Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Nolen Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$446k
Granted FY2025still arriving
17
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$170k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Religion$1.5MHuman Services$1.3MInternational$275kEducation$84kHealth$56kCrime & Legal$45kFood & Nutrition$24kYouth Development$5kOther$0
02FY2025 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k10 grants · $46k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $130k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $270k
$5,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$1.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ASBURY UNITED METHODIST CHURCH$170,000
URBAN MINISTRIES$100,000
EMBRACE ALABAMA KIDS$45,000
SOZO CHILDREN$40,000
BIG OAK RANCH$25,000
COMMUNITY OF HOPE HEALTH CLINIC$10,000
UMCOR$10,000
BOY'S & GIRL'S CLUB OF CENTRAL ALABAMA$5,750
CRISIS CENTER INC$5,000
SHEPHERD'S FOLD$5,000
THE FOUNDRY MINISTRIES$5,000
JIMMIE HALE MISSION$5,000
TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION$5,000
CORNERSTONE SCHOOLS$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $1.3M) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%BIG OAK RANCH: $25k → 13%EMBRACE ALABAMA KIDS: $45k → 18%BIG OAK RANCH: $25k → 13%EMBRACE ALABAMA KIDS: $45k → 18%BIG OAK RANCH: $25k → 13%EMBRACE ALABAMA KIDS: $45k → 18%BIG OAK RANCH: $25k → 13%EMBRACE ALABAMA KIDS: $45k → 18%BIG OAK RANCH: $25k → 13%UNITED METHODIST CHILDREN'S HOME: $40k → 18%BIG OAK RANCH: $25k → 13%UNITED METHODIST CHILDREN'S HOME: $40k → 18%BIG OAK RANCH: $25k → 13%UNITED METHODIST CHILDREN'S HOME: $40k → 18%BIG OAK RANCH: $25k → 13%EMBRACE ALABAMA KIDS: $40k → 18%BIG OAK RANCH: $25k → 13%UNITED METHODIST CHILDREN'S HOME: $35k → 18%URBAN MINISTRY: $100k → 16%URBAN MINISTRY: $100k → 16%URBAN MINISTRY: $100k → 16%URBAN MINISTRY: $100k → 16%URBAN MINISTRY: $75k → 16%URBAN MINISTRY: $50k → 16%THE FOUNDRY MINISTRIES: $5k → 16%URBAN MINISTRY: $50k → 16%THE FOUNDRY MINISTRIES: $5k → 16%URBAN MINISTRY: $40k → 16%THE FOUNDRY MINISTRIES: $5k → 16%CHILDREN'S VILLAGE INC: $5k → 16%THE FOUNDRY MINISTRIES: $5k → 16%CHILDREN'S VILLAGE INC: $5k → 16%THE FOUNDRY MINISTRIES: $5k → 16%CHILDREN'S VILLAGE INC: $5k → 16%THE FOUNDRY MINISTRIES: $5k → 16%CHILDREN'S VILLAGE INC: $5k → 16%THE FOUNDRY MINISTRIES: $5k → 16%CHILDREN'S VILLAGE INC: $5k → 16%THE FOUNDRY MINISTRIES: $5k → 16%CHILDREN'S VILLAGE INC: $2k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.7M · 22 repeat orgs$141k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +31% since the first grant, against +24% for those funded once.

22 repeat relationships: 14 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

22
9

Total granted

$3.7M
$31k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+31%
+24%

Still filing today

73%
44%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 75% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $111k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesReligionEducationHealthInternationalHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UM
    UNITED METHODIST CHILDREN'S HOME
    9× · 2017–2025 · $375k · revenue +13%
  • SC
    SOZO CHILDREN INTERNATIONAL
    9× · 2017–2025 · $315k · revenue +80%
  • BO
    BIG OAK RANCH INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $225k · revenue +135%

Funded once

  • LC
    LIFELINE CHILDREN'S SERVICES INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $5k · revenue +159%
  • SF
    SUKI FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2024 · $5k
  • UNITED WAY OF CENTRAL ALABAMA INC
    one grant, 2020 · $5k · revenue +21%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Christian Services for Children in Alabama

The mission of christian services for children in alabama is to show the love of christ by providing counseling and other related services to children and their families.

—
2
United Methodist Children's Home

To provide quality compassionate behavioral healthcare services to children and families of arkansas through a comprehensive continuum of programs which include residential treatment center care, therapeutic group home care, emergency…

Human Services
3
Agape of Central Alabama Inc

As a ministry of jesus christ, agape's mission is that vulnerable and orphaned children find permanency in safe, nurturing families.

Human Services
4
Southern Christian Services for Children and Youth Inc

To provide residential care for children and youth, therapeutic programs, adoption and foster care, independent living skills and transitional living services.

Human Services
5
Church of God Children's Home of North Carolina Inc

To provide a positive and safe living environment for hurting, abused, neglected and at-risk children placed privately and by the north carolina department of social services

Human Services
6
African Children's Mission Inc

Reaching out to children in east africa living in destitute circumstances, both physically and with the gospel of jesus christ, to enable them to grow and develop in a secure environment.

Religion
7
Child Advocacy Center of Cullman Inc

Nurturing hope, encouraging health, and promoting healing in troubled families through community collaboration, communication and cooperation

Human Services
8
Methodist Children's Home

Methodist children's home equips children, youth, and families to flourish by offering hope through christian-centered relationships, services, and support.

Human Services
9
Streetlife Ministries

Street life ministries organizes local churches, civic groups, private individuals and other interested parties to serve the local homeless and impoverished population by providing meals and ad hoc counseling to urge them toward resources…

Religion
10
Collins Home Family Ministries

Collins family ministries, inc. exists to embody the love of christ by providing compassion to families, children, and at-risk youth who are experiencing hardship. we provide shelter for children, strength to families, and stability to our…

—
11
Challenge Ministries Us

The organization exists to spread the gospel of Jesus Christ while providing support and serving the poor through benevolent assistance, medical services, education, orphan care, church planting, etc.

International
12
United Community Ministries Inc

Providing food & shelter to the homeless and transitioning the homeless toward permanent independence in housing.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Lifeline Children's Services Inc; the most unlike its peers is Alturas Ministries Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 34 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/20
Grantees still filing
14/20
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ASBURY UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $1,650,000 · OtherASBURY UNITED METHODIST CHURCHURBAN MINISTRIES INC: $100,000 · Other+17 more: $274,400 · Other+17 moreUrban Ministry Inc: $615,000 · Human ServicesUrban Ministry IncUNITED METHODIST CHILDREN'S HOME: $375,000 · Human ServicesUNITED METHODIST CHILDREN'S HOMEBIG OAK RANCH INC: $225,000 · Human ServicesBIG OAK RANCH INC+3 more: $97,000 · Human Services+3 moreSOZO CHILDREN INTERNATIONAL: $314,500 · InternationalSOZO CHIL…COMMUNITY OF HOPE HEALTH CLINIC: $45,000 · HealthSMILE-A-MILE: $5,000 · HealthFOUNDATIONS EARLY LEARNING AND FAMILY CENTER INC: $36,000 · EducationSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $13,000 · EducationDOWNTOWN JIMMIE HALE MISSION: $29,000 · Housing & ShelterALTURAS MINISTRIES INC: $10,750 · ReligionLIFELINE CHILDREN'S SERVICES INC: $5,000 · ReligionALTRUA MINISTRIES INC: $2,000 · Religion
Other$2,024,400Human Services$1,312,000International$314,500Health$50,000Education$49,000Housing & Shelter$29,000Religion$17,750

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUrban Ministry Inc: $615,000 over 8y, 14% of budgetUNITED METHODIST CHILDREN'S HOME: $375,000 over 9y, 0.8% of budgetSOZO CHILDREN INTERNATIONAL: $314,500 over 9y, 1.5% of budgetBIG OAK RANCH INC: $225,000 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetCRISIS CENTER INC: $45,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMUNITY OF HOPE HEALTH CLINIC: $45,000 over 6y, 2.9% of budgetMountain Child Advocacy Center Inc: $40,000 over 4y, 1.8% of budgetTHE FOUNDRY MINISTRIES INC: $40,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetFOUNDATIONS EARLY LEARNING AND FAMILY CENTER INC: $36,000 over 6y, 1.4% of budgetURBAN PURPOSE INC: $30,000 over 5y, 3.3% of budgetDOWNTOWN JIMMIE HALE MISSION: $29,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetCHILDREN'S VILLAGE INC: $27,000 over 6y, 0.9% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $13,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF CENTRAL ALABAMA INC: $11,150 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetALTURAS MINISTRIES INC: $10,750 over 3y, 1.8% of budgetSHEPHERDS FOLD INC: $10,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetLIFELINE CHILDREN'S SERVICES INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUNITED WAY OF CENTRAL ALABAMA INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSMILE-A-MILE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetALTRUA MINISTRIES INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Urban Ministry Inc ↗
  • Who funds UNITED METHODIST CHILDREN'S HOME ↗
  • Who funds SOZO CHILDREN INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds BIG OAK RANCH INC ↗
  • Who funds CRISIS CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY OF HOPE HEALTH CLINIC ↗
  • Who funds Mountain Child Advocacy Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE FOUNDRY MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds FOUNDATIONS EARLY LEARNING AND FAMILY CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds URBAN PURPOSE INC ↗
  • Who funds DOWNTOWN JIMMIE HALE MISSION ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S VILLAGE INC ↗
  • Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF CENTRAL ALABAMA INC ↗
  • Who funds ALTURAS MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds SHEPHERDS FOLD INC ↗
  • Who funds LIFELINE CHILDREN'S SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF CENTRAL ALABAMA INC ↗
  • Who funds SMILE-A-MILE ↗
  • Who funds ALTRUA MINISTRIES INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Community Foundation of Greater BirminghamAL29.5× affinity12 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Community Foundation of Greater Birmingham · The Daniel Foundation of Alabama · Alabama Power Foundation Inc · Orlean & Ralph W Beeson Fund · Protective Life Foundation · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · Community Partnership of Alabama Inc · Robert R Meyer Foundation · United Way of Central Alabama Inc · Walker Area Community Foundation Inc · Mike and Gillian Goodrich Foundation · Community Food Bank of Central Alabama

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Nolen Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Nolen Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 34 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Nolen Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph