· Private foundation
The Lester Napier Foundation Inc
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k6 grants · $42k
- $10k–50k8 grants · $125k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN | $25,000 |
| PREBLE STREET | $25,000 |
| SECOND SERVINGS HOUSTON | $15,000 |
| TARGET HUNGER | $15,000 |
| MIDCOAST MAINE COMMUNITY ACTION | $15,000 |
| BATH AREA FOOD BANK | $10,000 |
| BIG SUNDAY | $10,000 |
| UNDIES FOR EVERYONE | $10,000 |
| LITERACY COALITION OF PALM BEACH | $7,000 |
| YWCA OF PALM BEACH COUNTY | $7,000 |
| CENTER FOR CHILD COUNSELING | $7,000 |
| VITA NOVA | $7,000 |
| HOME SAFE | $7,000 |
| FAMILY PROMISE OF YELLOWSTONE VALLEY | $7,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $522k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 37% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +68% since the first grant, against +9% for the ones you funded once.
37 repeat relationships — 12 still active in FY2024, 25 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $14k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- PSPREBLE STREET7× · 2017–2024 · $185k · revenue +182%
- MMMIDCOAST MAINE COMMUNITY ACTION6× · 2019–2024 · $115k · revenue +58%
RHODE ISLAND COMMUNITY FOOD BANK ASSOCIATION3× · 2017–2020 · $110k · revenue +106%
Funded once
- PLPARA LOS NINOSgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $30k · revenue +64%
- AHANNUNCIATION HOUSE INCone grant, 2019 · $25k
- OLOFICINA LEGAL DEL PUEBLO UNIDO INCgraduatedone grant, 2019 · $25k · revenue +45%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To ensure that everyone in Palm Beach County has access to the basics: A quality education, a place to live, financial stability, good medical care, and enough to eat.
The Palm Beach County Food Bank is dedicated to fighting hunger and improving food security in Palm Beach County by providing food, nutrition education and financial assistance services.
United Food Bank unites communities to alleviate hunger.
Project Open Hand's mission is to improve health outcomes and quality of life by providing nutritious meals to the sick and vulnerable, caring for and educating our community.
To create communities of health through fresh food. Brighter Bites seeks to improve health outcomes among children and families in under-resourced communities by using data-driven, evidence-based strategies for providing fresh produce and…
To provide food to all in need through community partnerships and hunger relief programs. Our vision is a hunger-free Larimer County.
On a mission to connect every person facing hunger with nutritious meals by maximizing food rescue. through direct service and community partnerships, feeding san diego provides more than 26 million meals each year to children, families,…
Feeding south florida's mission is to end hunger in south florida by providing immediate access to nutritious food, leading hunger and poverty advocacy efforts, and transforming lives through innovative programming and education.
Nourishing our community. the port angeles food bank is the main food bank in clallam county, providing food to 13 other area pantries and meal programs as well as providing food to over 5,000 individuals per month.
Family Promise North Central Palm Beach County is responding to the ongoing crisis of family homelessness in Palm Beach County, Florida by uniting with our community partners to help local homeless children by empowering their families to…
Meals on wheels of the palm beaches mission is to nourish and enrich the lives of homebound seniors by delivering fresh food daily with compassion and love.
Hunger action los angeles ends hunger and promotes healthy eating through advocacy, education, and appropriate direct service. the chief program area currently is the market match prgram operated by hala at 22 farmers markets in la county…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Children's Institute Inc and the most unlike its peers is Bath Area Back Pack Program. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 29 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
53 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 53 of the 65 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds PREBLE STREET ↗
- Who funds MIDCOAST MAINE COMMUNITY ACTION ↗
- Who funds RHODE ISLAND COMMUNITY FOOD BANK ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds Big Sunday ↗
- Who funds Art Division ↗
- Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
- Who funds BATH AREA FOOD BANK ↗
- Who funds Target Hunger Inc ↗
- Who funds Providence CityArts for Youth Inc ↗
- Who funds Undies for Everyone ↗
- Who funds New Urban Arts ↗
- Who funds OASIS HEALTH NETWORK INC ↗
- Who funds LOS ANGELES REGIONAL FOOD BANK ↗
- Who funds SECOND SERVINGS OF HOUSTON ↗
- Who funds PARA LOS NINOS ↗
- Who funds Mid Coast Hunger Prevention Program ↗
- Who funds NOVA UKRAINE ↗
- Who funds OFICINA LEGAL DEL PUEBLO UNIDO INC ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF PBC ↗
- Who funds ALZHEIMER'S COMMUNITY CARE INC ↗
- Who funds Adopt-A-Family of the Palm Beaches Inc ↗
- Who funds THE ARC OF PALM BEACH COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds CANCER ALLIANCE OF HELP AND HOPE INC ↗
- Who funds FAMILY PROMISE OF YELLOWSTONE VALLEY ↗
- Who funds Caridad Center Inc ↗
- Who funds WISE READERS TO LEADERS ↗
- Who funds INTERNATIONAL FUND FOR ANIMAL WELFARE INC ↗
- Who funds Lucilles 1913 Community Kitchen ↗
- Who funds THE CHANGE REACTION ↗
- Who funds Christians Reaching Out To Society Inc ↗
- Who funds Urban Youth Impact Inc ↗
- Who funds THE GLADES INITIATIVE INC ↗
- Who funds CLINICS CAN HELP INC ↗
- Who funds YWCA OF PALM BEACH COUNTY ↗
- Who funds MILAGRO FOUNDATION INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Mary Alice Fortin Foundation · Lost Tree Village Charitable Foundation · Community Foundation for Palm Beach and Martin Counties Inc · Leslie L Alexander Foundation Inc · The Chamber of Nonprofit Health and Human Agencies in Palm Beach County Inc · The Jim Moran Foundation Inc · The Batchelor Foundation Inc · Town of Palm Beach United Way Inc · Quantum Foundation Inc · United Way of Palm Beach County Inc · The Palm Beach Post Season to Share Inc · The Mirasol Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Lester Napier Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Ywca of Palm Beach County — 72% of income from government
- Vita Nova Inc — 42% of income from government
- Adopt-a-Family of the Palm Beaches Inc — 15% of income from government
- The Lord's Place Inc — 12% of income from government
- Center for Child Counseling Inc — 8% of income from government
- Caridad Center Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to The Lester Napier Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to The Lester Napier Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.