Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Ohana East Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$146k
Granted FY2024still arriving
16
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
0199% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.

Environment$262kFood & Nutrition$122kHousing & Shelter$88kHealth$59kEducation$29kPublic Safety & Disaster$21kHuman Services$20kRecreation & Sports$16kOther$0
02FY2024 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k10 grants · $56k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $90k
$7,500
Median grant
4
States reached
$4.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BELOVED ASHEVILLE$25,000
CHARLESTON WATERKEEPER$15,000
POSADA$15,000
BARRIER ISLANDS FREE MEDICAL CLINIC INC$15,000
MANNA FOOD BANK$10,000
BEE CAUSE PROJECT INC$10,000
ARKANSAS RIVER WATERSHED COLLABORATIVE$7,500
LOWCOUNTRY FOOD BANK INC$7,500
LOWCOUNTRY LAND TRUST INC$7,500
CARE AND SHARE INC$7,500
PUEBLO RAPE CRISIS SERVICES INC$5,000
OYSTER SOUTH COMPANY$5,000
MY SISTERS HOUSE INC$5,000
NATURE AND WILDLIFE DISCOVERY CENTER$5,000
FIELDS TO FAMILIES$4,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–24, $41k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%TEACHERS SUPPLY CLOSET: $6k → 12%TEACHERS SUPPLY CLOSET: $5k → 12%MY SISTERS HOUSE INC: $5k → 12%TEACHERS SUPPLY CLOSET: $5k → 12%TEACHERS SUPPLY CLOSET: $4k → 12%TEACHERS SUPPLY CLOSET: $3k → 12%TEACHERS SUPPLY CLOSET: $2k → 12%FLORENCE CRITTENTON PROGRAMS OF SOUTH CAROLINA INC: $5k → 12%FLORENCE CRITTENTON PROGRAMS OF SOUTH CAROLINA INC: $5k → 12%FLORENCE CRITTENTON PROGRAMS OF SOUTH CAROLINA INC: $1k → 12%RESPITE CARE OF CHARLESTON: $250 → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

OR
CA
CO
NC
SC
DC
HI
GA

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$580k · 25 repeat orgs$67k to everyone else

25 repeat relationships — 14 still active in FY2024, 11 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

25
14

Total granted

$580k
$32k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+32%
+45%

Still filing today

96%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 76% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $35k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EnvironmentHuman ServicesFood & NutritionEducationHousing & ShelterRecreation & SportsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TB
    THE BEE CAUSE PROJECT INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $68k · revenue +215%
  • CW
    CHARLESTON WATERKEEPER
    6× · 2019–2024 · $65k · revenue +261%
  • P
    POSADA
    6× · 2019–2024 · $53k · revenue +67%

Funded once

  • SI
    SAN ISABEL LAND PROTECTION TRUST
    one grant, 2019 · $5k · revenue -7%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $3k
  • LF
    LOWCOUNTRY FARM CONSERVATION
    one grant, 2021 · $3k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Boulder Watershed Collective

The Boulder Watershed Collective is a 501c3 non-profit stakeholder-driven organization established to address forested watershed health,resiliency and stewardship. We have three program areas: ClimateAdaptation and Resilience Watershed…

Environment
2
Rogue Climate

Rogue Climate's mission is to empower Southern Oregon communities most impacted by climate change including low-income, rural, youth, seniors & communities of color, to win climate justice by organizing for clean energy, sustainable jobs &…

Education
3
Rocky Mountain Wild

Rocky mountain wild works to protect, connect, and restore wildlife and wild lands in the southern rocky mountain region. we work to secure the biodiversity of the mountains, plains, and desert ecosystems of colorado, wyoming, utah, and…

Environment
4
Wildcoast

The mission of wildcoast is to conserve coastal and marine ecosystems and address climate change through natural solutions. our staff is dedicated to conserving threatened and endangered coastlines and wildlife in california and mexico.…

Environment
5
Conservation Legacy

Conservation legacy engages future leaders who protect, restore, and enhance our nation's lands through community-based service.in 2024, conservation legacy engaged 2,524 participants who completed over 1.5 million service hours on public…

Youth Development
6
The Climate Center

The Climate Center is a climate and energy policy nonprofit working to rapidly reduce climate pollution at scale, starting in California.

Education
7
Cowiche Canyon Conservancy

Protecting our shrub-steppe and connecting people to this vanishing landscape.

—
8
Mesa County Land Conservancy Inc

To protect and enhance agricultural land, wildlife habitat and scenic lands in western colorado to benefit the community at large, enrich lives, and provide opportunities for outdoor recreation for future generations.

Environment
9
Aspen Valley Land Trust

Protecting the open land and special places of the roaring fork and middle colorado river valleys for wildlife, agriculture, and community forever.

Environment
10
Conservation Colorado

Our work secures policies and elevates leaders that advance climate action and environmental justice. we help them do it, and hold them to it. we work for a colorado where every community can breathe clean air, drink clean water, protect…

Civil Rights
11
Colorado Legal Services

To provide meaningful access to high quality, civil legal services in the pursuit of justice for as many low income persons and members of vulnerable populations throughout colorado as possible.

Crime & Legal
12
Colorado Food Cluster Inc

Provide opportunities for all to thrive by offering free food resources to communities.

Food & Nutrition

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Lowcountry Land Trust Inc and the most unlike its peers is The Institute for Environmental Solutions. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyEnvironmental Conservation …Health Access Advocacy and …Food Banks and PantriesDomestic Violence ServicesLocal Food System Organizat…Community Foundations
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 30 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%3%<5yr14%6%5–10yr19%25%10–20yr16%22%20–35yr13%34%35–55yr16%9%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%1%<5yr14%7%5–10yr19%31%10–20yr16%19%20–35yr13%40%35–55yr16%2%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 3% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
3%1/38
the rest of the field
13%
240,395/1,819,527

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

37 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 37 of the 42 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
12
Early backer (in before they grew)
34/37
Grantees still filing
25/37
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

CHARLESTON WATERKEEPER — $65,000 · EnvironmentCHARLESTON WATERKEEPERLOWCOUNTRY LAND TRUST INC — $32,500 · EnvironmentLOWCOUNTRY LAND TRUST INCSouth Carolina Coastal Conservation League Inc — $25,000 · EnvironmentSouth Carolina Coastal Conserva…NATURE AND WILDLIFE DISCOVERY CENTER — $20,500 · EnvironmentNATURE AND WILDLIFE DISCOVERY C…ARKANSAS RIVER WATERSHED COLLABORATIVE — $15,000 · EnvironmentARKANSAS RIVER WATERSHED COLLAB…THE COLORADO MOUNTAIN CLUB — $13,500 · EnvironmentTHE COLORADO MOUNTAIN CLUB+4 more — $8,621 · EnvironmentLOWCOUNTRY FOOD BANK INC — $36,750 · OtherLOWCOUNTRY FOOD BANK INCAMERICAN RED CROSS - COASTAL SOUTH CAROLINA CHAPTE — $12,500 · OtherAMERICAN RED CROSS - COA…THE INSTITUTE FOR ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS — $9,000 · OtherTHE INSTITUTE FOR ENVIRO…Pueblo Rescue Mission — $8,000 · OtherPueblo Rescue MissionSAN ISABEL LAND PROTECTION TRUST — $5,000 · OtherCharleston Moves — $15,075 · OtherCharleston MovesLowcountry Local First — $13,000 · OtherLowcountry Local FirstHAWAII COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $10,000 · OtherHAWAII COMMUNITY FOUNDAT…XERCES SOCIETY INC — $8,000 · OtherXERCES SOCIETY INCWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC — $6,098 · Other+8 more — $17,746 · Other+8 morePOSADA — $52,500 · Housing & ShelterPOSADABELOVED ASHEVILLE — $25,000 · Housing & ShelterBELOVED ASHEV…THE BEE CAUSE PROJECT INC — $67,500 · EducationTHE BEE CAUS…BICYCLE COLORADO — $4,500 · EducationBICYCLE COLO…Care and Share Inc — $41,623 · Food & NutritionCare and Sha…OYSTER SOUTH COMPANY — $19,000 · Food & NutritionOYSTER SOUTH…MANNA FOOD BANK INC — $10,000 · Food & NutritionMANNA FOOD B…BARRIER ISLANDS FREE MEDICAL CLINIC — $50,000 · HealthBARRIER IS…Pueblo Rape Crisis Services Inc — $9,000 · HealthPueblo Rap…TEACHERS SUPPLY CLOSET — $24,384 · Human ServicesTEACHERS …FIELDS TO FAMILIES — $11,552 · Human ServicesFIELDS TO…Florence Crittenton Programs of South Carolina Inc — $11,100 · Human ServicesFlorence …My Sister's House Inc — $9,000 · Human ServicesMy Sister…+1 more — $250 · Human Services
Environment$180,121Other$141,169Housing & Shelter$77,500Education$72,000Food & Nutrition$70,623Health$59,000Human Services$56,286

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE BEE CAUSE PROJECT INC — $67,500 over 8y, 3.4% of budgetCHARLESTON WATERKEEPER — $65,000 over 6y, 3.1% of budgetPOSADA — $52,500 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetBARRIER ISLANDS FREE MEDICAL CLINIC — $50,000 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetCare and Share Inc — $41,623 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetLOWCOUNTRY FOOD BANK INC — $36,750 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetLOWCOUNTRY LAND TRUST INC — $32,500 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetBELOVED ASHEVILLE — $25,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSouth Carolina Coastal Conservation League Inc — $25,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetTEACHERS SUPPLY CLOSET — $24,384 over 6y, 1.1% of budgetNATURE AND WILDLIFE DISCOVERY CENTER — $20,500 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetOYSTER SOUTH COMPANY — $19,000 over 5y, 3.3% of budgetCharleston Moves — $15,075 over 5y, 1.9% of budgetARKANSAS RIVER WATERSHED COLLABORATIVE — $15,000 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetTHE COLORADO MOUNTAIN CLUB — $13,500 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetLowcountry Local First — $13,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetFIELDS TO FAMILIES — $11,552 over 3y, 2.2% of budgetFlorence Crittenton Programs of South Carolina Inc — $11,100 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetHAWAII COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMANNA FOOD BANK INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE INSTITUTE FOR ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS — $9,000 over 3y, 4.2% of budgetMy Sister's House Inc — $9,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetPueblo Rape Crisis Services Inc — $9,000 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetXERCES SOCIETY INC — $8,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetPueblo Rescue Mission — $8,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC — $6,098 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSAN ISABEL LAND PROTECTION TRUST — $5,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetBICYCLE COLORADO — $4,500 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetGRID ALTERNATIVES COLORADO INC — $3,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHRIVE SC — $2,500 over 1y, 5.4% of budgetNATIONAL PARKS CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION — $2,374 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPUBLIC BROADCASTING OF COLORADO INC — $1,873 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOLORADO YOUTH CORPS ASSOCIATION — $1,873 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBoys & Girls Clubs of Pueblo County — $1,873 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSIERRA CLUB FOUNDATION — $1,374 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRESPITE CARE OF CHARLESTON — $250 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a loosely connected circle, clustered around a few shared anchors.

Coastal Community Fou…The Joanna FoundationThe Denver FoundationColorado Gives Founda…Pathfinder Foundation…Henry & Sylvia Yaschi…The Colorado Health F…United Way of Pueblo …Post and Courier Foun…Advanced Technology I…Robert Hoag Rawlings …Caring for Colorado C…
Coastal Community Foundation of South Carolina IncSC31.3× affinity13 shared granteesties to 7 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Coastal Community Foundation of South Carolina Inc · The Joanna Foundation · The Denver Foundation · Colorado Gives Foundation · Pathfinder Foundation Inc · Henry & Sylvia Yaschik Foundation Inc · The Colorado Health Foundation · United Way of Pueblo County Colorado Inc · Post and Courier Foundation · Advanced Technology International · Robert Hoag Rawlings Foundation · Caring for Colorado Centennial Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Ohana East Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 22%
  • Xerces Society Inc — 22% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
10report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 42 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines