Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Ott Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$64k
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$28k
Largest
01What it funds
0192% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

International$1.0MEducation$543kReligion$263kPhilanthropy$261kFood & Nutrition$90kHousing & Shelter$86kHuman Services$79kYouth Development$63kOther$0
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k11 grants · $26k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $38k
$2,144
Median grant
2
States reached
$98k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE CARING FOUNDATION INC$28,024
Individual grant recipient$10,000
HOPE RESTORED FOCUS ON THE FAMILY$6,002
HANDS OF HOPE$5,000
GLOBAL PARTNERS$3,000
CAREY SERVICES$2,500
FLAT LAND RESOURCES LLC$2,144
Individual grant recipient$2,000
HOPE INDIA MISSION$2,000
COMPASSION INTERNATIONAL$1,032
Individual grant recipient$1,000
GILEAD MINISTRIES$1,000
SPECIAL OLYMPICS$175
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $30k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 75% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%AWAKENING HOPE: $5k → 8%AWAKENING HOPE: $3k → 8%CAREY SERVICES: $5k → 19%CAREY SERVICES: $3k → 19%CAREY SERVICES: $3k → 19%CAREY SERVICES: $3k → 19%CAREY SERVICES: $3k → 19%CAREY SERVICES: $3k → 19%CAREY SERVICES: $3k → 19%CAREY SERVICES: $3k → 19%LIVING WATER APOSTOLIC CHURCH: $300 → 19%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
IL
MI
NY
IN
NJ
CA
CO
MO
VA
NM
NC
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 25% of The Ott Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 44% of the giving stays in IN; by stated purpose, 23%.

The Ott Foundation Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 5.3% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.4M · 33 repeat orgs$234k to everyone else

33 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2025, 24 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

33
40

Total granted

$2.4M
$215k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+28%
+45%

Still filing today

42%
13%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 70% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $19k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
InternationalReligionHuman ServicesEducationFood & NutritionYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WH
    World Hope International Inc
    4× · 2017–2020 · $554k · revenue +4%
  • IW
    INDIANA WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY
    3× · 2017–2019 · $540k · revenue +22%
  • TC
    THE CARING FOUNDATION INCORPORATED
    8× · 2018–2025 · $244k · revenue +28% · 53% of their budget

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2024 · $79k
  • TC
    THE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2017 · $17k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $14k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Child Hope International

We minister to orphans and widows in their distress by transitioning children from orphanages into loving families. We do this through Christ- centered care, training and social work.

Arts & Culture
2
Christianity Today International

Christianity Today is a global community inspired by evangelical conviction to advance the stories and ideas of the kingdom of God. Our mission is to elevate the storytellers and sages of the global church.

Religion
3
International Leadership Institute

The international leadership institute (ili) changes history by accelerating the spread of the gospel through training and mobilizing leaders of leaders to reach their nations. ili accomplishes this purpose through cutting edge leadership…

Religion
4
Youth for Christ International Ministries

As part of the body of Christ, to see that every young person in every people group in every nation has the opportunity to make an informed decision to be a follower of Jesus Christ and become a part of the local church.

Religion
5
Sozo International Inc

Sozo International partners with at-risk families to create a sustainable future and transformed lives through education, health, and economic initiatives.

—
6
Biglife International Inc

Biglife international inc. empowers believers worldwide to reach and disciple their own people for jesus christ.

Recreation & Sports
7
Freedom in Christ Ministries

To provide resources, training, and continuing support to leaders in the us and around the world in order that they may help others find freedom in christ.

Religion
8
India Transformed

Delivering hope through faith by transforming lives spiritually, socially and economically.

Education
9
Churches in Missions Inc

Mobilization of churches in America by taking pastors and laymen on vision and service trips overseas in fulfillment of Jesus command to go ye into all the world, making disciples...

Human Services
10
Servenow

Sharing Christ's Passion for the world by serving the most vulnerable through national churches and leaders.

Human Services
11
Next Worldwide Inc

With a desire to see the Gospel proclaimed in all nations, we exist to make and multiply disciples of the next generation through the vehicles of church-planting missions and missional leadership training.

—
12
Christar International Inc

Christar international serves as a catalyst to the network of christar ministries by facilitating and encouraging partnerships with churches who sen dout men and women who proclaim the gospel for life-giving transformation in communitiesw…

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Lifesong for Orphans Inc; the most unlike its peers is Marion Civic Theatre Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 77 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/22
Grantees still filing
17/22
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

World Hope International Inc: $553,914 · InternationalWorld Hope International IncLIFESONG FOR ORPHANS INC: $227,631 · InternationalLIFESONG FOR ORPHANS INC+2 more: $15,808 · InternationalFORGE: $216,229 · OtherFORGEIndividual grant recipient: $79,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientHANDS OF HOPE: $50,000 · OtherHANDS OF HOPEHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF GRANT COUNTY INC: $40,000 · OtherFAMILY SERVICE SOCIETY INC: $40,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $35,000 · Other+60 more: $320,087 · Other+60 moreINDIANA WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY: $540,000 · EducationINDIANA WESLEYAN UNIVER…THE CARING FOUNDATION INCORPORATED: $243,590 · PhilanthropyTHE CARING…EQUIP Leadership Inc: $75,000 · ReligionHope India Mission Inc: $16,000 · ReligionGILEAD MINISTRIES INC: $8,000 · ReligionMETRO RELIEF: $90,000 · Food & NutritionGRIP OUTREACH FOR YOUTH: $60,000 · Youth Development
International$797,353Other$780,316Education$540,000Philanthropy$243,590Religion$99,000Food & Nutrition$90,000Youth Development$60,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWorld Hope International Inc: $553,914 over 4y, 1.0% of budgetINDIANA WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY: $540,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetTHE CARING FOUNDATION INCORPORATED: $243,590 over 8y, 53% of budgetLIFESONG FOR ORPHANS INC: $227,631 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetMETRO RELIEF: $90,000 over 3y, 8.2% of budgetEQUIP Leadership Inc: $75,000 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetGRIP OUTREACH FOR YOUTH: $60,000 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF GRANT COUNTY INC: $40,000 over 2y, 6.1% of budgetFAMILY SERVICE SOCIETY INC: $40,000 over 7y, 0.6% of budgetCAREY SERVICES INC: $22,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetHope India Mission Inc: $16,000 over 8y, 1.0% of budgetCompassion International Incorporated: $8,568 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetGILEAD MINISTRIES INC: $8,000 over 8y, 0.6% of budgetAWAKENING HOPE INC: $7,500 over 2y, 3.1% of budgetThe Freedom Story: $7,240 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetServants of Christ International: $3,150 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetNational Network of Youth Ministries: $2,700 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCHRIST IN YOUTH INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetINDIANA SPECIAL OLYMPICS INC: $350 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds World Hope International Inc ↗
  • Who funds INDIANA WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds THE CARING FOUNDATION INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds LIFESONG FOR ORPHANS INC ↗
  • Who funds METRO RELIEF ↗
  • Who funds EQUIP Leadership Inc ↗
  • Who funds GRIP OUTREACH FOR YOUTH ↗
  • Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF GRANT COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY SERVICE SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds CAREY SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds Hope India Mission Inc ↗
  • Who funds Compassion International Incorporated ↗
  • Who funds GILEAD MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds AWAKENING HOPE INC ↗
  • Who funds The Freedom Story ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation of Grant County Indiana IncIN15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 9 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of Grant County Indiana Inc · Atlas Foundry Foundation Inc · Boren Foundation Inc · Lilly Endowment Inc · Servant Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Charities Aid Foundation America · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Network for Good · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Ott Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Ott Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%4%15%34%60%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Ott Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to The Ott Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 77 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Ott’s filings →

    More from the funding graph