· Private foundation
The O'Hanian-Szostak Family Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k18 grants · $59k
- $10k–50k9 grants · $143k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $100k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| COLBY COLLEGE | $100,000 |
| BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF PROVIDENCE | $35,000 |
| WOMEN & INFANTS HOSPITAL | $25,000 |
| EAST BAY FOOD PANTRY & THRIFT SHOP | $17,500 |
| RI COMMUNITY FOOD BANK | $15,000 |
| COGGESHALL FARM | $10,000 |
| CENTER FOR WOMEN & ENTERPRISE | $10,000 |
| RI HOSPITAL FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| HASBRO CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL | $10,000 |
| MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL | $10,000 |
| RHODE ISLAND PHILHARMONIC MUSIC SCHOOL | $6,000 |
| CROSSROADS RHODE ISLAND | $5,000 |
| SAVE THE BAY | $5,000 |
| HOPE HEALTH | $5,000 |
| PRESIDENT AND FELLOWS OF HARVARD COLLEGE | $5,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $58k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +33% since the first grant, against +22% for the ones you funded once.
35 repeat relationships — 24 still active in FY2025, 11 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $7k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
The President and Trustees of Colby College8× · 2017–2025 · $355k · revenue +37%
WOMEN & INFANTS HOSPITAL OF RI9× · 2017–2025 · $212k · revenue +25%
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF PROVIDENCE6× · 2018–2025 · $116k · revenue +47%
Funded once
DUKE UNIVERSITYgraduatedone grant, 2019 · $5k · revenue +44%- NYNEW YORK PRESBYTERIAN FUND INC OFFICE OF DEVELOPMENTone grant, 2021 · $5k
- KNKIPP NYCone grant, 2020 · $5k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.
The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…
Wentworth institute of technology is a nationally recognized private coeducational and residential university of higher education with a mission to empower, inspire and innovate through experiential learning with a core purpose of career…
Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…
The mission of rhode island school of design, through its college and museum,is to educate its students and the public in the creation and (see schedule o)appreciation of works of art and design, to discover and transmit knowledge and to…
Bates is a college of the liberal arts and sciences, and is a coeducational, nonsectarian, residential college with special commitments to academic rigor, and to assuring in all of its efforts the dignity of each individual, and access to…
Saint anselm is a catholic, benedictine college providing all of its students a distinctive liberal arts education that incorporates opportunities for professional and career preparation. it does so in a learning community that encourages…
Northeast college of health sciences (the college) is committed to academic excellence, leadership, and professional best practices in the health sciences.
Regis college, through education in the arts, sciences, and professions empowers women and men to challenge themselves academically, to serve and to lead. a catholic college, regis is a diverse and welcoming community guided by the values…
Mitchell college educates students through a highly individualized educational approach that brings forward each student's potential, reveals their strengths, and fosters personal growth.
Dean college is a private, residential new england college grounded in a culture and tradition that all students deserve the opportunity to discover and exceed their greatest aspirations. a personal and transformative community since 1865,…
See detailed description of organization's primary mission provided on schedule o
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Boys and Girls Clubs of Providence and the most unlike its peers is National Association of Letter Carriers #3166. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 55 years old; the field is 19. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
34 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 34 of the 65 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds The President and Trustees of Colby College ↗
- Who funds WOMEN & INFANTS HOSPITAL OF RI ↗
- Who funds SOPHIA ACADEMY ↗
- Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF PROVIDENCE ↗
- Who funds LINCOLN SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds CROSSROADS RHODE ISLAND ↗
- Who funds THE RHODE ISLAND COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SAVE THE BAY INC ↗
- Who funds BRYANT UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds President and Fellows of Harvard College ↗
- Who funds CENTRAL CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOL OF LAWRENCE INC ↗
- Who funds BLITHEWOLD INC ↗
- Who funds DORCAS INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE OF RHODE ISLAND INC ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF AMERICA ↗
- Who funds CENTER FOR WOMEN & ENTERPRISE INC ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF LETTER CARRIERS #3166 ↗
- Who funds Trinity Repertory Company ↗
- Who funds THE WHEELER SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds PROVIDENCE PUBLIC LIBRARY ↗
- Who funds WGBH Educational Foundation ↗
- Who funds DUKE UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds HOPEHEALTH ↗
- Who funds THE PROVIDENCE CENTER INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Amica Companies Foundation · June Rockwell Levy Foundation Incorporated · The Rhode Island Community Foundation · The Champlin Foundation · United Way of Rhode Island Inc · Citizens Charitable Foundation · Ida Ballou Littlefield Memorial Trust · Textron Charitable Trust Dtd 122353 · Mary D Chafee Fund Co Mark Chafee · The Sand Foundation · Ralph R Papitto & Barbara a Papitto Private Family Foundation · Fidelity Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The O'Hanian-Szostak Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Center for Women & Enterprise Inc — 27% of income from government
- President and Fellows of Harvard College — 7% of income from government
- Stonewall Library and Archives Inc — 1% of income from government
- Wgbh Educational Foundation — 1% of income from government
- Central Catholic High School of Lawrence Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.