Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Norwood Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$20k
Granted FY2024still arriving
1
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Education$116kReligion$99kHealth$15kYouth Development$13kCrime & Legal$13kRecreation & Sports$5kHuman Services$3k
02FY2024 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$20,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$73k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MORAVIAN UNIVERSITY$20,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY23–23, $3k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%ASSISTANE LEAGUE OF KLAMATH BASIN: $3k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

VT
WA
IL
WI
OR
IA
PA
CA
MO
VA
MD
AZ
GA
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

45%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$119k · 4 repeat orgs$145k to everyone else

4 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
22

Total granted

$119k
$145k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+25%
+38%

Still filing today

75%
45%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’21’22’23’24
ReligionHealthHuman ServicesCrime & LegalRecreation & SportsEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SP
    SUGAR PINE CHRISTIAN CAMPS
    2× · 2017–2018 · $50k · revenue -26%
  • MU
    MORAVIAN UNIVERSITY
    2× · 2023–2024 · $43k · revenue +25%
  • BC
    BAY CREEK CHRISTIAN OUTREACH MINISTRIES INC
    2× · 2017–2018 · $14k

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $10k
  • LC
    LIVING CLASSROOMS FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2022 · $10k
  • BL
    BLACK LAKE BIBLE CAMPgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue +38%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Timberline Baptist Camp & Conference Center Inc

Christian retreat center

2
Intermountain Christian Camp

Icc changes lives and glorifies god by providing biblical teaching, christian discipling, and opportunities to experience christ. we provide a positive camp experience to study the word of god, build relationships and create opportunities…

Religion
3
Cedar Lake Ministries

Cedar lake ministries exist to provide a life changing environment for evangelism and spiritual growth.

4
Camp Pattersonville Inc

Children's Christian summer camp

Recreation & Sports
5
Arborbrook Christian Academy

Arborbrook Christian Academy partners with parents to equip, empower, and encourage students to cultivate godly character, pursue life-long learning, and love the Lord Jesus Christ.

Education
6
Camp Peniel Inc

Bring people to a 'face-to-face' relationship with god through christ-centured adventures.

Recreation & Sports
7
Lincoln Lake Baptist Youth Camp Inc

Lincoln lake exists as an outreach of the local church, using the unique atmosphere of camping to evangelize and disciple individuals through the word of god.

8
Board of Camp and Retreat Ministries Or/Id Conference United Methodist Church

See schedule o. we serve individuals, families, educational institutions, religiously affiliated groups, social service agencies, community service organizations, and other nonprofit organizations that enrich life in the world. we are a…

9
Lake Springfield Christian Assembly

To provide opportunities for people to encounter and grow in jesus christ, led by positive role models expressing god's love in a camping/retreat environment

Recreation & Sports
10
Camp Shalom Inc

Camp shalom is a christ-centered outdoor ministry: a time and place apart that encourages growth through relationships with god, community and nature.

Religion
11
Kids Across America

Christian sports camp to teach biblical principles and life skills to urban youth and their mentors.

Religion
12
Camp Selah

Christian camp for youth, families, and organizations.

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Sugar Pine Christian Camps and the most unlike its peers is Vox Invictus Mentoring. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 26 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/14
Grantees still filing
9/14
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

MORAVIAN UNIVERSITY — $42,700 · OtherMORAVIAN UNIVERSITYBAY CREEK CHRISTIAN OUTREACH MINISTRIES INC — $14,000 · OtherBAY CREEK CHRISTIAN OUTREACH MINISTRIES INCIndividual grant recipient — $10,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientLIVING CLASSROOMS FOUNDATION — $10,000 · OtherLIVING CLASSROOMS FOUNDATIONPOULTNEY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL — $10,000 · OtherPOULTNEY ELEMENTARY SCHOOLHARTLAND CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION — $10,000 · OtherHARTLAND CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATIONINTEGRAL YOUTH SERVICES — $9,737 · OtherINTEGRAL YOUTH SERVICESNEW HOPE CHRISTIAN SCHOOLS INC — $9,336 · OtherNEW HOPE CHRISTIAN SCHOOLS INCRAPPAHANNOCK AREA OFFICE YOUTH — $6,500 · OtherTRINITY LUTHERAN SCHOOL — $5,142 · OtherARROWHEAD MINISTRIES — $5,000 · OtherCAMP HEBRON INC — $5,000 · Other+5 more — $10,970 · Other+5 moreSUGAR PINE CHRISTIAN CAMPS — $49,895 · ReligionSUGAR PINE CHRISTIAN CAMPSBLACK LAKE BIBLE CAMP — $10,000 · ReligionBLACK LAKE BIBLE CAMPBARNABAS FOUNDATION INC — $10,000 · ReligionBARNABAS FOUNDATION INCMARYLAND THERAPEUTIC RIDING INC — $10,000 · HealthLighthouse Family Retreat Inc — $5,000 · HealthCHOOSING INTEGRITY — $12,500 · Crime & LegalHEIGHTS CHRISTIAN SCHOOLS — $10,000 · EducationCamp Daniel Inc — $5,000 · Recreation & SportsASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF KLAMATH BASIN — $3,000 · Human Services
Other$148,385Religion$69,895Health$15,000Crime & Legal$12,500Education$10,000Recreation & Sports$5,000Human Services$3,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetSUGAR PINE CHRISTIAN CAMPS — $49,895 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetMORAVIAN UNIVERSITY — $42,700 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCHOOSING INTEGRITY — $12,500 over 2y, 30% of budgetBLACK LAKE BIBLE CAMP — $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetHEIGHTS CHRISTIAN SCHOOLS — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBARNABAS FOUNDATION INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMARYLAND THERAPEUTIC RIDING INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetINTEGRAL YOUTH SERVICES — $9,737 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetNEW HOPE CHRISTIAN SCHOOLS INC — $9,336 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetCAMP HEBRON INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetLighthouse Family Retreat Inc — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCamp Daniel Inc — $5,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetVox Invictus Mentoring — $3,220 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF KLAMATH BASIN — $3,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust IncIN8.5× affinity5 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Norwood Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 30%2%8%17%30%your share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 29%
  • Integral Youth Services29% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Norwood Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to The Norwood Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 26 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph