Skip to content

· Public charity

The Optimist Club of St Cloud

The purpose of the st cloud optimist club is to develop optimism as a philosophy of life; to promote an active interest in good government and civic affairs; to inspire respect for the law; to promote patriotism and work for international accord and friendship among all people; to aid and encourage the development of youth, in the belief…

$237k
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$32k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Philanthropy$206kRecreation & Sports$42kArts & Culture$18kHousing & Shelter$13kYouth Development$12kFood & Nutrition$12kPublic Safety & Disaster$7kCommunity Improvement$6kOther$0
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 7 grants below total $74,655, the rows itemized in this filing. The $236,582 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $161,927 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k5 grants · $31k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $44k
$6,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$107k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
COMMUNITYGIVING$31,800
GREAT RIVER EDUCATIONAL ARTS THEARE$12,100
SALVATION ARMY - ST CLOUD$7,750
UNITED WAY OF CENTRAL MN$6,000
SARTELL SCHOOL DISTRICT - OAK RIDGE EARLY LEARNING CENTER$6,000
CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE DIOCESE OF ST CLOUD$5,600
SAUK RAPIDS RICE MUSIC BOOSTERS INC$5,405
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–25, $12k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%CATHOLIC CHARITIES: $6k → 11%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE DIOCESE OF ST CLOUD: $6k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
St Cloud Downtown Alliance Foundation

Enhancing and strengthening our community and our regional core.

—
2
Minnesota Council on Foundations

MCF is a vibrant philanthropic community connecting, strengthening and mobilizing the power of philanthropy to advance prosperity and equity.

—
3
Mn Community Measurement

Mn community measurement empowers stakeholders with meaningful information to drive improvement.

Health
4
Minnesota Chamber of Commerce and Industry

The minnesota chamber of commerce proactively leads the business community statewide to: advance pro-business, responsible minnesota public policy that creates jobs and grows the econony; provde member services to address evolving business…

—
5
Minneapolis Regional Chamber of Commerce

Creating powerful advocacy to enhance economic vitality in the minneapolis-st. paul region.

—
6
Community Resource Connections Inc

Improving access to and the effectiveness of services through facilitation and coordination of community services and provision of information and referral services.

Community Improvement
7
Community Shares of Minnesota

The mission of community shares of minnesota is to create a fair, just and equitable minnesota. community shares of minnesota accomplishes its mission by: supporting collective action to eliminate root causes of inequality and injustice;…

—
8
Credit Union Association of the Dakotas

The association works to promote member credit unions as being safe and sound institutions for insured deposits, responsible lending, and the best place for consumers to receive financial services.

—
9
Minnesota Business Partnership

The minnesota business partnership's mission is to maintain a high quality of life for all minnesotans by ensuring that the state's economy remains strong, globally competitive and its prospects for growth bright by working with elected…

—
10
Citizens League

The citizens league is a nonpartisan, nonprofit organization that empowers people to engage in civic life and public policy, to make minnesota a better place to live and work for everyone.

—
11
Boy Scouts of America Council No 604 Blue Mountain Council Inc

To promote, within the territory covered by the charter from time to time granted it by the boy scouts of america and in accordance with the congressional charter, bylaws, and rules and regulations of the boy scouts of america, the…

—
12
African Development Center

Grow businesses, build wealth and increase reinvestement in the african communities of minnesota

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is United Way of Central Minnesota; the most unlike its peers is Central Mn Council of Boy Scouts of America. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
2/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

COMMUNITYGIVING: $199,600 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITYGIVINGDISTRICT 742 SCHOOLS: $17,972 · OtherDISTRICT 742 SCHOOLSCATHEDRAL HIGH SCHOOL: $14,180 · OtherCATHEDRAL HIGH SCHOOLST CLOUD ROTARY FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 · OtherST CLOUD ROTARY FOUNDATION INCSALVATION ARMY: $7,750 · OtherSALVATION ARMYSAUK RAPIDS-RICE SCHOOL DISTRICT: $6,355 · OtherSAUK RAPIDS-RICE SCHOOL DISTRICTEDUCATION MINNESOTA BENTON-STEARNS 7342: $6,000 · OtherEDUCATION MINNESOTA BENTON-STEAR…UNITED WAY OF CENTRAL MINNESOTA: $6,000 · OtherUNITED WAY OF CENTRAL MINNESOTACENTRAL MN COUNCIL OF BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA: $5,700 · OtherCENTRAL MN COUNCIL OF BOY SCOUTS…ANNA MARIES SHELTER: $5,500 · OtherANNA MARIES SHELTERSAUK RAPIDS RICE MUSIC BOOSTERS INC: $5,405 · OtherSAUK RAPIDS RICE MUSIC BOOSTERS …BECKYS TROOP CARE PACKAGES: $5,070 · OtherBECKYS TROOP CARE PACKAGESCITY OF ST CLOUD: $5,000 · OtherGREAT RIVER EDUCATIONAL ARTS THEATRE: $12,100 · Arts & CultureCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE DIOCESE OF ST CLOUD: $11,601 · Human ServicesPUBLIC SAFETY FOUNDATION: $7,000 · Crime & LegalDISTRICT 742 LOCAL EDUCATION ACTIVITIES FOUNDATION: $6,125 · Community Improvement
Philanthropy$199,600Other$94,932Arts & Culture$12,100Human Services$11,601Crime & Legal$7,000Community Improvement$6,125

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCOMMUNITYGIVING: $199,600 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetGREAT RIVER EDUCATIONAL ARTS THEATRE: $12,100 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE DIOCESE OF ST CLOUD: $11,601 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetST CLOUD ROTARY FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 3.1% of budgetPUBLIC SAFETY FOUNDATION: $7,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetDISTRICT 742 LOCAL EDUCATION ACTIVITIES FOUNDATION: $6,125 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetUNITED WAY OF CENTRAL MINNESOTA: $6,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCENTRAL MN COUNCIL OF BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA: $5,700 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

CommunitygivingMN23.6× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Communitygiving · United Way of Central Minnesota · Rick and Helga Bauerly Foundation · Granite Partners Foundation of Minnesota Inc · Initiative Foundation · Ja Wedum Foundation · Morgan Family Foundation · Central Mn Noon Optimist Club Inc · Xcel Energy Foundation · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · Charities Aid Foundation America · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Optimist Club of St Cloud funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Optimist Club of St Cloud. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Optimist Club of St Cloud’s filings →

    More from the funding graph