· Private foundation
The Nursey Foundation Inc
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2022–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k7 grants · $28k
- $10k–50k18 grants · $299k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $118k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| HONEY'S MINI THERAPY ADVENTURES | $60,000 |
| CHILDREN CANCER CENTER | $57,802 |
| Individual grant recipient | $25,000 |
| COMMUNITY FOOD PANTRY | $22,500 |
| INSPIRA TAMPA BAY INC | $20,000 |
| THE SKILLS CENTER | $20,000 |
| ST VINCENT DE PAUL | $20,000 |
| THE VOLUNTEER WAY | $20,000 |
| NATIONAL PEDIATRIC CENTER | $18,792 |
| MERCY FULL PROJECT | $17,225 |
| PROJECT FOCUS | $17,211 |
| SOAR FIRST INC | $15,000 |
| HOPEVILLE FAMILY MINISTRIES | $15,000 |
| COVE BEHAVIORAL HEALTH | $15,000 |
| MIND OVER MATTER OF HILLSBOROUGH | $15,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY22–24, $131k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 85% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +45% since the first grant, against +8% for the ones you funded once.
3 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 24 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 20% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $354k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CCCHILDREN'S CANCER CENTER INC3× · 2022–2024 · $264k · revenue +45%
- CFCOMMUNITY FOOD PANTRY3× · 2022–2024 · $67k
- RFREADY FOR LIFE INC3× · 2022–2024 · $43k · revenue +19%
Funded once
- TCTHE CENTRE FOR WOMEN INCone grant, 2022 · $35k · revenue +0%
- BBBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERSone grant, 2022 · $25k
- TBTHUNDER BAY VOLLEYBALL ACADEMY INCone grant, 2022 · $20k · revenue +11%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The florida center supports the healthy development of young children, specializing in those with delays, disabilities or mental health challenges. our mission- "to help build and foster strong families and expand the potential of young…
To cultivate financial resources dedicated to building stronger families and stronger communities through the operations and programs of families first. contributing to the foundation is an investment in a safe, healthy and sustainable…
The mission of the child protection center, inc. is the prevention, intervention and treatment of child abuse. we envision a community where children are safe from abuse and free to thrive. to successfully address the issue of child abuse,…
Project BUILD is a non-profit organization dedicated to empowering at risk youth and young adults to be responsible, productive members of their families and communities. Our mission is to make a positive impact through the efforts of a…
We inspire well-being & success in the lives of vulnerable children, youth & families through responsive quality programs and safe places. part iii - additional information family counseling parents and youth ages 6-17 can receive…
Help disadvantaged children through various programs including children in foster care, provides shoes to children in shelters and homeless children, help generate funds for children's causes in the tampa bay area, and assist with…
Families first of palm beach county, through innovative programs, promotes generational change by addressing families emotional, physical, and social well-being.
The mission of the arc tampa bay, inc. is to support and empower people with intellectual and developmental disabilities.
Bays provides counseling & guidance to the youth of florida and provides services necessary to aid troubled youth & their families. bays partners with individuals, families, and communities to inspire change, growth, & success.
To unlock the potential of at-risk children and families by providing compassionate and effective services that create opportunities for success.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Ready for Life Inc and the most unlike its peers is Mercy Full Project Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 16 years old; the field is 11. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 28% startups (under 5 years old) — 10% of your grantees by number, and just 4% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 4% lost their exemption, against 17% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 36 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds CHILDREN'S CANCER CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds HONEYS MINI THERAPY ADVENTURES INC ↗
- Who funds READY FOR LIFE INC ↗
- Who funds THE CENTRE FOR WOMEN INC ↗
- Who funds THUNDER BAY VOLLEYBALL ACADEMY INC ↗
- Who funds INSPIRA TAMPA BAY INC ↗
- Who funds THE VOLUNTEER WAY INC ↗
- Who funds THE SKILLS CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds Mercy Full Project Inc ↗
- Who funds PROJECT FOCUS INC ↗
- Who funds Cove Behavioral Health Inc ↗
- Who funds CELEBRATE BIRTHDAYS INC ↗
- Who funds DAWNING FAMILY SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL PEDIATRIC CANCER FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds FAMILY PROMISE OF HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds THE BREAST CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Madis Movement Inc ↗
- Who funds The Kind Mouse Productions Inc ↗
- Who funds FSS FOUNDATION INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Community Foundation of Tampa Bay Inc · Debartolo Family Foundation Inc · Rays Baseball Foundation Inc · The Florida Medical Clinic Foundation of Caring Inc · United Way Suncoast Inc · Suncoast Credit Union Foundation · Publix Super Markets Charities Inc · Vinik Family Foundation · Pinellas Community Foundation · Allegany Franciscan Ministries Inc · The Spurlino Foundation · Sbj Resch Family Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Nursey Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- The Centre for Women Inc — 6% of income from government
- The Kind Mouse Productions Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.