Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Pershing Square Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$11M
Granted FY2024still arriving
56
Grants FY2024still arriving
9
States reached
$750k
Largest
01What you fund
0199% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202024.

Health$38MEducation$29MPhilanthropy$27MArts & Culture$13MSocial Science$6.9MScience & Tech$4.0MPublic Safety & Disaster$4.0MCrime & Legal$3.5MOther$0
02FY2024 · 56 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $8k
  • $10k–50k12 grants · $185k
  • $50k–250k12 grants · $2.2M
  • $250k+31 grants · $8.6M
$250,000
Median grant
9
States reached
$415M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE BROAD INSTITUTE OF MIT AND HARVARD$750,000
AMCHAI$500,000
THE ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY$300,000
ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI$250,000
CORNELL UNIVERSITY$250,000
REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO$250,000
STANFORD UNIVERSITY$250,000
MEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING CANCER CENTER$250,000
TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK$250,000
NEW YORK UNIVERSITY$250,000
TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK$250,000
MEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING CANCER CENTER$250,000
NEW YORK UNIVERSITY$250,000
ALBERT EINSTEIN COLLEGE OF MEDICINE$250,000
THE ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY$250,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–23, $1.3M) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 92% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%Redeemer Center for Life: $10k → 11%CONNECTSAFELY INC: $100k → 8%CHALLENGED ATHLETES FOUNDATION: $50k → 11%Challenged Athletes Inc: $25k → 11%NEIGHBORS LINK: $100k → 9%Willing Heart Community Care Center Inc: $20k → 16%INNOCENCE PROJECT INC: $1.0M → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

ME
NH
WA
MN
IL
NY
MA
IA
IN
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
CO
MO
VA
MD
DE
DC
GA
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 20% of The Pershing Square Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 62% of the giving stays in NY; read by stated purpose it is 59% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

The Pershing Square Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 6.2% directed abroad (not shown)

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

56%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$62M · 42 repeat orgs$48M to everyone else

42 repeat relationships — 17 still active in FY2024, 25 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

42
77

Total granted

$62M
$46M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+18%
+31%

Still filing today

69%
77%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 84% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.6M went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHealthArts & CultureHuman ServicesRecreation & SportsInternationalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • VC
    VASSAR COLLEGE
    2× · 2020–2021 · $4.0M · revenue +43%
  • TR
    THE ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY
    5× · 2020–2024 · $3.5M · revenue +1%
  • CS
    COLD SPRING HARBOR LABORATORY
    4× · 2020–2024 · $2.2M · revenue +26%

Funded once

  • TM
    THE MOUNT SINAI HOSPITALgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $21M · revenue +31%
  • SN
    SHED NYC INC
    one grant, 2021 · $8.0M · revenue -32%
  • FI
    FIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND - FIDELITY DAF
    one grant, 2022 · $4.0M

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
2
The Trustees of Princeton University

Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…

Education
3
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

4
Manhattanville University

To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.

Education
5
Stony Brook Internists University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
6
Neurology Associates of Stony Brook University Faculty Practice Corp

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
7
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

8
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
9
American Association for the Advancement of Science

Advance science, engineering, and innovation throughout the world for the benefit of all. the world's largest multidisciplinary scientific society and a leading publisher of cutting-edge research through its science family of journals,…

Science & Tech
10
Stony Brook Surgical Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
11
New York School of Interior Design

New york school of interior design provides the most innovative, immersive, and transformative interior design education in the world, demonstrating the impact of professionally designed interiors on the health, happiness, and well-being…

Education
12
Stony Brook Urology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Fund for Public Housing Inc and the most unlike its peers is Metastasis Research Society Inc H Lee Moffitt Cancer Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Community College Foundatio…Policy Research and AdvocacyEnvironmental Conservation …Community Arts CentersJewish Community Organizati…Cancer Support ServicesFood Banks and PantriesYouth Development ServicesWomen & Girls Leadership De…Dance Arts OrganizationsAffordable Housing Developm…Community FoundationsYouth Sports ProgramsIndependent K-12 SchoolsHealth Access Advocacy and …
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 27 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number19%2%<5yr14%9%5–10yr20%26%10–20yr19%28%20–35yr13%16%35–55yr16%20%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value19%1%<5yr14%3%5–10yr20%27%10–20yr19%8%20–35yr13%21%35–55yr16%41%55yr+

The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/111
the rest of the field
10%
11,858/120,649

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

103 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 103 of the 138 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
15
Early backer (in before they grew)
103/103
Grantees still filing
76/103
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD — $6,925,426 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF OXFORDMemorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center — $6,799,522 · OtherMemorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer CenterFIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND - FIDELITY DAF — $4,000,000 · OtherFIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FU…VASSAR COLLEGE — $4,000,000 · OtherVASSAR COLLEGEIndividual grant recipient — $2,000,000 · OtherRECIDIVIZ INC — $2,000,000 · OtherCOLD SPRING HARBOR LABORATORY — $2,232,542 · Other+64 more — $20,345,131 · Other+64 moreTHE MOUNT SINAI HOSPITAL — $20,504,426 · HealthTHE MOUNT SINAI HOS…The Broad Institute Inc — $1,750,000 · HealthThe Broad Institute…+12 more — $987,500 · HealthPresident and Fellows of Harvard College — $5,705,219 · EducationPresident and Fello…THE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK — $3,700,000 · EducationTHE TRUSTEES OF COL…THE ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY — $3,549,808 · EducationTHE ROCKEFELLER UNI…Cornell University — $1,930,000 · EducationCornell UniversityNew York University — $1,792,000 · EducationNew York UniversityICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI — $1,605,000 · EducationICAHN SCHOOL OF MED…DALTON SCHOOLS INC — $1,300,727 · EducationDALTON SCHOOLS INC+16 more — $3,653,000 · Education+16 moreNEW VENTURE FUND — $13,750,000 · EnvironmentNEW VENTURE…+1 more — $10,000 · EnvironmentROBIN HOOD FOUNDATION — $12,100,000 · PhilanthropyROBIN HOOD…AMCHAI INC — $500,000 · Philanthropy+4 more — $166,000 · PhilanthropySHED NYC INC — $8,000,000 · Arts & CultureSHED NYC I…SIGNATURE THEATRE COMPANY INC — $3,255,219 · Arts & CultureSIGNATURE …LINCOLN CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS INC — $1,000,182 · Arts & CultureLINCOLN CE…+10 more — $505,000 · Arts & CultureGlobal Impact — $1,300,000 · InternationalINSTITUTE OF INTERNATIONAL EDUCATION INC — $552,000 · InternationalPOLARIS PROJECT — $250,000 · InternationalMATI USA - THE JERUSALEM BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT CENTER INC — $250,000 · InternationalONE ACRE FUND — $250,000 · InternationalALEPH SOCIETY INC — $187,383 · International+3 more — $60,000 · International
Other$48,302,621Health$23,241,926Education$23,235,754Environment$13,760,000Philanthropy$12,766,000Arts & Culture$12,760,401International$2,849,383

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE MOUNT SINAI HOSPITAL — $20,504,426 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetNEW VENTURE FUND — $13,750,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetROBIN HOOD FOUNDATION — $12,100,000 over 4y, 2.4% of budgetSHED NYC INC — $8,000,000 over 1y, 17% of budgetPresident and Fellows of Harvard College — $5,705,219 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetVASSAR COLLEGE — $4,000,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK — $3,700,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY — $3,549,808 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetSIGNATURE THEATRE COMPANY INC — $3,255,219 over 3y, 15% of budgetCOLD SPRING HARBOR LABORATORY — $2,232,542 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetRECIDIVIZ INC — $2,000,000 over 1y, 21% of budgetCornell University — $1,930,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNew York University — $1,792,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetThe Broad Institute Inc — $1,750,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI — $1,605,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED STATES OLYMPIC AND PARALYMPIC FOUNDATION — $1,325,000 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetDALTON SCHOOLS INC — $1,300,727 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetGlobal Impact — $1,300,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetLINCOLN CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS INC — $1,000,182 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetTHE INNOCENCE PROJECT INC — $1,000,000 over 1y, 3.1% of budgetFIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND — $750,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJUNIOR TENNIS CHAMPIONS CENTER INC — $700,000 over 2y, 6.2% of budgetAMERICAN ALUMNI OF GLASGOW UNIVERSITY — $600,000 over 3y, 14% of budgetLANKENAU INSTITUTE FOR MEDICAL RESEARCH — $600,000 over 3y, 1.9% of budgetINSTITUTE OF INTERNATIONAL EDUCATION INC — $552,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetAMCHAI INC — $500,000 over 1y, 76% of budgetVERA INSTITUTE OF JUSTICE INC — $500,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY — $500,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMassachusetts Institute of Technology — $500,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY — $500,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHARLEM ACADEMY — $500,000 over 1y, 5.1% of budgetUNITED STATES OLYMPIC AND PARALYMPIC COMMITTEE — $475,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetDONORSCHOOSEORG — $293,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetREVIVE & RESTORE — $250,000 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetCitizens' Alliance Inc — $250,000 over 1y, 85% of budgetPOLARIS PROJECT — $250,000 over 1y, 2.8% of budgetMATI USA - THE JERUSALEM BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT CENTER INC — $250,000 over 1y, 41% of budgetONE ACRE FUND — $250,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetThe Research Foundation for The State University of New York — $200,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSAIL TO PREVAIL — $200,000 over 2y, 17% of budgetNEW YORK JUNIOR TENNIS LEAGUE INC — $200,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetROW NEW YORK INC — $200,000 over 2y, 1.9% of budgetALEPH SOCIETY INC — $187,383 over 1y, 15% of budgetSILK ROAD PROJECT INC — $150,000 over 1y, 7.2% of budgetGREENWAVE ORGANIZATION CORP — $150,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetNYC FIRST Inc — $150,000 over 1y, 7.5% of budgetIDEAS IN ACTION INC — $125,000 over 1y, 16% of budgetChildren's Hospital Corporation — $125,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE MOUNT SINAI HOSPITAL
  • Who funds NEW VENTURE FUND
  • Who funds ROBIN HOOD FOUNDATION
  • Who funds SHED NYC INC
  • Who funds President and Fellows of Harvard College
  • Who funds VASSAR COLLEGE
  • Who funds THE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK
  • Who funds THE ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds SIGNATURE THEATRE COMPANY INC
  • Who funds COLD SPRING HARBOR LABORATORY
  • Who funds RECIDIVIZ INC
  • Who funds Cornell University
  • Who funds New York University
  • Who funds The Broad Institute Inc
  • Who funds ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI
  • Who funds UNITED STATES OLYMPIC AND PARALYMPIC FOUNDATION
  • Who funds DALTON SCHOOLS INC
  • Who funds Global Impact
  • Who funds LINCOLN CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS INC
  • Who funds THE INNOCENCE PROJECT INC
  • Who funds FIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND
  • Who funds JUNIOR TENNIS CHAMPIONS CENTER INC
  • Who funds AMERICAN ALUMNI OF GLASGOW UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds LANKENAU INSTITUTE FOR MEDICAL RESEARCH
  • Who funds INSTITUTE OF INTERNATIONAL EDUCATION INC
  • Who funds AMCHAI INC
  • Who funds VERA INSTITUTE OF JUSTICE INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Communal FundNY33.7× affinity28 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Communal Fund · The New York Community Trust · The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Jewish Community Federation of San Francisco the Peninsula Marin & Sonoma · California Community Foundation · The Ayco Charitable Foundation · Boston Foundation Inc · The Chicago Community Trust · Marin Community Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Pershing Square Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 130%6%23%51%90%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 10%
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology35% of income from government
  • The Broad Institute Inc19% of income from government
  • Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology14% of income from government
  • Johns Hopkins University12% of income from government
  • Children's Hospital Corporation10% of income from government
  • President and Fellows of Harvard College7% of income from government
  • Whitehead Institute for Biomedical Research7% of income from government
  • Silk Road Project Inc4% of income from government
  • Year Up Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
13get no government money at all
16report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Pershing Square Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Pershing Square Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 138 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph