Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Northern Cross Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$290k
Granted FY2025still arriving
11
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What it funds
0191% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$487kReligion$406kEducation$230kHuman Services$40kInternational$33kFood & Nutrition$32kEmployment$20kPublic Benefit$20kOther$0
02FY2025 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $12k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $129k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $150k
$20,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$1.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SOLT - SOCIETY OF OUR LADY$100,000
KENTWOOD COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$50,000
EQUEST CENTER FOR THERAPEUTIC RIDIN$32,775
ST JOHN VIANNEY CATHOLIC SCHOOL$25,000
THE CROSS MINISTRY GROUP$20,000
BEYOND 26$20,000
INTERNATIONAL PROMISE FOUNDATION$16,000
SEWARD CHILD CARE CENTER$15,000
ND ROCKNE ATHLETICS FUND$7,500
SYLVIAS PLACE$2,000
4 ONE 2 CARES$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

US giving: 79% of grant dollars ($1.1M). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 21% that went abroad ($282k) is mapped below.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY25–25, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%SYLVIAS PLACE: $2k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Beyond the US: 21% of all-years giving ($282k)

1 country, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
Belize$282k · 3 grants
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

66%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.1M · 10 repeat orgs$548k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +76% since the first grant, against +27% for those funded once.

10 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
19

Total granted

$1.1M
$376k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+76%
+27%

Still filing today

50%
16%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 29% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $172k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesInternationalRecreation & SportsEmploymentReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • EC
    Equest Center for Therapeutic Riding Inc
    7× · 2017–2025 · $490k · revenue +142% · 30% of their budget
  • IP
    INTERNATIONAL PROMISE FOUNDATION
    5× · 2017–2025 · $49k · revenue +2%
  • B2
    BEYOND 26 INC
    2× · 2021–2025 · $40k · revenue +76%

Funded once

  • SO
    SOCIETY OF OUR LADY
    one grant, 2024 · $150k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2019 · $58k
  • Y
    YMCA
    one grant, 2018 · $40k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Safe Haven Counseling Associates in

Biblical counseling

—
2
Life Center for Spiritual Growth

Please see schedule o for description

Human Services
3
Childd Ministry

Meeting with special needs families, provide training to teachers in order to advise and consult special needs families, conduct meetings to discuss organizational needs and training to expand ministry and reach. Provide content and…

Education
4
Kingdom Rock Childrens Village

The mission of Kingdom Rock Children's Village is to provide a quality education in a warm and loving environment, based on the teaching and examples of Jesus Christ. We seek to nurture and develop each child?s educational, social,…

Education
5
Salt Ministries

A ministry without walls, based in West Michigan, Salt Ministries offers friendship, pastoral care and counseling, preaching, teaching and music for people with special needs or problems. Salt also has relationships with persons or…

—
6
Freedom in Faith Ministries Inc

We are a team with the shared passion of seeing others walk in spiritual freedom and living out the identity they have in christ jesus.

Religion
7
Pregnancy Choices of Skagit County

Pregnancy Choices is a Christian ministry caring for those touched by unplanned pregnancy by providing options and resources that promote life.

Health
8
The Liberty Center Inc

To help individuals, couples and families to identify and resolve personal and spiritual issues through the teachings of Jesus Christ in the Scriptures. We teach, train, counsel and produce resources to accomplish this purpose.

Religion
9
Selah International Counseling Ministries

The mission of Selah International Counseling Ministries is to glorify God as we serve and equip His church, providing leadership and service through counseling, counseling resources, and counseling training.

Health
10
Fields of Grace Ministries Inc

We exist to provide a safe retreat for hurting women to experience the healing love of Jesus Christ. Our rural flower farm is a safe and unhindered environment that is able to provide a therapeutic setting for women who have endured trauma.

Health
11
Love Inc of South Kent County

We exist to mobilize churches to transform lives in the name of Christ. Love INC equips, trains, organizes and mobilizes local churches.

Religion
12
The Promise Center

Tell the community at large the message of the lord jesus christ

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Grace Adventures Ministries; the most unlike its peers is Kentwood Community Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 37 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
8/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

AMBERGRIS CAYE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: $224,125 · OtherAMBERGRIS CAYE ELEMENTARY SCHOOLOUR SHEPHERDS OUR FUTURE: $200,000 · OtherOUR SHEPHERDS OUR FUTURESOCIETY OF OUR LADY: $150,000 · OtherSOCIETY OF OUR LADYSOLT - SOCIETY OF OUR LADY: $100,000 · OtherSOLT - SOCIETY OF OUR LADYIndividual grant recipient: $58,200 · OtherIndividual grant recipientYMCA: $40,000 · Other+23 more: $204,829 · Other+23 moreEquest Center for Therapeutic Riding Inc: $490,130 · HealthEquest Center for Therapeutic Rid…+1 more: $1,500 · HealthKENTWOOD COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $50,000 · PhilanthropyINTERNATIONAL PROMISE FOUNDATION: $48,545 · InternationalBEYOND 26 INC: $40,000 · EmploymentKIDS' FOOD BASKET INC: $27,500 · Food & NutritionVOLUNTEERS IN SERVICE: $25,000 · Human ServicesSYLVIA'S PLACE: $2,000 · Human Services
Other$977,154Health$491,630Philanthropy$50,000International$48,545Employment$40,000Food & Nutrition$27,500Human Services$27,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetEquest Center for Therapeutic Riding Inc: $490,130 over 7y, 30% of budgetKENTWOOD COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $50,000 over 1y, 29% of budgetINTERNATIONAL PROMISE FOUNDATION: $48,545 over 5y, 3.3% of budgetBEYOND 26 INC: $40,000 over 2y, 8.4% of budgetKIDS' FOOD BASKET INC: $27,500 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetVOLUNTEERS IN SERVICE: $25,000 over 1y, 9.6% of budgetThe Cross Ministry Group: $20,000 over 1y, 4.1% of budgetSYLVIA'S PLACE: $2,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetGRACE ADVENTURES: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSTARLIGHT MINISTRIES INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetPregnancy Resource Center: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Equest Center for Therapeutic Riding Inc ↗
  • Who funds KENTWOOD COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL PROMISE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BEYOND 26 INC ↗
  • Who funds KIDS' FOOD BASKET INC ↗
  • Who funds VOLUNTEERS IN SERVICE ↗
  • Who funds The Cross Ministry Group ↗
  • Who funds Seward Child Care Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds SYLVIA'S PLACE ↗
  • Who funds GRACE ADVENTURES ↗
  • Who funds STARLIGHT MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds Pregnancy Resource Center ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Peter C & Emajean Cook FoundationMI15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Peter C & Emajean Cook Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Northern Cross Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Northern Cross Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Northern Cross Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Northern Cross Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 37 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Northern Cross’ filings →

    More from the funding graph