· Private foundation
Daniels Family Foundation Fka the Ronald L Daniels & June E Daniels Fndn
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 60% of DANIELS FAMILY FOUNDATION FKA THE RONALD L DANIELS & JUNE E DANIELS FNDN’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k27 grants · $58k
- $10k–50k9 grants · $144k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $63k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| TALMUDIC UNIVERSITY | $62,520 |
| WATERBURY COMMUNITY MESIVTA INC | $26,000 |
| UNION OF ORTHODOX JEWISH CONGREGATIONS OF AMERICA | $24,000 |
| CENTRAL FUND FOR ISRAEL | $18,000 |
| UNITED HATZALAH | $18,000 |
| ISRAEL SELECT CHARITY FUND | $14,400 |
| FOOD BANK OF IOWA | $13,000 |
| CONGREGATION OHR CHAIM | $10,500 |
| YAD YISROEL | $10,000 |
| CONGREGATION OF BEIS EPHRAIM | $10,000 |
| HATZALAH SOUTH FLORIDA | $9,000 |
| MAYO CLINIC | $6,250 |
| IMAGINATION PRODUCTIONS INC | $6,000 |
| CHINUCH YEHUDI | $5,000 |
| SHE'ARIM USA CHARITABLE TRUST | $4,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY21–24, $19k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 97% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +45% since the first grant, against +17% for the ones you funded once.
62 repeat relationships — 24 still active in FY2024, 38 since wound down; 12 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 87% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $34k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- FOFRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC7× · 2017–2024 · $461k · revenue +383%
- YYYAD YISROEL4× · 2017–2020 · $80k · revenue +15%
- CYChinuch Yehudi Inc8× · 2017–2024 · $54k · revenue +599%
Funded once
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2017 · $34k
- OIONE ISRAEL FUNDDARASHTI KIRVAone grant, 2022 · $19k
- APASHIRA PROGRAM INCgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $16k · revenue +108%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To further jewish education in israel
Religious School
To promote, benefit, and support Jewish religious, charitable & educational activities in Israel and the USA.
Furtherance of jewish education
To support religious, charitable, scientific, literary and/or educational programs
To promote and support jewish religious charitable and educational activities in israel & usa.
To voluntarily assist the house of religious learning known as yeshiva neveh zion in israel
Raise funds for religious and educational institutions in the state of israel, and to provide educational and social improvement for the children of kiryat arba, israel.
The organization provides financial assistance to victims of acts of terrorism in the state of israel.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Opendor Media Inc and the most unlike its peers is The Wurtman Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 18 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 10% of your grantees by number, and just 5% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 4% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
52 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 52 of the 134 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds FRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC ↗
- Who funds YAD YISROEL ↗
- Who funds Chinuch Yehudi Inc ↗
- Who funds Central Fund of Israel ↗
- Who funds FOOD BANK OF IOWA ↗
- Who funds MAYO CLINIC ↗
- Who funds OPENDOR MEDIA INC ↗
- Who funds IYUN HAPARSHA INC ↗
- Who funds YESHIVA OF MIAMI INC ↗
- Who funds HATZALAH SOUTH FLORIDA EMERGENCY MEDCIAL SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds Yehudi Inc ↗
- Who funds ASHIRA PROGRAM INC ↗
- Who funds Israel Select Charity Fund Inc ↗
- Who funds THE SHEARIM USA CHARITABLE TRUST ↗
- Who funds TORAH LIVE INC ↗
- Who funds Holocaust Heroes Worldwide ↗
- Who funds HONESTREPORTINGCOM INC ↗
- Who funds AVIV HA TORAH ↗
- Who funds Bais Yaakov of Waterbury Inc ↗
- Who funds GREATER MIAMI JEWISH FEDERATION INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Jewish Communal Fund · The Ojc Fund · Associated Jewish Charities of Baltimore · Jack Adjmi Family Foundation Inc · The Sorala Foundation · Jewish Federation of Metropolitan Chicago · Alice G Hanson Family Foundation · Gertrude and Morris Bienenfeld Charitable Foundation · The Russell & Ronalee Galbut Family Foundation Inc · Mayberg Foundation Inc · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Jewish Community Foundation of San Diego
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Daniels Family Foundation Fka the Ronald L Daniels & June E Daniels Fndn funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Bais Yaakov of Waterbury Inc — 4% of income from government
- Jewish Community Services of South Florida Inc — 1% of income from government
- Yehudi Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.