Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Peter & Mary Chang Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$263k
Granted FY2024still arriving
18
Grants FY2024still arriving
7
States reached
$150k
Largest
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Recreation & Sports$560kEducation$474kReligion$229kHealth$190kFood & Nutrition$84kPublic Safety & Disaster$35kHuman Services$34kInternational$32kOther$0
02FY2024 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k12 grants · $26k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $87k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $150k
$3,500
Median grant
7
States reached
$5.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
U OF NOTRE DAME$150,000
FU-JEN UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL PROJECT$35,000
INDUSTRIAL EVANGELICAL MISSION FOR$20,000
AMERICAN RED CROSS$12,000
Individual grant recipient$10,150
FREE METHODIST CHURCH FOR WEISHIN T$10,000
FEEDING AMERICA$8,000
SUPERTECH FT$5,000
CATHOLIC RELIEF SERVICE$3,500
SALVATION ARMY$2,000
SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK$2,000
CATHOLIC CHARITY OF SANTA CLARA$1,000
BISHOP CIRCLE(CIRCLE OF EXCELLENCE)$1,000
CSCNA CHARITY CORPS( THROUGH KEN WA$1,000
CA PROVINCE OF SOCIETY OF JESUS THR$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $52k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 11% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%FAIMLY BRIDGE: $500 → 15%Convenant House: $1k → 17%Convenant House: $700 → 17%COVENANT HOUSE: $600 → 17%Convenant House: $600 → 17%Covenant House: $600 → 17%Covenant House: $600 → 17%Convenant House: $600 → 17%Convenant House: $450 → 17%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $12k → 8%American Red Cross: $7k → 8%Catholic Charities of Santa Clara: $3k → 8%American Red Cross: $3k → 8%Catholic Charities of Santa Clara: $3k → 8%Catholic Charities of Santa Clara: $2k → 8%American Red Cross: $2k → 8%American Red Cross: $2k → 8%American Red Cross: $2k → 8%American Red Cross: $2k → 8%Catholic Charities of Santa Clara: $2k → 8%Catholic Charities of Santa Clara: $2k → 8%Red Cross: $2k → 8%Catholic Charities of Santa Clara: $2k → 8%Catholic Charities of Santa Clara: $2k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
IN
PA
NJ
CA
MO
VA
MD
DE
DC
OK
MS
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

79%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.0M · 22 repeat orgs$259k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +40% since the first grant, against +26% for those funded once.

22 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2024, 17 since wound down; 13 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

22
28

Total granted

$1.0M
$29k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+40%
+26%

Still filing today

32%
32%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 12% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $230k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesPhilanthropyEducationReligionCommunity ImprovementArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FU
    FU-JEN UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION
    6× · 2017–2023 · $470k · revenue +63%
  • IE
    INDUSTRIAL EVANGELICAL MISSIONS INC
    3× · 2018–2020 · $60k · revenue +17%
  • Feeding America
    5× · 2020–2024 · $48k · revenue +40%

Funded once

  • CC
    Catholic Community Foundation of SC
    one grant, 2017 · $10k
  • AC
    AOGF Covid-19 Relief Campaign
    one grant, 2020 · $5k
  • CC
    CHINESE CANCER MEMORIAL FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2019 · $3k · revenue -91%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Chinese Christian Fellowship Intl

It is ccf's objective to establish training centers in communities all over the world teaching biblical truth to produce in all who are called to be leaders and participants lives in christ's fullness: 1. study god's word with life…

Religion
2
Newman University Inc

We are a catholic university named for saint john henry newman and founded by the adorers of the blood of christ for the purpose of empowering graduates to transform society. our core values (see schedule o for continuation)

Education
3
Asia Us Impact

Religious

Religion
4
Systematic Asian Leadership Trainin

Religious training: to assist the church in asia by training its leaders and equipping them to train others.

Religion
5
International Needs

International needs has the vision to transform lives and change communities by helping christian nationals serve both god and neighbor within their own countries.

—
6
Nexus Mission

Assist missionaries form asian churches to integrate effectively into the target culture together with teir field partners and help them to undertake god-honoring initiatives which help the neediest people

Religion
7
Foreign Mission Foundation
—
8
Vietnamese Franciscan Vocation & Mission

To assist Vietnamese Franciscan Friars (OFM) in promoting the evangelization and charity mission of St Francis of Assisi in Vietnam.

Religion
9
Shanghai Jiao Tong University Foundation of America (Sjtufa)
Education
10
Global Faith Network
Human Services
11
Human Rights in China Inc

Human rights in china, founded by chinese students and scholars in march 1989, is an international, chinese, nongovernmental organization with a mission to promote international human rights and advance the institutional protection of…

International
12
Onggi Mission
Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is American Online Giving Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Industrial Evangelical Missions Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 65 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/21
Grantees still filing
15/21
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

U OF NOTRE DAME: $150,000 · OtherU OF NOTRE DAMEIndividual grant recipient: $149,075 · OtherIndividual grant recipientEvangelical Missions for Weislin: $60,000 · OtherEvangelical Missions for WeislinFREE METHODIST CHURCH OF NORTH AMERICA: $40,000 · OtherFREE METHODIST CHURCH OF NORTH AMERICAFU-JEN UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL PROJECT: $35,000 · OtherFU-JEN UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL PROJECTCatholic Relief ServicesCRS: $26,000 · Other+41 more: $157,853 · Other+41 moreUniversity of Notre Dame du Lac: $560,000 · EducationUniversity of Notre Dame du Lac+3 more: $8,500 · EducationFU-JEN UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $470,000 · PhilanthropyFU-JEN UNIVERSITY FOUNDATIONINDUSTRIAL EVANGELICAL MISSIONS INC: $60,000 · PhilanthropyINDUSTRIAL EVANGELICAL MISSIONS I…+3 more: $3,566 · PhilanthropyAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $31,500 · Human ServicesCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SANTA CLARA COUNTY: $14,520 · Human ServicesCOVENANT HOUSE: $5,150 · Human Services+2 more: $872 · Human ServicesFeeding America: $48,000 · Food & NutritionBIBLE STUDY FELLOWSHIP: $1,000 · ReligionSt Francis Xavier Lay Missionary Societ: $500 · ReligionOAKLAND CHINATOWN CHAMBER FOUNDATION dba OCCF: $500 · Community Improvement
Other$617,928Education$568,500Philanthropy$533,566Human Services$52,042Food & Nutrition$48,000Religion$1,500Community Improvement$500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUniversity of Notre Dame du Lac: $560,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetFU-JEN UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $470,000 over 6y, 7.0% of budgetINDUSTRIAL EVANGELICAL MISSIONS INC: $60,000 over 3y, 11% of budgetFeeding America: $48,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $31,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SANTA CLARA COUNTY: $14,520 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetCOVENANT HOUSE: $5,150 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetSupertech FT Corp: $5,000 over 1y, 68% of budgetCHINESE CANCER MEMORIAL FOUNDATION: $3,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetBIBLE STUDY FELLOWSHIP: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOAKLAND CHINATOWN CHAMBER FOUNDATION dba OCCF: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetKQED INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCALIFORNIA LUTHERAN UNIVERSITY: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSt Francis Xavier Lay Missionary Societ: $500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetMISSIONARY SISTERS OF MARY IMMACULATE INC: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFAMILY BRIDGE INC: $500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetAMERICAN ONLINE GIVING FOUNDATION INC: $466 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAIM HIGH: $372 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGOFUNDMEORG: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds University of Notre Dame du Lac ↗
  • Who funds FU-JEN UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds INDUSTRIAL EVANGELICAL MISSIONS INC ↗
  • Who funds Feeding America ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SANTA CLARA COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds COVENANT HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds Supertech FT Corp ↗
  • Who funds Cscna Charity Corps Inc ↗
  • Who funds CHINESE CANCER MEMORIAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BIBLE STUDY FELLOWSHIP ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Endowment FoundationOH8.2× affinity5 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Peter & Mary Chang Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Peter & Mary Chang Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%5%19%42%75%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Peter & Mary Chang Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Peter & Mary Chang Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 65 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Peter & Mary Chang’s filings →

    More from the funding graph