Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Patel Family Private Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$22k
Granted FY2025still arriving
3
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What you fund
0181% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Public Benefit$750kEducation$154kHuman Services$28kYouth Development$24kHealth$13kPhilanthropy$8kPublic Safety & Disaster$5kReligion$5kOther$0
02FY2025 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $12k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$7,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$618k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TULANE UNIVERSITY$10,000
Individual grant recipient$7,000
COOMBS$5,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–19, $24k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $500 → 14%REDBIRD MINISTRIES: $13k → 14%REDBIRD MINISTRIES: $10k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WA
MN
NY
MA
WY
PA
CT
RI
CA
CO
MD
TN
NC
DC
LA
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

14%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$141k · 10 repeat orgs$886k to everyone else

10 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
24

Total granted

$141k
$886k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+19%
+26%

Still filing today

30%
54%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthHuman ServicesAnimalsRecreation & SportsEnvironmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TA
    THE ADMINISTRATORS OF THE TULANE EDUCATIONAL FUND
    4× · 2022–2025 · $40k · revenue +19%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    4× · 2022–2025 · $28k
  • RM
    Redbird Ministries
    2× · 2018–2019 · $23k · revenue -63%

Funded once

  • FC
    FIDELITY CHARITABLE FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2018 · $750k
  • NC
    NICHOLS COLLEGE
    one grant, 2017 · $100k · revenue +8%
  • HF
    HEADSTRONG FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $5k · revenue +93%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Trinity University

Trinity university is an independent co-educational university whose mission is excellence in the interrelated areas of teaching, research and services.

Education
2
President and Fellows of Harvard College

Undergraduate, graduate, and professional education and research across a broad array of academic domains.

Education
3
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
4
Dean College

Dean college is a private, residential new england college grounded in a culture and tradition that all students deserve the opportunity to discover and exceed their greatest aspirations. a personal and transformative community since 1865,…

Education
5
Northeast College of Health Sciences

Northeast college of health sciences (the college) is committed to academic excellence, leadership, and professional best practices in the health sciences.

Education
6
Reed Institute

The mission of Reed College is to provide education in the liberal arts and sciences.

Education
7
New England Lawboston

New england law/boston dedicates itself to preparing students to be successful lawyers and leaders in the public and private sectors through integrated practical, theoretical and ethical education of the highest caliber and to contributing…

Education
8
Wingate University

The mission of wingate university is to develop educated, ethical, and productive global citizens. following its judeo-christian heritage, the university seeks to cultivate the following in its students: knowledge, faith, and service.

Education
9
Wentworth Institute of Technology Inc

Wentworth institute of technology is a nationally recognized private coeducational and residential university of higher education with a mission to empower, inspire and innovate through experiential learning with a core purpose of career…

Education
10
Emmanuel College

Emmanuel college is a coed, residential catholic liberal arts and sciences college with 2,112 undergraduate and graduate students.

Education
11
Northeastern Seminary

Northeastern seminary strives to be a vibrant source for christian theological formation whose students are formed in a biblical vision of gracious christianity and impact wholeness to the world in an expansive array of vocations and…

Education
12
Eckerd College

The mission of eckerd college is to provide excellent innovative undergraduate liberal arts education and lifelong learning programs in the unique florida environment, within the context of a covenant relationship with the presbyterian…

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Wounded Warrior Project Inc and the most unlike its peers is No Dog Left Behind. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 34 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/16
Grantees still filing
13/16
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

FIDELITY CHARITABLE FOUNDATION — $750,000 · OtherFIDELITY CHARITABLE FOUNDATIONIndividual grant recipient — $28,000 · Other+16 more — $59,450 · Other+16 moreNICHOLS COLLEGE — $100,000 · EducationNICHOLS COLLEGETHE ADMINISTRATORS OF THE TULANE EDUCATIONAL FUND — $40,000 · EducationTHE ADMINISTRATO…+4 more — $8,500 · Education+4 moreRedbird Ministries — $23,000 · Human Services+1 more — $500 · Human ServicesHEADSTRONG FOUNDATION — $5,000 · HealthRED BIRD MINISTRIES INC — $5,000 · HealthBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC — $2,000 · HealthRED SNEAKERS FOR OAKLEY INC — $1,500 · HealthNEW ENGLAND BAPTIST HOSPITAL — $500 · HealthNo Dog Left Behind — $1,500 · AnimalsJACKSON HOLE KAYAK CLUB INC — $1,000 · Recreation & SportsTHE SURFRIDER FOUNDATION — $750 · Environment
Other$837,450Education$148,500Human Services$23,500Health$14,000Animals$1,500Recreation & Sports$1,000Environment$750

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetNICHOLS COLLEGE — $100,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE ADMINISTRATORS OF THE TULANE EDUCATIONAL FUND — $40,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetRedbird Ministries — $23,000 over 2y, 6.4% of budgetHEADSTRONG FOUNDATION — $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetRED BIRD MINISTRIES INC — $5,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetST GEORGE'S SCHOOL — $4,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTRINITY COLLEGE — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRED SNEAKERS FOR OAKLEY INC — $1,500 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetNo Dog Left Behind — $1,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetJACKSON HOLE KAYAK CLUB INC — $1,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetCATE SCHOOL — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLANDON SCHOOL — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SURFRIDER FOUNDATION — $750 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEW ENGLAND BAPTIST HOSPITAL — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds NICHOLS COLLEGE
  • Who funds THE ADMINISTRATORS OF THE TULANE EDUCATIONAL FUND
  • Who funds Redbird Ministries
  • Who funds HEADSTRONG FOUNDATION
  • Who funds RED BIRD MINISTRIES INC
  • Who funds ST GEORGE'S SCHOOL
  • Who funds TRINITY COLLEGE
  • Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC
  • Who funds RED SNEAKERS FOR OAKLEY INC
  • Who funds No Dog Left Behind
  • Who funds JACKSON HOLE KAYAK CLUB INC
  • Who funds CATE SCHOOL
  • Who funds LANDON SCHOOL
  • Who funds THE SURFRIDER FOUNDATION
  • Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC
  • Who funds NEW ENGLAND BAPTIST HOSPITAL

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust IncIN11.6× affinity7 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Endowment Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Patel Family Private Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 30%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 0%
  • New England Baptist Hospital1% of income from government
  • Nichols College0% of income from government
  • Trinity College0% of income from government
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Patel Family Private Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Patel Family Private Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 34 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph