Skip to content

· Private foundation

The O'Brien Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$780k
Granted FY2025still arriving
56
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$125k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$3.5MHousing & Shelter$595kReligion$477kHuman Services$322kHealth$307kRecreation & Sports$281kPhilanthropy$275kYouth Development$157kOther$0
02FY2025 · 56 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k32 grants · $112k
  • $10k–50k20 grants · $292k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $375k
$5,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$846k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIVERSITY OF SAN FRANCISCO$125,000
BAY SCHOLARS$100,000
MERCY HIGH SCHOOL$100,000
Individual grant recipient$50,000
ST IGNATIUS COLLEGE PREPARATORY$27,600
CATHOLIC CHARITIES$25,000
CALIFORNIA HOMEBUILDING FOUNDATION$25,000
FLINTRIDGE SACRED HEART ACADEMY$25,000
JUSTIN SIENA HIGH SCHOOL LEAP$24,500
HANNA ACADEMY$20,000
CATHOLIC WORKER HOUSE$15,000
ST PETER'S CATHOLIC SCHOOL$10,000
SACRED HEART SCHOOLS$10,000
ALAMEDA BOYS & GIRLS CLUB INC$10,000
HOMEAID OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $57k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 96% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%NORTH COAST OPPORTUNITIES INC: $5k → 18%WOMEN INSPIRIT INC: $500 → 8%NORTH COAST OPPORTUNITIES INC: $5k → 18%WOMEN INSPIRIT INC: $500 → 8%NORTH COAST OPPORTUNITIES INC: $5k → 18%WOMEN INSPIRIT INC: $500 → 8%NORTH COAST OPPORTUNITIES INC: $5k → 18%WOMEN INSPIRIT INC: $500 → 8%NORTH COAST OPPORTUNITIES INC: $5k → 18%WOMEN INSPIRIT INC: $500 → 8%NORTH COAST OPPORTUNITIES INC: $5k → 18%NORTH COAST OPPORTUNITIES INC: $2k → 18%NORTH COAST OPPORTUNITIES INC: $2k → 18%CATHOLIC CHARITIES CYO: $10k → 10%CATHOLIC CHARITIES CYO: $10k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
MA
CA
UT
MO
MD
TN
DC
HI
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$5.8M · 56 repeat orgs$260k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +63% since the first grant, against +10% for those funded once.

56 repeat relationships: 46 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

56
24

Total granted

$5.8M
$221k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+63%
+10%

Still filing today

41%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $39k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthHousing & ShelterPhilanthropyYouth DevelopmentHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • University of San Francisco
    8× · 2017–2025 · $1.7M · revenue +14%
  • BS
    BAY SCHOLARS
    8× · 2017–2025 · $675k · revenue +165%
  • RE
    RAVENSWOOD EDUCATION FOUNDATION
    8× · 2017–2025 · $130k · revenue +212%

Funded once

  • SC
    ST CATHERINE OF SIENA PARISH
    one grant, 2022 · $63k
  • PD
    PROJECT DESTINED INC
    one grant, 2023 · $50k · revenue -45%
  • HB
    HERS BREAST CANCER FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2024 · $10k · revenue +10%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Ucsf Foundation Investment Company

The organization provides professional investment management services for endowed gifts and financial assets entrusted to the ucsf foundation.

Education
2
Ucsf Health Medical Foundation

See schedule othe mission of ucsf health medical foundation is threefold: 1) to establish, operate and maintain medical clinics for the provision of healthcare services in california; 2) to promote health by providing, coordinating,…

Health
3
Sutter Bay Hospitals

MISSION STATEMENT: MISSION: CARING FOR OUR PATIENTS FIRST AND OUR PEOPLE ALWAYS. VISION: TO BE THE MOST COMPREHENSIVE, INTEGRATED AND CONNECTED HEALTH SYSTEM FOR GETTING AND STAYING WELL. VALUES: EXCELLENCE - We deliver high-quality,…

Health
4
University of California San Francisco Foundation

Organization's mission ====================== the university of california, san francisco(ucsf) is among the world's leading universities dedicated to advancing health worldwide through biomedical research, graduate-level education in the…

Education
5
California Pacific Medical Center Foundation

MISSION STATEMENT: MISSION: CARING FOR OUR PATIENTS FIRST AND OUR PEOPLE ALWAYS. VISION: TO BE THE MOST COMPREHENSIVE, INTEGRATED AND CONNECTED HEALTH SYSTEM FOR GETTING AND STAYING WELL. VALUES: EXCELLENCE - We deliver high-quality,…

Health
6
Ucsf Health Community Hospitals Fka Saint Francis Memorial Hospital

Ucsf health community hospital's mission statement is caring, healing, teaching, and discovering.

Health
7
The San Diego Foundation

The san diego foundation inspires enduring philanthropy and enables community solutions to improve the quality of life in our region.

Philanthropy
8
California Healthcare Foundation

Chcf is dedicated to advancing meaningful, measurable improvements in the way the health care delivery system provides care to the people of california, particularly those with low incomes and those whose needs are not well served by the…

—
9
Housing Trust Silicon Valley

Our mission at housing trust silicon valley, is to use transformative housing finance and public and private partnerships to create more equitable and affordable communities.

Housing & Shelter
10
Sacramento Region Community Foundation

The Sacramento Region Community Foundation leads, serves, and inspires enduring philanthropy for a just and vibrant Sacramento region.

Philanthropy
11
San Francisco Challenge dba AmericaOne
Recreation & Sports
12
St Francis Foundation of Santa Barbara

The mission of st. francis foundation of santa barbara is to promote and support health care.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Catholic Charities Cyo of the Archdiocese of San Francisco; the most unlike its peers is Rich May Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

35 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 35 of the 89 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
12
Early backer (in before they grew)
35/35
Grantees still filing
28/35
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $300,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientSACRED HEART SCHOOLS ATHERTON: $276,000 · OtherSACRED HEART SCHOOLS ATHERTONCatholic Charities San Bernardino & Riverside Counties: $200,000 · OtherCatholic Charities San Bernardino & Riverside Coun…MERCY HIGH SCHOOL: $200,000 · OtherMERCY HIGH SCHOOLIGNATIAN CORPORATION SAINT IGNATIUS HIGH SCHOOL: $142,775 · OtherHOMEAID OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA: $135,000 · OtherPANETTA INSTITUTE: $115,625 · OtherCATHOLIC WORKER HOUSE: $105,000 · OtherST PIUS SCHOOL: $100,000 · OtherCHILD & FAMILY INSTITUTE OF MENLO PARK: $100,000 · OtherST PIUS CHURCH: $95,000 · Other+51 more: $1,050,887 · Other+51 moreUniversity of San Francisco: $1,662,946 · EducationUniversity of San FranciscoBAY SCHOLARS: $675,000 · EducationBAY SCHOLARSCalifornia Homebuilding Foundation: $185,000 · EducationCalifornia Homebuilding FoundationRAVENSWOOD EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $130,000 · Education+2 more: $115,000 · EducationTIDES FOUNDATION: $270,000 · PhilanthropyST BALDRICK'S FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 · Philanthropy+3 more: $11,500 · PhilanthropyBRIDGE HOUSING CORPORATION: $105,000 · Housing & ShelterFirm Foundation Community Housing: $35,000 · Housing & ShelterRebuilding Together Peninsula: $35,000 · Housing & ShelterEDEN HOUSING INC: $10,000 · Housing & ShelterALAMEDA BOYS & GIRLS CLUB INC: $70,000 · Youth DevelopmentRich May Foundation: $10,000 · Youth DevelopmentWomens Coaching Alliance: $10,000 · Youth DevelopmentSTANFORD HEALTH CARE: $32,500 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $20,000 · HealthSEQUOIA HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $16,000 · HealthHERS BREAST CANCER FOUNDATION: $10,000 · HealthQUEEN OF THE VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION: $4,000 · HealthNORTH COAST OPPORTUNITIES INC: $34,000 · Human ServicesCATHOLIC CHARITIES CYO OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF SAN FRANCISCO: $20,000 · Human ServicesWOMEN INSPIRIT INC: $2,500 · Human ServicesKAMUKAMA FOUNDATION: $34,000 · International
Other$2,820,287Education$2,767,946Philanthropy$306,500Housing & Shelter$185,000Youth Development$90,000Health$82,500Human Services$56,500International$34,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUniversity of San Francisco: $1,662,946 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetBAY SCHOLARS: $675,000 over 8y, 14% of budgetTIDES FOUNDATION: $270,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCatholic Charities San Bernardino & Riverside Counties: $200,000 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetCalifornia Homebuilding Foundation: $185,000 over 7y, 2.3% of budgetRAVENSWOOD EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $130,000 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetBRIDGE HOUSING CORPORATION: $105,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetSt Francis Center: $81,000 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetALAMEDA BOYS & GIRLS CLUB INC: $70,000 over 8y, 1.0% of budgetPOSITIVE COACHING ALLIANCE: $65,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetPROJECT DESTINED INC: $50,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetFirm Foundation Community Housing: $35,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetRebuilding Together Peninsula: $35,000 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetNORTH COAST OPPORTUNITIES INC: $34,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetKAMUKAMA FOUNDATION: $34,000 over 3y, 1.4% of budgetSTANFORD HEALTH CARE: $32,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetST BALDRICK'S FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES CYO OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF SAN FRANCISCO: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetALAMEDA COUNTY COMMUNITY FOOD BANK: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $20,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetSEQUOIA HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $16,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetHERS BREAST CANCER FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetRich May Foundation: $10,000 over 1y, 12% of budgetEDEN HOUSING INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY GREATER SAN FRANCISCO: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE AMERICAN IRELAND FUND (DBA THE IRELAND FUNDS AMERICA/THE IRELAND FUNDS): $4,750 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetTHE KOHANAIKI FOUNDATION: $4,000 over 8y, 40% of budgetSMILE TRAIN INC: $4,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetAtherton Police Officers Assn: $4,000 over 8y, 0.7% of budgetQUEEN OF THE VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION: $4,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWOMEN INSPIRIT INC: $2,500 over 5y, 1.0% of budgetRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES - BAY AREA: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds University of San Francisco ↗
  • Who funds BAY SCHOLARS ↗
  • Who funds TIDES FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Catholic Charities San Bernardino & Riverside Counties ↗
  • Who funds California Homebuilding Foundation ↗
  • Who funds RAVENSWOOD EDUCATION FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BRIDGE HOUSING CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds St Francis Center ↗
  • Who funds ALAMEDA BOYS & GIRLS CLUB INC ↗
  • Who funds POSITIVE COACHING ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds PROJECT DESTINED INC ↗
  • Who funds Firm Foundation Community Housing ↗
  • Who funds Rebuilding Together Peninsula ↗
  • Who funds NORTH COAST OPPORTUNITIES INC ↗
  • Who funds KAMUKAMA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds STANFORD HEALTH CARE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The San Francisco FoundationCA24.4× affinity12 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The San Francisco Foundation · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Marin Community Foundation · Jewish Community Federation of San Francisco the Peninsula Marin & Sonoma · Salesforce Foundation · Odell Rs & Hp Fund Tua-Main · Trust Funds Incorporated · The Carl Gellert and Celia Berta Gellert Foundation · Olympic Club Foundation · McNabb Foundation · The Intuit Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The O'Brien Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The O'Brien Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 89 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on O'Brien Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph