Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersMostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →
Plinth

· Public charity

Power to Decide

POWER TO DECIDE envisions a world where everyone - no matter who they are or where they live - has control over their bodies and can decide if, when, and under what circumstances to get pregnant and have a child.

$591k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$419k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.

Health$3.5MScience & Tech$877kArts & Culture$486kEducation$359kCommunity Improvement$285kYouth Development$195kInternational$145kSocial Science$70kOther$0
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k7 grants · $112k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $60k
  • $250k+1 grant · $419k
$15,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$28M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CHILD TRENDS INC$418,972
MYHEALTHED INC$60,279
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO$20,691
I BE BLACK GIRL$16,000
HEALTHY START COALITION OF HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY INC$15,000
THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT ARLINGTON$15,000
COMPASSION OUTREACH OF AMERICA$15,000
FLORIDA AGRICULTURAL AND MECHANICAL UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC$15,000
ASIAN HEALTH SERVICES$15,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–25, $1.1M) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 28% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%HEALTHY START COALITION OF HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY INC: $15k → 13%TEEN HEALTH MISSISSSIPPI: $160k → 23%CHILD TRENDS INC: $419k → 8%HEALTHY TEEN NETWORK INC: $70k → 19%HEALTHY START COALITION OF HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY INC: $10k → 13%CHILD TRENDS INC: $291k → 8%COMPASSION OUTREACH OF AMERICA: $21k → 23%CHILD TRENDS INC: $49k → 8%COMPASSION OUTREACH OF AMERICA: $15k → 23%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WA
MI
NY
CT
CA
CO
NE
KY
VA
MD
NM
NC
HI
OK
LA
MS
AL
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

82%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$4.9M · 27 repeat orgs$1.1M to everyone else

27 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2025, 18 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

27
14

Total granted

$4.9M
$1.1M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+1%
+29%

Still filing today

56%
79%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesEducationCommunity ImprovementCivil RightsArts & CultureOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CT
    CHILD TRENDS INC
    3× · 2023–2025 · $759k · revenue +7%
  • AI
    APPALSHOP INC
    6× · 2019–2024 · $486k · revenue +102%
  • KH
    Kentucky Health Justice Network Inc
    4× · 2019–2022 · $261k · revenue +74%

Funded once

  • N
    NOVELLY
    one grant, 2019 · $195k · revenue -97%
  • TH
    TEEN HEALTH MISSISSIPPI
    one grant, 2019 · $160k · revenue -3%
  • IR
    International Rescue Committee INCgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $145k · revenue +67%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
CommonHealth Action

CommonHealth ACTION develops people and organizations to produce health through equitable policies, programs, and practices.

Health
2
Options360 Women's Clinic

Options360 Womens Clinic provides evidence-based educational and medical services related to sexual health in a caring and respectful environment.

Civil Rights
3
HealthImpact

To shape health care through workforce strategy, stakeholder convening, and policy advocacy.

Health
4
The Birth Center

The birth center dba lifecycle wellness and birth center is an independent non-profit organization and free-standing, out-of-hospital birth center. our team of midwives and nurse-practitioners provide empowering gynecology and…

—
5
Arizona Family Health Partnership

To make sexual and reproductive healthcare accessible to everyone

—
6
Midwives College of Utah

Educate and train midwives to provide safe, professional, affordable and personal maternity and general health care.

Education
7
University Health Inc

Primary functions are the coordination and delivery of health care resources and services, health care education for the hospital service area, long range analysis of health care needs and development of programs, and arranging for…

—
8
University Associates in Obstetrics and Gynecology University Faculty Pract ice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
9
Care Net Center of Greater Orleans

Pregnancy counseling

Unclassified
10
Gender Ideal Inc dba Reproductive & Maternal Health Com

Gender IDEAL launched the Reproductive & Maternal Health Compass. RMH Compass works to support and protect reproductive and maternal health (RMH) benefits for all workers in the U.S. by engaging with employers to assess and expand their…

Civil Rights
11
Healthcare Access Maryland Inc

We are making maryland healthier by connecting residents to insurance and care, educating the community about healthier living, and advocating a more equitable health care system.

Health
12
Intrahealth International Inc

Our mission is to improve the performance of health workers and strengthen the systems in which they work.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Child Trends Inc and the most unlike its peers is International Rescue Committee Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyCommunity Arts OrganizationsFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Public University Foundatio…Community Health CentersUnited Way FederationsPregnancy Support ServicesSubstance Abuse Treatment
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 42 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%7%<5yr14%11%5–10yr19%14%10–20yr16%14%20–35yr13%25%35–55yr16%29%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%1%<5yr14%29%5–10yr19%14%10–20yr16%3%20–35yr13%36%35–55yr16%17%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 7% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 5% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
5%
2/41
the rest of the field
13%
240,394/1,819,524

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

29 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 29 of the 41 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
26/29
Grantees still filing
15/29
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO — $309,684 · OtherREGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF COLORADOASK BOINK INC — $276,554 · OtherASK BOINK INCSENTIENT RESEARCH — $254,937 · OtherSENTIENT RESEARCHWESTAT CORP — $229,735 · OtherWESTAT CORPTWO X TWO — $205,000 · OtherTWO X TWONOVELLY — $195,000 · OtherNOVELLYESSENTIAL ACCESS HEALTH — $134,922 · OtherESSENTIAL ACCESS HEALTHGUSH PRODUCTIONS LLC — $85,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON — $80,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO — $75,098 · Other+11 more — $373,460 · Other+11 moreMY HEALTH ED INC — $1,031,684 · HealthMY HEALTH ED INCKentucky Health Justice Network Inc — $261,384 · HealthKentucky Health Justice Networ…Washington State Pharmacy Foundation — $189,264 · HealthWashington State Pharmacy Foun…+4 more — $115,000 · Health+4 moreCHILD TRENDS INC — $759,413 · Human ServicesCHILD TRENDS INCTEEN HEALTH MISSISSIPPI — $159,818 · Human ServicesTEEN HEALTH MISSISS…HEALTHY TEEN NETWORK INC — $70,000 · Human ServicesHEALTHY TEEN NETWOR…COMPASSION OUTREACH OF AMERICA — $36,230 · Human Services+1 more — $25,000 · Human ServicesAPPALSHOP INC — $486,000 · Arts & CultureAPPALSHOP…CAPACITY BUILDERS INC — $284,604 · Community ImprovementMISSISSIPPI FIRST INC — $95,000 · Community ImprovementInternational Rescue Committee INC — $145,000 · InternationalOKAYSO — $65,000 · EducationFlorida Agricultural & Mechanical Univ Foundation Inc — $46,230 · EducationTuskegee University — $21,230 · EducationDILLARD UNIVERSITY — $10,000 · Education
Other$2,219,390Health$1,597,332Human Services$1,050,461Arts & Culture$486,000Community Improvement$379,604International$145,000Education$142,460

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetMY HEALTH ED INC — $1,031,684 over 8y, 94% of budgetCHILD TRENDS INC — $759,413 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetAPPALSHOP INC — $486,000 over 6y, 4.4% of budgetCAPACITY BUILDERS INC — $284,604 over 2y, 3.3% of budgetKentucky Health Justice Network Inc — $261,384 over 4y, 12% of budgetWashington State Pharmacy Foundation — $189,264 over 2y, 64% of budgetTEEN HEALTH MISSISSIPPI — $159,818 over 1y, 10% of budgetInternational Rescue Committee INC — $145,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetESSENTIAL ACCESS HEALTH — $134,922 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetMISSISSIPPI FIRST INC — $95,000 over 1y, 7.0% of budgetHEALTHY TEEN NETWORK INC — $70,000 over 1y, 3.4% of budgetInstitute of Women & Ethnic Studies — $70,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetFlorida Agricultural & Mechanical Univ Foundation Inc — $46,230 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetHONESTLY INC — $30,000 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetHawaii Youth Services Network — $30,000 over 3y, 1.6% of budgetHENRY FORD HEALTH SYSTEM — $30,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetWOMEN'S BIRTH AND WELLNESS CENTER INC — $30,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetCARDEA SERVICES — $30,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetI BE BLACK GIRL — $26,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetASIAN HEALTH SERVICES — $25,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHEALTHY START COALITION OF HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY INC — $25,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetREUBEN V ANDERSON CENTER FOR JUSTICE — $21,230 over 1y, 3.2% of budgetTuskegee University — $21,230 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED WAY OF CENTRAL NEW YORK INC — $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetDILLARD UNIVERSITY — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

WK Kellogg FoundationThe David and Lucile …The Grove FoundationRockefeller Philanthr…The Robert Wood Johns…Annie E Casey Foundat…Silicon Valley Commun…Charities Aid Foundat…Vanguard Charitable E…American Online Givin…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …
WK Kellogg FoundationMI17× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: WK Kellogg Foundation · The David and Lucile Packard Foundation · The Grove Foundation · Rockefeller Philanthropy Advisors Inc · The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation · Annie E Casey Foundation Inc · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Power to Decide funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 70%
  • Healthy Teen Network Inc — 70% of income from government
  • Child Trends Inc — 50% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
2rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 41 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines