Skip to content

· Private foundation

The O'Melia Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$361k
Granted FY2025still arriving
20
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$230k
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Health$731kReligion$375kPhilanthropy$250kEducation$200kPublic Safety & Disaster$135kHuman Services$47kYouth Development$45kArts & Culture$36kOther$0
02FY2025 · 20 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k14 grants · $61k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $70k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $230k
$5,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$3.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
INFIRMARY HEALTH SYSTEM INC$230,000
SACRED HEART CHURCH$20,000
ST IGNATIUS CHURCH$20,000
PILOTS FOR CHRIST$10,000
BAYSIDE ACADEMY$10,000
GROVE HILL FIRE DEPARTMENT$10,000
CULTURAL ARTS CENTER$5,000
RHINELANDER COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$5,000
COFFEEVILLE VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT$5,000
RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE OF MOBILE$5,000
CLARKE SCHOOL FOUNDATION INC$5,000
FULTON VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT$5,000
VISITATION MONASTERY$5,000
GROVE HILL HISTORICAL SOCIETY$5,000
CAMP RAP A HOPE$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–22, $13k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%MARY'S SHELTER: $1k → 12%CHILDRENS ADVOCACY CENTER: $10k → 13%MARY'S SHELTER: $1k → 12%MARYS SHELTER: $1k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
WI
NV
IA
OH
VA
MD
TN
NC
SC
AL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.6M · 43 repeat orgs$57k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +18% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

43 repeat relationships: 18 still active in FY2025, 25 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

43
12

Total granted

$1.6M
$52k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+18%
0%

Still filing today

40%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEducationArts & CultureHuman ServicesCrime & LegalHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IH
    INFIRMARY HEALTH SYSTEM INC
    2× · 2024–2025 · $459k · revenue +8%
  • PF
    PILOTS FOR CHRIST INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $90k · revenue +42%
  • BA
    BAYSIDE ACADEMY INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $49k · revenue +58%

Funded once

  • CA
    CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER
    one grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue -11%
  • UO
    UNIV OF AL AT BIRMINGHAM
    one grant, 2020 · $10k
  • CC
    CLARKE COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY
    one grant, 2024 · $5k · revenue -37%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Chattahoochee Hospice Inc

The organization pledges to provide quality programs, service, and technology to meet the unique physical, emotional, and spiritual needs of the terminally ill and their families, and to educate the community about end of life issues.

Human Services
2
Alabama Healthcare Hall of Fame
Arts & Culture
3
Cumberland Medical Center

Cumberland Medical Center provides quality healthcare, in alignment with Covenant Health's mission to serve the community by improving the quality of life through better health, regardless of the patient's ability to pay.

Health
4
Alabama Children's Hospital Foundation

The mission of Alabama Children's Hospital Foundation (The Foundation) is to support the activities and mission of the Hospital (CHA).

Health
5
CalvertHealth Medical Center Inc

Calverthealth medical center provides quality inpatient and ambulatory health care to the people of southern maryland that is accessible, cost-effective and compassionate. chmc works in partnership with the community to improve the health…

Health
6
Claiborne Medical Center

Claiborne Medical Center provides quality healthcare, in alignment with Covenant Health's mission to serve the community by improving the quality of life through better health, regardless of a patient's ability to pay.

Health
7
Crouse Health Foundation Inc

The mission of crouse health foundation, inc is to support crouse hospital inc in providing the best in patient care and promoting community health.

Health
8
Shelby County Children's Advocacy Center

Shelby County Children's Advocacy Center, Inc. is a non-profit organization that is dedicated to ending child abuse through education, advocacy, counseling, family support, and the pursuit of justice.

Crime & Legal
9
Christian Healthcare Specialists

Christian Healthcare Specialists exists to provide exceptional medical services to the community, guided by Biblical values.

Health
10
Central Mississippi Health Services

Central mississippi health services is dedicated to improving healthcare access and eliminating health disparities within the communities we serve by providing access to quality primary and tertiary healthcare services in an environment…

—
11
Alabama Christian Academy

To glorify god by providing a quality, christ-centered education which challenges students and teachers to maximize their potential so that graduates are prepared to further their education while becoming productive christian citizens.

—
12
Christian Services for Children in Alabama

The mission of christian services for children in alabama is to show the love of christ by providing counseling and other related services to children and their families.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Community Foundation of South Alabama; the most unlike its peers is Cultural Arts Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

25 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 25 of the 58 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
24/25
Grantees still filing
17/25
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ST IGNATIUS CHURCH: $135,000 · OtherST IGNATIUS CHURCHSACRED HEART CHURCH: $120,000 · OtherSACRED HEART CHURCHINFIRMARY HEALTH SYSTEMS: $108,000 · OtherINFIRMARY HEALTH SYSTEMSPILOTS FOR CHRIST INC: $90,000 · OtherPILOTS FOR CHRIST INCGROVE HILL FIRE DEPARTMENT: $60,000 · OtherGROVE HILL FIRE DEPARTMENTCAMP RAP A HOPE: $45,000 · Other+36 more: $422,000 · Other+36 moreINFIRMARY HEALTH SYSTEM INC: $459,000 · HealthINFIRMARY HEALTH SYSTEM INCST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $40,000 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPI…THOMAS HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC: $37,000 · HealthTHOMAS HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC+4 more: $30,000 · HealthTHE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF SOUTH ALABAMA: $220,000 · PhilanthropyTHE COMMUNITY…BAYSIDE ACADEMY INC: $49,000 · EducationPRICHARD PREPARATORY SCHOOL INC: $10,000 · EducationCLARKE SCHOOL FOUNDATION: $9,000 · EducationRHINELANDER COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $30,000 · Community ImprovementGROVE HILL ARTS COUNCIL INC: $10,000 · Arts & CultureCLARKE COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $5,000 · Arts & CultureTHE FULL LIFE AHEAD FOUNDATION: $4,000 · Arts & CultureThe Childrens Advocacy Center: $15,000 · Crime & Legal
Other$980,000Health$566,000Philanthropy$220,000Education$68,000Community Improvement$30,000Arts & Culture$19,000Crime & Legal$15,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetINFIRMARY HEALTH SYSTEM INC: $459,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetTHE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF SOUTH ALABAMA: $220,000 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetPILOTS FOR CHRIST INC: $90,000 over 6y, 3.0% of budgetBAYSIDE ACADEMY INC: $49,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $40,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHOMAS HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC: $37,000 over 6y, 1.5% of budgetUMS-WRIGHT CORPORATION: $30,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetRHINELANDER COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $30,000 over 5y, 2.4% of budgetThe Childrens Advocacy Center: $15,000 over 2y, 3.4% of budgetThe Children's Hospital of Alabama: $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPRICHARD PREPARATORY SCHOOL INC: $10,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetCHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER: $10,000 over 1y, 3.1% of budgetGROVE HILL ARTS COUNCIL INC: $10,000 over 2y, 12% of budgetVictory Health Partners Inc: $10,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetCLARKE SCHOOL FOUNDATION: $9,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetMARYMOUNT UNIVERSITY: $6,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCLARKE COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $5,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetCultural Arts Center: $5,000 over 1y, 58% of budgetMcKemie Place Inc: $4,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetTHE FULL LIFE AHEAD FOUNDATION: $4,000 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetAutism2Ability Inc: $4,000 over 1y, 9.2% of budgetFOREST HISTORY SOCIETY INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetMarys Shelter: $3,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetMERCY LIFE OF ALABAMA: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds INFIRMARY HEALTH SYSTEM INC ↗
  • Who funds THE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF SOUTH ALABAMA ↗
  • Who funds PILOTS FOR CHRIST INC ↗
  • Who funds BAYSIDE ACADEMY INC ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds THOMAS HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds UMS-WRIGHT CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds RHINELANDER COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds The Childrens Advocacy Center ↗
  • Who funds The Children's Hospital of Alabama ↗
  • Who funds Catholic Social Services of Montgomery ↗
  • Who funds PRICHARD PREPARATORY SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds GROVE HILL ARTS COUNCIL INC ↗
  • Who funds Victory Health Partners Inc ↗
  • Who funds CLARKE SCHOOL FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Crampton Trust #1255000731 Regions Bank TrusteeAL22× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Crampton Trust #1255000731 Regions Bank Trustee · J L Bedsole Foundation Regions Bank Co-Trustee · Rjjb Family Foundation · Mapp Family Foundation · Alabama Power Foundation Inc · The Miller Charitable Foundation Inc · Mayer & Arlene Mitchell Charitable Foundation · Cd Helen and Jeff Glaze Foundation · As Mitchell Foundation Inc · Hearin - Chandler Foundation · Harrigan Family Foundation · Thomas L Turner Charitable Trust Regions Bank

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The O'Melia Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The O'Melia Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%4%15%34%60%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 58 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on O'Melia’s filings →

    More from the funding graph