· Private foundation
The Diesel Foundation Inc
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2022–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k106 grants · $147k
- $10k–50k8 grants · $146k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $170k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Individual grant recipient | $94,725 |
| NORTH MIAMI BEACH KOLLEL | $75,500 |
| MOSDOS HADRAS YERUSHALAYIM | $42,018 |
| SEPHARDIC LEBANESE CONGREGATION | $20,494 |
| TORAS EMES ACADEMY OF MIAMI | $18,360 |
| CONGREGATION OUR BOYZ INC | $15,500 |
| MATANAH BSESSER OF SOUTH FLORIDA | $15,200 |
| BETH MEDRASH GOVOHA OF AMERICA | $14,900 |
| CHABAD LUBAVITCH OF SOUTHWEST BROWARD INC | $10,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $10,000 |
| OHR HACHINUCH | $6,500 |
| CHAI LIFELINE | $6,050 |
| EDMOND J SFRA SYNAGOGUE INC | $6,000 |
| VARIOUS AMOUNTS GRANTED TO INDIVIDU | $5,398 |
| TOMCHEI SHABBOS OF LAKEWOOD | $5,250 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY22–24, $99k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 97% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +7% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.
37 repeat relationships — 33 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 82 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 58% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $196k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- OHOHR HACHINUCH INC3× · 2022–2024 · $26k · revenue +179%
- KHKEREN HATZEDAKA INC3× · 2022–2024 · $17k · revenue +6%
- TSTOMCHEI SHABBOS OF FLORIDA2× · 2022–2024 · $16k · revenue +105%
Funded once
- VCVARIOUS CHARITIES 5000one grant, 2022 · $193k
- CMCONGREGATION MINCHAS YEHUDAone grant, 2022 · $123k
- CMCONGREGATION MORDYS SHTIEBEL INCone grant, 2022 · $46k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Religious Teaching
Religious School
encourage and facilitate the observance of traditional orthodox Jewish practices around the world.
Ohr Yisrael is a religious institution that provides religious services and instruction to Rabbis and community members.
To operate a religious school for high school and post high school students.
Support of religious schools in Israel
Yeshiva chayei olam inc., was established for the purpose of having an orthodox jewish high school. the school teaches talumdic studies, talmudic jurasprudence, orthodox jewish ethics and the old testament. in addition, the school provides…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Yeshivah Beth Israel Tifereth Menachem Foundation and the most unlike its peers is American Friends of Torat Eliyahu. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 12 years old; the field is 16. You back the younger end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 15% of your grantees by number, and just 5% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.8% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
72 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 72 of the 232 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds MATANAH BSESSER OF SOUTH FLORIDA I ↗
- Who funds KOLLEL CHAZON ISH ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF NEVEH ZION ↗
- Who funds TORAS EMES ACADEMY OF MIAMI INC ↗
- Who funds OHR HACHINUCH INC ↗
- Who funds HELPING OUT PEOPLE EVERDAY CORP ↗
- Who funds KEREN HATZEDAKA INC ↗
- Who funds TOMCHEI SHABBOS OF FLORIDA ↗
- Who funds Bonei Olam Inc ↗
- Who funds Yehudi Inc ↗
- Who funds CHAI LIFELINE INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Jack Adjmi Family Foundation Inc · The Ojc Fund · Jewish Communal Fund · The Adjmi-Dwek Foundation Inc · The Jmg Foundation · The Jimmy and Berta Khezrie Charitable Foundation · The Setton Foundation · The Zev and Susan Munk Family Foundation · Mary & Abe Sutton Foundation · The Howard Hoffman & Sons Foundation Inc · Ralph J Harary Foundation Inc · Chehebar Family Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Diesel Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Bet Yaakov of the Jersey Shore Inc — 9% of income from government
- Yeshiva Keter Torah Inc — 8% of income from government
- Yehudi Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to The Diesel Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to The Diesel Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.