Skip to content
The Panjandrum Foundation Co C&S Wholes at a glance

· Private foundation

The Panjandrum Foundation Co C&S Wholes

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$384k
Granted FY2025still arriving
2
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$300k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$4.5MEducation$4.3MHealth$2.1MInternational$1.3MCrime & Legal$300kEnvironment$291kHuman Services$210kPhilanthropy$195kOther$0
02FY2025 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $50k–250k1 grant · $84k
  • $250k+1 grant · $300k
$300,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$1.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GLBTQ LEGAL ADVOCATES & DEFENDERS$300,000
MONADNOCK AFFORDABLE HOUSING CORP$84,432
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–20, $160k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 14%SOPHIA'S HEARTH FAMILY CENTER: $100k → 9%KEENE FAMILY YMCA: $30k → 9%KEENE FAMILY YMCA: $30k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$12M · 15 repeat orgs$960k to everyone else

15 repeat relationships: 0 still active in FY2025, 15 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
13

Total granted

$12M
$576k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+73%
+111%

Still filing today

60%
31%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $384k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureHuman ServicesFood & NutritionInternationalHealthCivil RightsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AI
    AUSCHWITZ INSTITUTE FOR THE PREVENTION OF GENOCIDE AND MASS ATROCITIES
    5× · 2017–2021 · $1.3M · revenue +173% · 25% of their budget
  • FC
    FENWAY COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER INC
    4× · 2018–2021 · $696k · revenue +7%
  • CONSERVATION LAW FOUNDATION INC
    5× · 2019–2023 · $250k · revenue +122%

Funded once

  • UW
    UNITED WAY
    one grant, 2020 · $175k
  • CM
    CHESHIRE MEDICAL CENTER
    one grant, 2019 · $100k
  • SH
    SOPHIA'S HEARTH FAMILY CENTER
    one grant, 2017 · $100k · revenue -3%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
2
The Trustees of Mount Holyoke College

Located in south hadley, massachusetts, mount holyoke college is a highly selective, nondenominational, residential, research liberal arts college for women that is gender-diverse and welcomes applications from female, transgender, and…

Education
3
Bard College

Bard college seeks to provide a challenging academic program and a supportive environment that fosters a collaborative interchange of ideas in the classroom as well as ambition to achieve excellence.

Education
4
Company One Inc

Company one theatre builds community at the intersection of art and social change. vision: a boston defined by justice, equity, and artistic innovation. manifesto: welcome to our community, where every audience member, artist, student, and…

Arts & Culture
5
Western New England University

Western new england university, a comprehensive private institution with a tradition of excellence in teaching and scholarship and a commitment to service, awards undergraduate, master's, and doctoral degrees in various departments from…

Education
6
Actors Company of Natick

The Actors Company of Natick ACON creates theatre with purpose. At ACON, we celebrate artists and challenge community perspectives through equitable, professional and accessible productions.

Arts & Culture
7
Worcester Center for Performing Arts Inc

Worcester center for performing arts promotes and/or hosts more than 250 performances and welcomes more than 150,000 attendees each year. the hanover theatre conservatory reaches more than 700 students in theatre, technical theatre and…

Arts & Culture
8
The Adams Theater Presents Inc

Create a sustainable performing arts institution that fosters community engagement through a diverse range of programming

Arts & Culture
9
The Park Theatre Inc

The park theatre strives to provide diverse artistic, cultural, and community-focused experiences designed to entertain, educate and inspire.

Arts & Culture
10
Fitchburg Art Museum

The mission of the fitchburg art museum is to inspire creativity and learning, and to contribute to the well-being of our diverse communities in fitchburg, north central massachusetts, and new england. to accomplish the mission, we…

Arts & Culture
11
Dickinson College

Dickinson college provides a useful, innovative and interdisciplinary education in the liberal arts and sciences to prepare students to lead rich and fulfilling lives of engaged global citizenship

Education
12
Wamc

Wamc is chartered by the new york state board of regents to "furnish, prepare and present non-profit and non-commercial educational, instructional and cultural radio programs and also non-profit and non-commercial programs (wamc's mission…

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Sophia's Hearth Family Center; the most unlike its peers is Auschwitz Institute for the Prevention of Genocide and Mass Atrocities. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 31 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/16
Grantees still filing
13/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

KEENE STATE COLLEGE: $3,000,000 · OtherKEENE STATE COLLEGEHARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL: $1,500,000 · OtherHARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOLKEENE PUBLIC LIBRARY: $650,000 · OtherKEENE PUBLIC LIBRARYCOOLEY DICKERSON HOSPITAL: $300,000 · Other+16 more: $750,323 · Other+16 moreTHE COLONIAL THEATRE: $3,150,000 · Arts & CultureTHE COLONIAL THEATRETHE MOVING COMPANY DANCE CENTER: $1,100,000 · Arts & CultureTHE MOVING COMPANY DANCE CENTERAPPLE HILL CENTER FOR CHAMBER MUSIC INC: $150,000 · Arts & Culture+3 more: $47,500 · Arts & CultureAUSCHWITZ INSTITUTE FOR THE PREVENTION OF GENOCIDE AND MASS ATROCITIES: $1,253,000 · InternationalAUSCHWITZ …FENWAY COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER INC: $695,847 · HealthGLBTQ LEGAL ADVOCATES & DEFENDERS INC: $300,000 · Civil RightsCONSERVATION LAW FOUNDATION INC: $250,000 · EnvironmentTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $170,000 · Education
Other$6,200,323Arts & Culture$4,447,500International$1,253,000Health$695,847Civil Rights$300,000Environment$250,000Education$170,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE COLONIAL THEATRE: $3,150,000 over 4y, 29% of budgetAUSCHWITZ INSTITUTE FOR THE PREVENTION OF GENOCIDE AND MASS ATROCITIES: $1,253,000 over 5y, 25% of budgetTHE MOVING COMPANY DANCE CENTER: $1,100,000 over 3y, 25% of budgetFENWAY COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER INC: $695,847 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetGLBTQ LEGAL ADVOCATES & DEFENDERS INC: $300,000 over 1y, 2.8% of budgetCONSERVATION LAW FOUNDATION INC: $250,000 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $170,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAPPLE HILL CENTER FOR CHAMBER MUSIC INC: $150,000 over 3y, 5.3% of budgetSOPHIA'S HEARTH FAMILY CENTER: $100,000 over 1y, 14% of budgetKEENE YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION: $60,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetASHUELOT CONCERTS: $27,500 over 2y, 7.4% of budgetCAPITOL HILL ARTS WORKSHOP: $25,000 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetBRATTLEBORO MUSEUM & ART CENTERINC: $10,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetARTS ALIVE INC: $10,000 over 1y, 2.9% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE COLONIAL THEATRE ↗
  • Who funds AUSCHWITZ INSTITUTE FOR THE PREVENTION OF GENOCIDE AND MASS ATROCITIES ↗
  • Who funds THE MOVING COMPANY DANCE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds FENWAY COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds GLBTQ LEGAL ADVOCATES & DEFENDERS INC ↗
  • Who funds CONSERVATION LAW FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA ↗
  • Who funds APPLE HILL CENTER FOR CHAMBER MUSIC INC ↗
  • Who funds SOPHIA'S HEARTH FAMILY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds MONADNOCK AFFORDABLE HOUSING CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds KEENE YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds ASHUELOT CONCERTS ↗
  • Who funds CAPITOL HILL ARTS WORKSHOP ↗
  • Who funds END 68 HOURS OF HUNGER ↗
  • Who funds BRATTLEBORO MUSEUM & ART CENTERINC ↗
  • Who funds ARTS ALIVE INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

New Hampshire Charita…The Kingsbury FundHoffman Family Founda…The Eppes - Jefferson…Eversource Energy Fou…Gs Donor Advised Phil…Morgan Stanley Global…Vanguard Charitable E…Fidelity Investments …American Online Givin…Donor Advised Charita…Amazonsmile Foundation
New Hampshire Charitable FoundationNH23.2× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: New Hampshire Charitable Foundation · The Kingsbury Fund · Hoffman Family Foundation · The Eppes - Jefferson Foundation Inc · Eversource Energy Foundation Inc · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Panjandrum Foundation Co C&S Wholes funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Panjandrum Foundation Co C&S Wholes. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%2%8%17%30%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • Fenway Community Health Center Inc: 27% of income from government
  • Brattleboro Museum & Art Centerinc: 1% of income from government
  • Glbtq Legal Advocates & Defenders Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Panjandrum Foundation Co C&S Wholes?

Find your warmest path to The Panjandrum Foundation Co C&S Wholes through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 31 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Panjandrum Foundation Co C&S Wholes’ filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home