Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Neal and Sherrie Savage Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$306k
Granted FY2023
26
Grants FY2023
8
States reached
$50k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

98% of Neal and Sherrie Savage Family Foundation’s FY2024 grant dollars went to Dechomai Asset Trust, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2024 names 18 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2023, the last year Neal and Sherrie Savage Family Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 17 organizations, $306k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

10
17
3
18
8
19
3
20
9
21
22
22
17
23
18
24

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What you fund
0197% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Philanthropy$19MEducation$1.1MHealth$209kInternational$74kReligion$60kYouth Development$40kHousing & Shelter$25kHuman Services$22kOther$0
02FY2023 · 26 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2023

  • Under $10k13 grants · $64k
  • $10k–50k11 grants · $143k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $100k
$10,000
Median grant
8
States reached
$233k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UTAH VALLEY UNIVERSITY$50,000
UTAH VALLEY UNIVERSITY$50,000
UNIVERSITY OF UTAH$25,000
UTAH VALLEY UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC$20,000
Fox Hollow Elementary School$15,000
WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY$12,500
ALZHEIMERS DISEASE AND RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATI$10,000
MIDDLE EAST CHILDRENS ALLIANCE$10,000
LOVELOUD FOUNDATION$10,000
UTAH VALLEY UNIVERSITY$10,000
GIVE HOPE GUATEMALA EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC$10,000
OTHER SIDE ACADEMY$10,000
Polaris High School$10,000
WEBER STATE UNIVERSITY$8,000
UTAH VALLEY UNIVERSITY$7,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $69k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 15% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%EMBRACE OF CELEBRATION INC: $10k → 13%STAND WITH UKRAINE: $4k → 6%BLESSING IN A BACKPACK: $500 → 15%GIVE HOPE GUATEMALA EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $2k → 8%GIVE HOPE GUATEMALA EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $10k → 8%GIVE HOPE GUATEMALA EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $10k → 8%GIVE HOPE GUATEMALA EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $10k → 8%THE INN BETWEEN: $2k → 8%CITIES STRONG FOUNDATION: $10k → 8%GIVE HOPE GUATEMALA EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $10k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

VT
IL
NY
CA
UT
CO
KY
WV
VA
AZ
DC
HI
OK
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.4M · 32 repeat orgs$215k to everyone else

32 repeat relationships — 13 still active in FY2023, 19 since wound down; 14 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call). Read against FY2023, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

32
29

Total granted

$1.4M
$67k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+11%
+31%

Still filing today

50%
62%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 85% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $69k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthEducationHuman ServicesPhilanthropyInternationalFood & NutritionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UV
    UTAH VALLEY UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC
    5× · 2017–2024 · $231k · revenue +5%
  • PARKINSON'S FOUNDATION INC
    3× · 2022–2024 · $46k · revenue +67%
  • GH
    GIVE HOPE GUATEMALA EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC
    5× · 2019–2024 · $42k · revenue +71%

Funded once

  • PC
    PROVO CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2022 · $13k · revenue -56%
  • OF
    OK Foundationgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $7k · revenue +659%
  • UF
    UTAH FOOD BANKgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $6k · revenue +53%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
National Kidney Foundation of Utah & Idaho

The National Kidney Foundation of Utah & Idaho, a major nonprofit health organization, is dedicated to preventing diseases of the kidney, improving the health and wellbeing of individuals and families affected by kidney disease, and…

Health
2
Utah's Promise

Utah's promise (up) is committed to 100% of kids and families thriving. we unify leaders, partners, communities and systems to achieve that promise.

Philanthropy
3
Utah Health Policy Project

To advance sustainable health care solutions for underserved utahns through better access, education, and public policy.

Health
4
Healthy Environment Alliance of Utah

Heal utah's mission is to protect utah's environment and its people by promoting clean air, clean energy, and comprehensive solutions to radioactive and toxic waste.

Environment
5
Utah Foundation

Utah foundation's mission is to produce objective, thorough and well- reasoned research and analysis that promotes the effective use of public resources, a thriving economy, a well-prepared workforce and a high quality of life for utahns.…

Public Benefit
6
Honnold Foundation

Funding solar energy solutions, building capacity, and amplifying local leadership for those experiencing the greatest impacts from climate change, economic instability, and social injustice.

Environment
7
Equality Utah Foundation

To secure equal rights and protections for lgbtq utahns and their families.

Civil Rights
8
Utah Humanities Council

Utah Humanities collaborates with libraries, museums, historical societies, schools, colleges, and cultural and civic groups; provides capacity-building opportunities for volunteers and professionals in the cultural sector; presents…

Arts & Culture
9
Allosource

Inspired by the gift of donation from our communities, allosource responsibly provides innovative cellular and tissue allografts to advance patient healing.

Health
10
Aclu of Utah Foundation Inc

The organization's mission is to preserve and promote individual civil rights and civil liberties as guaranteed by the united states and utah constitutions and the civil rights laws within the state of utah.

11
Midwives College of Utah

Educate and train midwives to provide safe, professional, affordable and personal maternity and general health care.

Education
12
United Food Bank

United Food Bank unites communities to alleviate hunger.

Food & Nutrition

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Make-a-Wish Foundation of America and the most unlike its peers is Kenneth C Savage Family Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyNyc Charter and Independent…Supportive Housing Developm…Social Impact IntermediariesFamily Philanthropic Founda…International Development A…Disease Research & Patient …Hawaiian Cultural Preservat…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 27 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number27%4%<5yr16%8%5–10yr20%25%10–20yr15%27%20–35yr9%17%35–55yr12%19%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value27%0%<5yr16%0%5–10yr20%97%10–20yr15%0%20–35yr9%2%35–55yr12%1%55yr+

The field is 27% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 17% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/51
the rest of the field
17%
17,089/102,993

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

44 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 44 of the 77 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
9
Early backer (in before they grew)
44/44
Grantees still filing
27/44
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

DECHOMAI ASSET TRUST — $19,116,000 · PhilanthropyDECHOMAI ASSET TRUST+5 more — $26,025 · PhilanthropyUTAH VALLEY UNIVERSITY — $349,500 · OtherBRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY — $260,500 · OtherTHE CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER-DAY SAINTS — $59,500 · OtherWEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY — $50,000 · Other+40 more — $275,458 · OtherUTAH VALLEY UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC — $230,500 · EducationAlpine School District Foundation — $26,000 · EducationHAITIAN ROOTS — $12,000 · Education+4 more — $18,000 · EducationALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC — $67,000 · HealthPARKINSON'S FOUNDATION INC — $46,000 · HealthLUPUS FOUNDATION OF AMERICA INC — $46,000 · HealthTHE DR DALE B HULL FOUNDATION FOR NEUROLOGICAL REHABILITATION INC — $13,000 · Health+5 more — $10,000 · HealthGIVE HOPE GUATEMALA EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC — $42,000 · Human ServicesEMBRACE OF CELEBRATION INC — $10,000 · Human ServicesCITIES STRONG FOUNDATION — $10,000 · Human ServicesStand With Ukraine Inc dba To Ukraine With Love — $4,000 · Human Services+2 more — $2,500 · Human ServicesThe Other Side Academy — $40,000 · Crime & LegalMIDDLE EAST CHILDREN'S ALLIANCE — $10,000 · InternationalUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF — $10,000 · InternationalOUELESSEBOUGOU ALLIANCE — $3,000 · International+1 more — $500 · International
Philanthropy$19,142,025Other$994,958Education$286,500Health$182,000Human Services$68,500Crime & Legal$40,000International$23,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetDECHOMAI ASSET TRUST — $19,116,000 over 1y, 4.2% of budgetUTAH VALLEY UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC — $230,500 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC — $67,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPARKINSON'S FOUNDATION INC — $46,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetLUPUS FOUNDATION OF AMERICA INC — $46,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetGIVE HOPE GUATEMALA EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC — $42,000 over 5y, 8.6% of budgetThe Other Side Academy — $40,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetAlpine School District Foundation — $26,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetLOVELOUD FOUNDATION % TRIBECA BUSINESS MGMT — $20,000 over 2y, 3.4% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE COALITION FKA FOOD & CARE COALITION OF UTAH VALLEY — $18,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetLYMEDISEASEORG — $17,000 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetTHE DR DALE B HULL FOUNDATION FOR NEUROLOGICAL REHABILITATION INC — $13,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetPROVO CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT FOUNDATION — $12,500 over 1y, 4.0% of budgetHAITIAN ROOTS — $12,000 over 3y, 2.8% of budgetUTAH VALLEY REFUGEES INC — $10,775 over 2y, 2.1% of budgetMIDDLE EAST CHILDREN'S ALLIANCE — $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetEMBRACE OF CELEBRATION INC — $10,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCITIES STRONG FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetOK Foundation — $7,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetUTAH FOOD BANK — $6,200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE LIVING PLANET INC — $6,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heritage Schools Inc — $6,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHAWAII COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOUNCIL FOR NATIVE HAWAIIAN ADVANCEMENT — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVOLUNTEERS OF AMERICA UTAH — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMAUI FOOD BANK INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN PARKINSON DISEASE ASSOC — $4,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetLive Your Dream — $4,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetStand With Ukraine Inc dba To Ukraine With Love — $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOUELESSEBOUGOU ALLIANCE — $3,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetGranite Education Foundation — $3,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetOUR RESCUE — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFight the New Drug Inc — $2,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE INN BETWEEN — $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetKENNETH C SAVAGE FAMILY FOUNDATION — $1,750 over 1y, 7.6% of budgetTHE GIVING GRINCH — $1,000 over 1y, 8.3% of budgetSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Center for Women and Children in Crisis — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBLESSINGS IN A BACKPACK INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHIMALAYAN CATARACT PROJECT INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF AMERICA — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Larry H Miller and Gail Miller Family FoundationUT30.1× affinity12 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Larry H Miller and Gail Miller Family Foundation · Sorenson Legacy Foundation · The Ashton Family Foundation · University Impact · The Community Foundation of Utah · Beesley Family Foundation · Thom & Gail Williamsen Family Foundation · Wheeler Foundation · The Kahlert Foundation Inc · Ihc Health Services Inc · George S and Dolores Dore Eccles Foundation · doTERRA Healing Hands Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Neal and Sherrie Savage Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 20%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 0%
  • Shriners Hospitals for Children0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 77 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph