· Private foundation
The Peoples Futures Foundation Inc
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| OUT IN THE OPEN | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–22, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 60% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +75% since the first grant, against +17% for the ones you funded once.
6 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- APAsian Pacific Islander Domestic Violence Resource Project2× · 2020–2022 · $2k · revenue +75%
- OFORGANIZATION FOR REFUGEE AND2× · 2020–2021 · $2k · revenue +212%
- VNVERMONT NETWORK AGAINST DOMESTIC AN SEXUAL VIOLENCE INC2× · 2020–2022 · $500 · revenue +92%
Funded once
- WOWOMEN OF COLOR NETWORK INCone grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue -16%
- TWTHE WOVEN COLLECTIVE INCone grant, 2020 · $10k
- SASOUTHEAST ASIAN MUTUAL ASSISTANCE ASSOCIATIONS COALITION INCone grant, 2020 · $1k · revenue +19%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Womankind uses the multidimensionality of its asian heritage to work alongside survivors of gender-based violence as they build a path to healing.
To eliminate domestic violence and sexual assault and to empower victims through education, service, and social change.
Provide emergency shelter and transportation, 24 hr crisis line, advocacy and ongoing support groups for victims of domestic violence or sexual assault.
The mission of domestic violence and sexual assault services is to support individuals affected by domestic violence, sexual assault, and sexual exploitation, and to lead the community toward ending these abuses of power.
To assist in identifying and mediating the changes needed to reduce domestic violence and sexual assault against Native American women and their families. To raise awareness, educate, and provide technical assistance, training and…
The Network is a group of 40+ member organizations dedicated to improving the lives of those impacted by gender-based violence through education, public policy and advocacy, and connecting community members with direct service providers.…
Through a collective voice, the Wyoming Coalition Against Domestic Violence and Sexual Assault is committed to provide leadership, education, and systems advocacy to advance social change and end violence.
To prevent voilence and domestic abuse against survivors of abuse of marginalized population
To represent victim/survivors of relationship abuse and member programs; challenge systems and institutions; promote social change; and support, educate, and connect member programs.
The network provides counseling, shelter and emergency care for victims of domestic abuse.
DVSN works in collaboration with communities to end domestic violence We strive to empower and educate all peoples in ways that respect their dignity and choices while promoting their safety.
Domestic violence project, inc. promotes awareness and provides emergency and support services to all those impacted by domestic violence.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Center for Hope & Healing Inc and the most unlike its peers is Out in the Open Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds OUT IN THE OPEN INC ↗
- Who funds WOMEN OF COLOR NETWORK INC ↗
- Who funds Asian Pacific Islander Domestic Violence Resource Project ↗
- Who funds WABANAKI WOMENS COALITION INC ↗
- Who funds ORGANIZATION FOR REFUGEE AND ↗
- Who funds SOUTHEAST ASIAN MUTUAL ASSISTANCE ASSOCIATIONS COALITION INC ↗
- Who funds LA CLINICA DEL PUEBLO INC ↗
- Who funds CENTER FOR HOPE & HEALING INC ↗
- Who funds MUSLIM JUSTICE LEAGUE ↗
- Who funds HAVEN VIOLENCE PREVENTION AND SUPPORT SERVICES ↗
- Who funds VERMONT NETWORK AGAINST DOMESTIC AN SEXUAL VIOLENCE INC ↗
- Who funds REACH BEYOND DOMESTIC VIOLENCE INC ↗
- Who funds NATIVE PLANT TRUST INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Boston Foundation Inc · Eastern Bank Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Network for Good · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Peoples Futures Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Center for Hope & Healing Inc — 73% of income from government
- Reach Beyond Domestic Violence Inc — 53% of income from government
- Out in the Open Inc — 25% of income from government
- Native Plant Trust Inc — 3% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to The Peoples Futures Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to The Peoples Futures Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.