· Private foundation
The O'Neil Family Foundation Inc
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k10 grants · $51k
- $10k–50k20 grants · $365k
- $50k–250k9 grants · $718k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| NEXT ONE UP FOUNDATION | $100,000 |
| THE FIRST TEE OF BALTIMORE | $100,000 |
| MERCY HIGH SCHOOL | $100,000 |
| THE LOYOLA SCHOOL | $92,500 |
| LOYOLA BLAKEFIELD | $75,000 |
| JEMICY SCHOOL | $75,000 |
| SAINT IGNATIUS LOYOLA ACADEMY | $75,000 |
| ARCHDIOCESE OF BALTIMORE | $50,000 |
| THE FAMILY TREE | $50,000 |
| CHURCH OF THE NATIVITY | $30,000 |
| GILCHRIST CENTER | $30,000 |
| NW CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION | $30,000 |
| WOMEN'S EDUCATION ALLIANCE | $30,000 |
| BALTIMORE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION | $27,500 |
| HEALTHCARE FOR THE HOMELESS INC | $25,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $348k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 88% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +37% since the first grant, against +37% for the ones you funded once.
60 repeat relationships — 32 still active in FY2025, 28 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $55k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TFTHE FAMILY TREE INC6× · 2017–2025 · $450k · revenue +109%
- TFTHE FIRST TEE OF GREATER BALTIMORE INC5× · 2021–2025 · $435k · revenue +65%
- SISHAREBABY INC9× · 2017–2025 · $394k · revenue +223%
Funded once
- COCHRISTOPHER O'NEIL MEMORIAL FUNDone grant, 2019 · $75k
- LBLONG BEACH CATHOLIC REGIONAL SCHOOLone grant, 2018 · $50k
- WWWALK WITH SALLYone grant, 2020 · $50k · revenue -36%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
As a statewide resource center, the school provides outreach, educational and residential services for students to reach their fullest potential by preparing them to be as successful, independent, and well-rounded contributing members of…
The arc baltimore supports people with developmental disabilities to lead fulfilling lives with a sense of belonging, purpose, and meaningful relationships.
Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…
Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…
Johns hopkins community physicians, inc (jhcp), a valued member of johns hopkins medicine, is a network of medical practices strategically positioned throughout communities in maryland and dc. we strive to meet the needs of each community…
Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…
Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland, school of medicine, administrative support services are provided to the physician practices of the university of maryland, including but not limited to information technology,…
Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…
Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…
Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…
Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…
To cultivate career advancement opportunities for local talent, facilitate talent acquisition for local employers, increase access to capital for local entrepreneurs' social ventures, and foster cross-sector collaboration to address city…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Sisters Circle Inc and the most unlike its peers is The Schuster Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 36 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
58 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 58 of the 106 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds THE FAMILY TREE INC ↗
- Who funds THE FIRST TEE OF GREATER BALTIMORE INC ↗
- Who funds SHAREBABY INC ↗
- Who funds THE JEMICY SCHOOL INC ↗
- Who funds ROLAND PARK COUNTRY SCHOOL INC ↗
- Who funds HEALTH CARE FOR THE HOMELESS INC ↗
- Who funds THE MARYLAND SPCA INC ↗
- Who funds NEXT ONE UP FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds WOMENS EDUCATION ALLIANCE INC ↗
- Who funds THE LEAGUE FOR PEOPLE WITH DISABILITIES ↗
- Who funds NW Childrens Foundation ↗
- Who funds BRINGING HOPE HOME ↗
- Who funds THE HERREN PROJECT ↗
- Who funds SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds WALK WITH SALLY ↗
- Who funds The Phoenix of Santa Barbara Inc ↗
- Who funds St Anns Center for Children Youth and Families ↗
- Who funds CLOVERLEAF EQUINE CENTER ↗
- Who funds EMPOWER HER NETWORK INC DBA EMPOWERED NETWORK ↗
- Who funds BALTIMORE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Baltimore Community Foundation Inc · The United Way of Central Maryland Inc · The Marion I & Henry J Knott Foundation Inc · T Rowe Price Program for Charitable Giving Inc · France-Merrick Foundation Inc · The Abell Foundation Inc · Fund for Educational Excellence Inc · Associated Jewish Charities of Baltimore · Brown Advisory Charitable Foundation Inc · Thomas Wilson Sanitarium for Children of Baltimore City · The Bunting Family Foundation · Edward St John Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The O'Neil Family Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Empower Her Network Inc Dba Empowered Network — 47% of income from government
- Parks and People Inc — 43% of income from government
- Baltimore Safe Haven Corp — 28% of income from government
- Medstar Health Inc — 23% of income from government
- Boston Medical Center Corporation — 23% of income from government
- The Family Tree Inc — 9% of income from government
- Goodwill Industries of the Chesapeake Inc — 7% of income from government
- St Anns Center for Children Youth and Families — 6% of income from government
- Health Care for the Homeless Inc — 2% of income from government
- Fund for Educational Excellence Inc — 1% of income from government
- Sinai Hospital of Baltimore Inc — 0% of income from government
- Mcdonogh School Incorporated — 0% of income from government
- Mt Washington Pediatric Hospital Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.