Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Paschal Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$64k
Granted FY2025still arriving
11
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$12k
Largest
01What you fund
0195% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Religion$150kRecreation & Sports$119kHealth$70kPhilanthropy$40kFood & Nutrition$17kEducation$16kYouth Development$3kHousing & Shelter$2kOther$0
02FY2025 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k10 grants · $52k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $12k
$5,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$415k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Rick Hughes Evangelistic Ministries$12,000
Individual grant recipient$9,000
Misc Charitable organizations$7,700
First Presbyterian Church$7,500
Friends of Childrens Hospital$6,000
St Dominics Health Foundation$5,000
Mustard Seed$4,000
Urban Gleaners$4,000
Berachah Church$3,000
RB Thieme Bible Ministries$3,000
Miss State Univ Foundation$3,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY22–22, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 14%Shower Power: $2k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WA
OR
CO
LA
MS
AL
GA
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$387k · 13 repeat orgs$48k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +50% since the first grant, against +7% for the ones you funded once.

13 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
10

Total granted

$387k
$35k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+50%
+7%

Still filing today

46%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 79% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $14k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
ReligionEducationHousing & ShelterHealthFood & NutritionYouth DevelopmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RH
    RICK HUGHES EVANGELISTIC MINISTRIES
    8× · 2018–2025 · $81k · revenue +120%
  • JF
    JACKSON FREE CLINIC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $29k · revenue +50%
  • TM
    The Mustard Seed Inc
    3× · 2023–2025 · $9k · revenue +10%

Funded once

  • MS
    MISSISSIPPI STATE UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2017 · $11k
  • ET
    Extra Table - Feeding Neighbors
    one grant, 2020 · $5k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $5k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Justin Peters Ministries

Preaching Christian evangelism by conducting revivals, speaking at conferences, teaching Bible and doctrinal seminars and providing pulpit supply to bring about a greater understanding of theology for attendees.

Religion
2
Reformed University Inc

Provide education in theology, divinity, religious education, ministerial training, business and organizational leadership.

Education
3
Mission Mississippi

To encourage and demonstrate grace in the body of christ across racial lines, so that communities throughout mississippi can see practical evidence of the gospel message.

Civil Rights
4
Redeemer City Church Inc

Church ministry

Religion
5
Donaldson Christian Counseling Inc

We provide biblically based, Jesus Christ Centered counseling as a religious teaching organization. Services provided to over 400 people and local christian churches.

Religion
6
Torch of Christ Ministries

Torch of Christ Ministries provides evangelism, education, and missional support through the dissemination of information with the primary intent of preaching the gospel of Jesus Christ to all.

Religion
7
Faith Mountain Ministries

Church

8
Joe Mcgee Ministries Inc

To preach the Gospel of Jesus Christ

Religion
9
But God Ministries

Sharing the love of jesus christ by building sustainable communities around the world and providing medical care to low-income households in the united states. the organization is currently building two sustainable communities in haiti and…

International
10
Bill Johnson Ministries

Organization is a christian ministry

Religion
11
Walk Thru the Bible Ministries Inc

Walk thru the bible (wtb) ignites passion for god's word. by developing a global network of influential pastors and leaders and then resourcing them with tools and training, wtb fulfills its role in the great commission.

Religion
12
Tri-Cities Center for Christian Counseling

Tri-Cities Center for Christian Counseling strives to be a grace in truth counseling ministry committed to providing help, hope and healing to hurting people with the love of christ through competent and compassionate soul care.

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Young Life and the most unlike its peers is Urban Gleaners. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 26 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
9/11
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

The MSU Bulldog ClubInc — $114,270 · OtherThe MSU Bulldog ClubIncBERACHAH CHURCH — $44,000 · OtherBERACHAH CHURCHMisc Charitable organizations — $40,331 · OtherMisc Charitable organizationsSt Dominics Health Foundation — $23,000 · OtherSt Dominics Health FoundationIndividual grant recipient — $14,000 · OtherMISSISSIPPI STATE UNIVERSITY — $10,640 · Other+11 more — $48,500 · Other+11 moreRICK HUGHES EVANGELISTIC MINISTRIES — $81,000 · ReligionRICK HUGHES EVANGELIS…+1 more — $1,000 · ReligionJACKSON FREE CLINIC — $29,000 · Housing & ShelterURBAN GLEANERS — $12,000 · Food & NutritionFRIENDS OF CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL INC — $8,500 · HealthBLUE MOUNTAIN CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY — $2,000 · EducationREFORMED THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY — $2,000 · EducationYOUNG LIFE — $3,000 · Youth DevelopmentSHOWER POWER INC — $2,000 · Human Services
Other$294,741Religion$82,000Housing & Shelter$29,000Food & Nutrition$12,000Health$8,500Education$4,000Youth Development$3,000Human Services$2,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetRICK HUGHES EVANGELISTIC MINISTRIES — $81,000 over 8y, 2.4% of budgetJACKSON FREE CLINIC — $29,000 over 5y, 9.0% of budgetURBAN GLEANERS — $12,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetThe Mustard Seed Inc — $9,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetFRIENDS OF CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL INC — $8,500 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetYOUNG LIFE — $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSHOWER POWER INC — $2,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetBLUE MOUNTAIN CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY — $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetREFORMED THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds RICK HUGHES EVANGELISTIC MINISTRIES
  • Who funds JACKSON FREE CLINIC
  • Who funds URBAN GLEANERS
  • Who funds The Mustard Seed Inc
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL INC
  • Who funds YOUNG LIFE
  • Who funds R B Thieme Jr Bible Ministries
  • Who funds SHOWER POWER INC
  • Who funds BLUE MOUNTAIN CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds REFORMED THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY
  • Who funds LIGHT OF THE WORLD PRAYER CENTER

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Ergon Foundation IncMS15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Ergon Foundation Inc · Community Foundation for Mississippi · Van Devender Family Foundation William Van Devender Trustee · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · American Endowment Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Paschal Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 26 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph