Loading…
Loading…
· Public charity
To strengthen the local food system by supporting new mexico's agricultural producers and creating strong networks for a healthier state.
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2018–2020.
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2020
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–20, $27k) land where the poverty rate runs at 18% — the area typically sits at 15%. 44% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Funding to local impact partners as part of the organization's multi-year community plan focused on achieving outcomes in the four specific areas determined to be essential in improving people's lives and strengthening our community: 1)…
To strengthen our local food system to support a healthy and resilient north coast community.
Alianza Agri-Cultura de Taos (AA-CT) is working to restore and revitalize the agricultural fabric of Taos County, a formerly agrarian community in Northern New Mexico. We see agriculture as a convergence point, where culture, economy,…
Supporting the university of new mexico as the source of innovation management, patent prosecution and licensing of technologies developed at the university of new mexico.
The mission is to reconnect sustainable food and natural medicine practices to the community through the development of community land providing edible and medicinal gardens, organic farm to table food, education and regenerative land…
Educate the public on forest conservation issues in New Mexico
The food depot strives to end hunger in northern new mexico. the food depot collects food from national, state and local sources and provides these donations to hungry new mexicans through more than 76 partner agencies in nine counties.
To provide and equip an underserved and underprivileged population, living in a federal food desert, with many of the necessary elements that make up the social determinants of healt. (food, education, housing, childcare, security,…
Educating the public about eating healthy, locally grown/produced food; engaging low-income and limited resource individuals/families to educate, inform and encourage them about healthy locally grown food and to encourage them to eat…
Our mission is to grow a healthy local community by improving access to, education about and advocacy for affordable nutrient dense foods with children's teaching gardens, our farmers market, producer education and community outreach.
Puente promotes the cultivation and consumption of amaranth, combined with other traditional and strategic crops, to encourage the diversification of local agriculture and diet for rural communities in Mexico and improve community…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is La Semilla Food Center and the most unlike its peers is Santa Fe Community Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Santa Fe Community Foundation · New Mexico Community Foundation · Con Alma Health Foundation Inc · Albuquerque Community Foundation · Marshall L and Perrine D McCune · WK Kellogg Foundation · New Mexico Fund for Women and Girls · Los Alamos National Laboratory · Paso del Norte Community Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Every dot is one organisation THE NEW MEXICO FARMERS MARKETING funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Through Plinth
This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: BLACK HEALTH NEW MEXICO.
Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk
~11 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 5 filed years.
5 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up 2.6× since.
US 501(c)(3); EIN 824558762 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.
Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.
OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.
Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.
Live · Plinth’s real DD engine
Run the actual assessment on BLACK HEALTH NEW MEXICO, cold from public data.
Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.
Post-award monitoring · continuous checks
What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.
Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro
Find your warmest path to The New Mexico Farmers Marketing through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.
Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.