUNG MEN AND WOMEN'S HEBREW ASSOCIATION AND IRENE KAUFMANN CENT ↗
- Who funds Carnegie Mellon University ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES ↗
- Who funds T OF L INC ↗
- Who funds CARNEGIE INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds JEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICE OF PITTSBURGH ↗
- Who funds QUANTUM THEATRE INC ↗
- Who funds THE FRIENDSHIP CIRCLE OF PITTSBURGH INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN COMMITTEE FOR THE WEIZMANN INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE INC ↗
- Who funds The City Theatre Company Inc ↗
- Who funds FILM PITTSBURGH ↗
- Who funds The Working Group ↗
- Who funds ERADICATE HATE GLOBAL SUMMIT ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY DAY SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL COUNCIL OF JEWISH WOMEN PITTSBURGH SECTION ↗
- Who funds CENTER OF LIFE ↗
- Who funds FRONT PORCH THEATRICALS ↗
- Who funds HILLEL JEWISH UNIVERSITY CENTER ↗
- Who funds ALUMNI THEATER COMPANY ↗
- Who funds EAST END COOPERATIVE MINISTRY ↗
- Who funds PRIME STAGE ↗
- Who funds AMERICANS FOR BEN-GURION UNIVERSITY INC ↗
- Who funds JEWISH ASSOCIATION ON AGING ↗
- Who funds NORTHERN ISRAEL CENTER FOR ARTS AND TECHNOLOGY LTD ↗
- Who funds PITTSBURGH INTERNATIONAL CLASSIC THEATRE ↗
- Who funds JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA INC ↗
- Who funds SPECIAL OLYMPICS PENNSYLVANIA INC ↗
- Who funds JEWISH FAMILY ASSISTANCE FUND dba JEWISH ASSISTANCE FUND ↗
- Who funds HISTORICAL SOCIETY OF WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA ↗
- Who funds READING IS FUNDAMENTAL PITTSBURGH ↗
- Who funds HOSANNA HOUSE INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Fine Foundation · The Jack Buncher Foundation · The Pittsburgh Foundation · Jewish Federation of Greater Pittsburgh · The Heinz Endowments · The Grable Foundation · Hillman Family Foundations · Opportunity Foundation · Richard King Mellon Foundation · Staunton Farm Foundation 540-054 Dba Staunton Farm Foundation · David S Shapira Foundation · Giant Eagle Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Philip Chosky Charitable & Educational Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to The Philip Chosky Charitable & Educational Foundation?
Find your warmest path to The Philip Chosky Charitable & Educational Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.