Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Ortale Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$42k
Granted FY2024still arriving
15
Grants FY2024still arriving
6
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$96kCrime & Legal$38kHuman Services$33kPublic Safety & Disaster$31kRecreation & Sports$20kPhilanthropy$16kHealth$13kArts & Culture$13kOther$0
02FY2024 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k14 grants · $32k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$2,500
Median grant
6
States reached
$783k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PROJECT REDESIGN$10,000
FRIENDS OF WARNER PARKS$5,000
SEWANEE VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT$5,000
HOMELESS CHILDRENS FOUNDATION$5,000
FRIST CENTER FOR VISUAL ARTS$2,500
CAF AMERICA - CAMERON BESPOLKA TRUS$2,500
MUCS CANCER CENTER$2,500
TN INNOCENCE PROJECT$2,500
NASHVILLE CATHOLIC YOUTH WRESTLING$2,000
MARDY FISH CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION$1,000
WAYNE WISE WELLNESS FUND$1,000
GOLF CLUB OF TN SCHOLARSHIP FUND$1,000
RALLY FOUNDATION$1,000
THE WINDSOR CHARITABLE FOUNDATION$1,000
CITY OF BELLE MEADE$250
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–24, $33k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%HOMELESS CHILDRENS FOUNDATION: $5k → 12%PROJECT REDESIGN: $10k → 14%PROJECT REDESIGN: $10k → 14%PROJECT REDESIGN: $5k → 14%PROJECT REDESIGN: $3k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
MA
IA
CA
MO
VA
MD
TN
NC
SC
DC
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

74%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$208k · 18 repeat orgs$73k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +146% since the first grant, against +55% for those funded once.

18 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2024, 10 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
25

Total granted

$208k
$56k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+146%
+55%

Still filing today

50%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 61% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $17k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’21’22’23’24
EducationHuman ServicesHealthPhilanthropyCrime & LegalAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF THE SOUTH
    5× · 2018–2023 · $45k · revenue +49%
  • TI
    TENNESSEE INNOCENCE PROJECT
    4× · 2019–2023 · $36k · revenue +337%
  • PR
    PROJECT REDESIGN INC
    4× · 2021–2024 · $28k · revenue +186%

Funded once

  • SU
    SEWANEE UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2017 · $30k
  • AU
    AUBURN UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2022 · $10k
  • FR
    FATHER RYAN HIGH SCHOOL
    one grant, 2023 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Water Research Foundation

The purpose of the water research foundation (wrf) is a definitive research organization to advance the science of all things water to better meet the evolving needs of its subscribers and the water sector. to engage exclusively in…

Environment
2
College World Golf Championships Foundation Inc

Our mission is to preserve the integrity of college golf, recognizing that our student-athletes not only excel in the sport but also become significant contributors to society. by hosting exceptional ncaa di golf championships, we honor…

Recreation & Sports
3
Vanderbilt University

See Disclosure Above.

Education
4
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
5
American Kennel Club Canine Health Foundation

The mission of the akc canine health foundation, inc. is to fund, advance, and communicate canine health research and science through knowledge and discovery.

Animals
6
Wilson College

Wilson college empowers students to be confident and critical thinkers, creative visionaries, effective communicators, honorable leaders, and agents of justice.

Education
7
Wood Hudson Cancer Research Laboratory Inc

The study of clinical cases and experimental models of cancer for new ways of cancer prevention, diagnosis, prognosis and treatment. the study of environmental causes of cancer, particularly food and drinking water chemcials. the training…

—
8
Ucf Athletics Association Inc

To provide opportunity to young people and develop leaders for industry, philanthropy, education and the community through the intercollegiate athletic experience.

Education
9
Central Indiana Corporate Partnership Inc

Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…

Community Improvement
10
Npr Foundation

The npr foundation ("foundation") is organized and operated exclusively for the benefit of its sole supported organization, national public radio, inc. ("npr inc."). the foundation supports npr inc. through various activities such as…

—
11
Samuel Waxman Cancer Research Foundation

The samuel waxman cancer research foundation (the "foundation") funds innovative research to bring faster cures to patients. in addition to supporting ongoing collaborative research in specific cancers, our scientists are investigating the…

—
12
National Fish and Wildlife Foundation

To sustain, restore, and enhance the nation's fish, wildlife, plants, and habitats.

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Community Foundation of Middle Tennessee Inc; the most unlike its peers is Windsor Charitable Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 23 of the 51 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
9
Early backer (in before they grew)
23/23
Grantees still filing
19/23
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SEWANEE VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT: $31,082 · OtherSEWANEE VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENTSEWANEE UNIVERSITY: $30,000 · OtherSEWANEE UNIVERSITYENSWORTH: $15,000 · OtherENSWORTHAUBURN UNIVERSITY: $10,000 · OtherAUBURN UNIVERSITYFRIST CENTER FOR VISUAL ARTS: $8,500 · OtherFRIST CENTER FOR VISUAL ARTSCAF AMERICA - CAMERON BESPOLKA TRUST: $5,500 · Other+32 more: $37,288 · Other+32 moreUNIVERSITY OF THE SOUTH: $44,887 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF THE S…WARRIOR-SCHOLAR PROJECT FOUNDATION: $5,000 · EducationWARRIOR-SCHOLAR PRO…+1 more: $250 · EducationTENNESSEE INNOCENCE PROJECT: $35,500 · Crime & LegalTENNESSEE INN…PROJECT REDESIGN INC: $27,843 · Human ServicesPROJECT REDES…HOMELESS CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY INC: $5,000 · Human ServicesHOMELESS CHIL…+1 more: $1,000 · Human ServicesTHE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF MIDDLE TENNESSEE INC: $10,000 · PhilanthropyTHE MARDY FISH CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION INC: $4,000 · PhilanthropyRALLY FOUNDATION INC: $3,300 · PhilanthropyFRIENDS OF THE WARNER PARKS INC: $11,500 · Recreation & SportsWAYNE M WISE WELLNESS FUND INC: $5,000 · Health+1 more: $100 · Health
Other$137,370Education$50,137Crime & Legal$35,500Human Services$33,843Philanthropy$17,300Recreation & Sports$11,500Health$5,100

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUNIVERSITY OF THE SOUTH: $44,887 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTENNESSEE INNOCENCE PROJECT: $35,500 over 4y, 6.7% of budgetPROJECT REDESIGN INC: $27,843 over 4y, 6.8% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE WARNER PARKS INC: $11,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetTHE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF MIDDLE TENNESSEE INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWAYNE M WISE WELLNESS FUND INC: $5,000 over 6y, 0.6% of budgetHOMELESS CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetWARRIOR-SCHOLAR PROJECT FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE MARDY FISH CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION INC: $4,000 over 3y, 1.5% of budgetRALLY FOUNDATION INC: $3,300 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetThe Golf Club of Tennessee Scholarship Fund: $3,250 over 4y, 2.2% of budgetNASHVILLE CATHOLIC YOUTH WRESTLING: $2,000 over 1y, 4.6% of budgetNEW YORK ROAD RUNNERS INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDancing with the Stars of Charlotte Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetWINDSOR CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetFAMILY FOUNDATION FUND INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetDOGWOOD FARM SANCTUARY: $1,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetTHISTLE FARMS INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOASTAL CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMONTGOMERY BELL ACADEMY OF THE UNIVERSITY OF NASHVILLE: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHILLWOOD COUNTRY CLUB: $150 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ABILITY EXPERIENCE: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF THE SOUTH ↗
  • Who funds TENNESSEE INNOCENCE PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds PROJECT REDESIGN INC ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE WARNER PARKS INC ↗
  • Who funds THE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF MIDDLE TENNESSEE INC ↗
  • Who funds WAYNE M WISE WELLNESS FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds HOMELESS CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds WARRIOR-SCHOLAR PROJECT FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE MARDY FISH CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds RALLY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds The Golf Club of Tennessee Scholarship Fund ↗
  • Who funds NASHVILLE CATHOLIC YOUTH WRESTLING ↗
  • Who funds NEW YORK ROAD RUNNERS INC ↗
  • Who funds Dancing with the Stars of Charlotte Inc ↗
  • Who funds WINDSOR CHARITABLE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY FOUNDATION FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds DOGWOOD FARM SANCTUARY ↗
  • Who funds THISTLE FARMS INC ↗
  • Who funds COASTAL CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Community Foundation of Middle Tennessee IncTN12× affinity4 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Community Foundation of Middle Tennessee Inc · American Endowment Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Ortale Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Ortale Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 51 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Ortale Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph