Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Norman and Joan Ciment Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$200k
Granted FY2024still arriving
24
Grants FY2024still arriving
6
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What it funds
0180% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

International$656kEducation$440kReligion$162kPhilanthropy$85kHuman Services$29kHealth$13kPublic Safety & Disaster$2kArts & Culture$200Other$0
02FY2024 · 24 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k20 grants · $20k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $80k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $100k
$1,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$4.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
AMIT CHILDREN$100,000
Individual grant recipient$40,000
OHR CAMPUS$30,000
LEVENTHAL FOUNDATION$10,000
CHABAD OF SOUTH BROWARD$5,000
YOUNG ISRAEL OF HOLLYWOOD$3,600
GREATER MIAMI JEWISH FEDERATION$2,600
HATZALAH$2,000
CARRIAGE CLUB SOUTH SHUL$1,925
SHUL OF BAL HARBOUR$1,500
Individual grant recipient$1,200
BIKUR CHOLIM$1,000
Individual grant recipient$225
TUNNEL TO TOWERS$200
BAMBI INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION$100
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–23, $450) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%MATANAH B'SESSER OF SOUTH FLORIDA: $350 → 15%Matanah B'Sesser of South Florida: $100 → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
MI
NY
OH
PA
NJ
CA
VA
MD
AZ
TN
DC
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

58%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$938k · 38 repeat orgs$685k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +51% since the first grant, against +44% for those funded once.

38 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2024, 28 since wound down; 13 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

38
61

Total granted

$938k
$567k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+51%
+44%

Still filing today

34%
21%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 40% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $119k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthEducationReligionInternationalPhilanthropyFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • KY
    KATZ YESHIVA HIGH SCHOOL OF SOUTH FLORIDA INC
    5× · 2018–2022 · $90k · revenue +56%
  • YU
    YESHIVA UNIVERSITY
    2× · 2017–2018 · $41k · revenue +39%
  • KH
    KATZ HILLEL DAY SCHOOL OF BOCA RATON INC
    3× · 2017–2019 · $30k · revenue +99%

Funded once

  • JC
    Jerusalem College of Technolog
    one grant, 2022 · $150k
  • TA
    TEL AVIV UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2021 · $125k
  • GT
    GIRLS TOWN JERUSALEM
    one grant, 2022 · $100k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Yeshiva Ohr Yisroel
Philanthropy
2
Sherit Isroel
—
3
University of Judaism Foundation
—
4
Zichron Avrohom Yosef
Philanthropy
5
Tal Hashamayim Foundation
Religion
6
American Friends of Yeshiva Aish Hatorah
—
7
Ohel Yakov Foundation
—
8
Yad Yosef Foundation
Philanthropy
9
Rabbi Isaac Elchanan Theological Seminary

To prepare students for the rabbinate and to issue the traditional certificate of ordination in connection therewith. the seminary is authorized to confer the degree of master of hebrew literature (m.h.l.), doctor of hebrew literature…

Education
10
Bais Yisrael Foundation
—
11
Jewish Life Foundation
—
12
Hillel At Florida International University

Enrich the lives of jewish students

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Pef Israel Endowment Funds Inc; the most unlike its peers is Jay Morton-Levinthal Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

33 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 33 of the 115 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
33/33
Grantees still filing
24/33
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Hebrew Day School: $186,250 · OtherHebrew Day SchoolJerusalem College of Technolog: $150,000 · OtherJerusalem College of TechnologTEL AVIV UNIVERSITY: $125,000 · OtherTEL AVIV UNIVERSITYGIRLS TOWN JERUSALEM: $100,000 · OtherGIRLS TOWN JERUSALEMAMIT: $76,760 · OtherAMITIndividual grant recipient: $70,125 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $50,000 · Other+80 more: $387,677 · Other+80 moreKATZ YESHIVA HIGH SCHOOL OF SOUTH FLORIDA INC: $90,000 · EducationKATZ YESHIV…YESHIVA UNIVERSITY: $40,500 · EducationYESHIVA UNI…KATZ HILLEL DAY SCHOOL OF BOCA RATON INC: $30,000 · EducationKATZ HILLEL…+2 more: $5,305 · EducationOhr on Campus Inc: $87,600 · ReligionOne For Israel: $17,800 · Religion+3 more: $5,200 · ReligionAMIT CHILDREN INC: $100,000 · InternationalKOL HANEARIM INC: $5,000 · International+2 more: $1,100 · InternationalJay Morton-Levinthal Foundation Inc: $81,500 · PhilanthropyGREATER MIAMI JEWISH FEDERATION INC: $3,136 · PhilanthropyPEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC: $3,000 · Philanthropy+3 more: $825 · PhilanthropySharsheret Inc: $10,218 · HealthMt Sinai Health Care Foundation: $1,000 · HealthAmerican Heart Association Inc: $966 · HealthCHAI LIFELINE INC: $500 · Health+3 more: $225 · HealthMATANAH BSESSER OF SOUTH FLORIDA I: $450 · Human Services
Other$1,145,812Education$165,805Religion$110,600International$106,100Philanthropy$88,461Health$12,909Human Services$450

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAMIT CHILDREN INC: $100,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetKATZ YESHIVA HIGH SCHOOL OF SOUTH FLORIDA INC: $90,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetOhr on Campus Inc: $87,600 over 5y, 78% of budgetJay Morton-Levinthal Foundation Inc: $81,500 over 3y, 42% of budgetYESHIVA UNIVERSITY: $40,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetKATZ HILLEL DAY SCHOOL OF BOCA RATON INC: $30,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetOne For Israel: $17,800 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSharsheret Inc: $10,218 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetKOL HANEARIM INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetFRIENDS OF CANFIELD: $5,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF NEVEH ZION: $3,600 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetGREATER MIAMI JEWISH FEDERATION INC: $3,136 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetPEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHILLEL THE FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMPUS LIFE: $1,100 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMt Sinai Health Care Foundation: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $966 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCentral Fund of Israel: $850 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBAMBI INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION INC: $600 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetYehudi Inc: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHAI LIFELINE INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMATANAH BSESSER OF SOUTH FLORIDA I: $450 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $305 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetYESHIVA HAR TORAH: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee Inc: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMIAMI NEW DRAMA: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED WAY MIAMI INC: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHELPING HANDS NETWORK INC: $180 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE HERALD CHARITIES INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF YAD SARAH INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHEBRON FUND INC: $25 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $25 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds AMIT CHILDREN INC ↗
  • Who funds KATZ YESHIVA HIGH SCHOOL OF SOUTH FLORIDA INC ↗
  • Who funds Ohr on Campus Inc ↗
  • Who funds Jay Morton-Levinthal Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds YESHIVA UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds KATZ HILLEL DAY SCHOOL OF BOCA RATON INC ↗
  • Who funds One For Israel ↗
  • Who funds Sharsheret Inc ↗
  • Who funds KOL HANEARIM INC ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF CANFIELD ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Communal FundNY20.4× affinity12 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Communal Fund · The Russell & Ronalee Galbut Family Foundation Inc · Greater Miami Jewish Federation Inc · The Ojc Fund · Daniels Family Foundation Fka the Ronald L Daniels & June E Daniels Fndn · The Diesel Foundation Inc · United Jewish Community of Broward County Inc · Zichron Chaim Charity Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · Mightycause Charitable Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Endowment Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Norman and Joan Ciment Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Norman and Joan Ciment Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 60%6%23%51%90%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →median 4%
  • United Way Miami Inc: 23% of income from government
  • Sharsheret Inc: 4% of income from government
  • Yehudi Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Helping Hands Food Ko Op Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
6get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 115 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Norman and Joan Ciment’s filings →

More from the funding graph