Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Parrish Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$86k
Granted FY2025still arriving
26
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Recreation & Sports$243kEducation$141kHealth$80kReligion$27kHuman Services$16kFood & Nutrition$8kYouth Development$7kPhilanthropy$2kOther$0
02FY2025 · 26 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k24 grants · $41k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $45k
$1,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$1.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SAN ANTONIO LIVESTOCK EXPOSITION INC$25,200
THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT SAN ANTONIO$20,000
SAN ANTONIO A & M CLUB FOUNDATION$5,000
HOPE HITS HARDER$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
Individual grant recipient$2,500
Individual grant recipient$2,500
Individual grant recipient$2,500
Individual grant recipient$2,500
Individual grant recipient$2,500
Individual grant recipient$2,500
Individual grant recipient$1,500
YOUNG LIFE$1,000
SAN ANTONIO ROSAS AMARILLAS INC$1,000
EAGLES AUTISM CHALLENGE INC$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $15k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 83% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%TAKING IT TO THE STREETS: $500 → 7%THE WILLPOWER COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $1k → 10%SAFE ALLIANCE INC: $5k → 10%CHOSEN CARE INC: $500 → 10%CHOSEN CARE INC: $500 → 10%CHILDSAFE: $5k → 16%GRIDIRON HEROES SPINAL CORD INJURY FOUNDATION: $3k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
IA
PA
CT
CO
MO
VA
TN
NC
GA
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 8% of The Parrish Family Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 97% of the giving stays in TX; by stated purpose, 95%.

The Parrish Family Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 2.1% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

71%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$378k · 22 repeat orgs$152k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +37% since the first grant, against +0% for those funded once.

22 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2025, 11 since wound down; 15 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

22
56

Total granted

$378k
$110k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+37%
+0%

Still filing today

55%
41%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 51% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $42k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesEducationYouth DevelopmentRecreation & SportsPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SA
    SAN ANTONIO LIVESTOCK EXPOSITION INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $159k · revenue +33%
  • HH
    HOPE HITS HARDER
    7× · 2018–2025 · $64k · revenue +117%
  • TA
    Texas A&M University 12th Man Foundation
    3× · 2019–2024 · $60k · revenue +70%

Funded once

  • CL
    CONCORDIA LUTHERAN CHURCH
    one grant, 2022 · $25k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $12k
  • C
    CHILDSAFEgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $5k · revenue +497%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Young Texans Against Cancer Dallas

Young Texans Against Cancer is a network of motivated young professionals collectively working together to raise awareness and funds to support the local Dallas cancer community. The Dallas chapter was established in 2007, as part of a…

—
2
San Antonio Foster Care and Adoption and Services

San antonio foster care and adoption services inc. is a licensed child placement agency in the state of texas. the organization cares for children placed in foster care by the state of texas.

Human Services
3
Any Baby Can of San Antonio Inc

The mission of any baby can is to serve families of children and youth facing serious health or developmental challenges. barriers of income and location are addressed by providing all services at no cost to the families and at a location…

Human Services
4
San Antonio Automobile Dealers Association Foundation Inc
—
5
Child Advocates San Antonio

To recruit, develop, and lead court-appointed volunteer advocates who provide constancy for abused and neglected children and youth while advocating for services and placement in safe and permanent homes.

Civil Rights
6
Young Texans Against Cancer

Young texans against cancer (ytac) is an independent, nonprofit organization comprised of men and women who have been affected by cancer or are seeking to become more actively involved in the cancer community. our organization is focused…

—
7
Sa Cancer Council

The mission of the sa cancer council is to provide financial resources for patient assistance services and cancer research to support the mays cancer center, home to ut health san antonio md anderson.

—
8
Foster Angels of South Texas Foundation

The foundation's sole purpose is to enrich the lives of children in foster care in south texas.

Human Services
9
Children's Cancer Fund of Dallas inc

Children's cancer fund champions kids in their fight against cancer through strategic investments in research and care in north texas.

Health
10
Children's Alliance of South Texas

To provide a neutral, child friendly organization that facilitates a multi-disciplinary approach to the investigation, intervention and treatment of child abuse.

Crime & Legal
11
Texas Cowboys Against Cancer

Fundraising to support cancer patients in the cowboy community

Health
12
Battle for a Cure Foundation

To enrich the lives of children fighting cancer by offering various outreach programs to them and their families and by funding the most promising research specifically targeted toward childhood cancers, battle for a cure wants to give…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Chosen Care Inc; the most unlike its peers is Pieper Warriors Youth Football Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

43 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 43 of the 93 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
43/43
Grantees still filing
27/43
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CONCORDIA LUTHERAN CHURCH: $25,000 · OtherCONCORDIA LUTHERAN CHURCHTHE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT SAN ANTONIO: $20,000 · OtherTHE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT SAN ANTONIOIndividual grant recipient: $12,491 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $10,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $10,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $7,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $7,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $7,500 · Other+50 more: $88,250 · Other+50 moreSAN ANTONIO LIVESTOCK EXPOSITION INC: $159,185 · Recreation & SportsSAN ANTONIO LIVESTOCK EXPOSITION I…+2 more: $2,000 · Recreation & SportsTexas A&M University 12th Man Foundation: $59,600 · EducationTexas A&M Univers…AGORA MINISTRIES INC: $15,250 · EducationAGORA MINISTRIES …SAN ANTONIO A & M CLUB FOUNDATION: $5,000 · EducationSAN ANTONIO A & M…+1 more: $500 · EducationHOPE HITS HARDER: $64,000 · HealthHOPE HITS HARDE…+12 more: $10,500 · Health+12 moreCHILDSAFE: $5,000 · Human ServicesSafe Alliance Inc: $5,000 · Human ServicesGridiron Heroes Spinal Cord Injury Foundation: $2,500 · Human ServicesWILLPOWER COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $1,000 · Human ServicesCHOSEN CARE INC: $1,000 · Human Services+3 more: $1,500 · Human ServicesSan Antonio Rosas Amarillas Inc CO Traci Brodbeck: $3,000 · Youth DevelopmentYOUNG LIFE: $2,000 · Youth DevelopmentFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES: $1,000 · Youth DevelopmentGUARDIANS OF THE CHILDREN: $500 · Youth DevelopmentCHILDREN'S ALOPECIA PROJECT: $1,000 · PhilanthropySMITHSON VALLEY HIGH SCHOOL BAND BOOSTER CLUB: $1,000 · PhilanthropyGeorgetown Beard Club Inc: $1,000 · Philanthropy
Other$188,241Recreation & Sports$161,185Education$80,350Health$74,500Human Services$16,000Youth Development$6,500Philanthropy$3,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSAN ANTONIO LIVESTOCK EXPOSITION INC: $159,185 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetHOPE HITS HARDER: $64,000 over 7y, 7.7% of budgetTexas A&M University 12th Man Foundation: $59,600 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAGORA MINISTRIES INC: $15,250 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetCHILDSAFE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSAN ANTONIO FOOD BANK: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSafe Alliance Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSan Antonio Rosas Amarillas Inc CO Traci Brodbeck: $3,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetGridiron Heroes Spinal Cord Injury Foundation: $2,500 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetYOUNG LIFE: $2,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF LOS NINOS: $2,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetRound Rock Area Serving Center Inc: $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPieper Warriors Youth Football Association: $1,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetAMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR SUICIDE PREVENTION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetChicktime Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetTHE SAFE ALLIANCE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWILLPOWER COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S ALOPECIA PROJECT: $1,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetJulie Rogers Gift of Life Program: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetEAGLES AUTISM CHALLENGE INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSMITHSON VALLEY HIGH SCHOOL BAND BOOSTER CLUB: $1,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetDOWN SYNDROME ASSOCIATION OF SOUTH TEXAS: $1,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCHOSEN CARE INC: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTAKING IT TO THE STREETS: $500 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetGUARDIANS OF THE CHILDREN: $500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetThe Family Diabetes Resource Center of Texas: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHOICE LIVING COMMUNITY: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNAMI National: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMOBILE LOAVES & FISHES INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFOSTER ANGELS OF CENTRAL TEXAS FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKIDZ1STFUND INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetORENDA EDUCATION: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SAN ANTONIO LIVESTOCK EXPOSITION INC ↗
  • Who funds HOPE HITS HARDER ↗
  • Who funds Texas A&M University 12th Man Foundation ↗
  • Who funds AGORA MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds CHILDSAFE ↗
  • Who funds SAN ANTONIO FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds SAN ANTONIO A & M CLUB FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Safe Alliance Inc ↗
  • Who funds San Antonio Rosas Amarillas Inc CO Traci Brodbeck ↗
  • Who funds Gridiron Heroes Spinal Cord Injury Foundation ↗
  • Who funds YOUNG LIFE ↗
  • Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF LOS NINOS ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

San Antonio Area FoundationTX22.7× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: San Antonio Area Foundation · Faye L & William L Cowden Charitable Foundation · Harvey E Najim Charitable Foundation · Nustar Foundation · Carl C Anderson Sr and Marie Jo Anderson Charitable Foundation · The Dixie Starnes Wenger Foundation · John L Santikos Charitable Foundation · United Way Worldwide · Greater Houston Community Foundation · The Ayco Charitable Foundation · Texas Instruments Foundation · Enterprise Holdings Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Parrish Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Parrish Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Parrish Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Parrish Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 93 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Parrish Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph