Skip to content
The Nanar and Anthony Yoseloff Foundation Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

The Nanar and Anthony Yoseloff Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.3M
Granted FY2025still arriving
22
Grants FY2025still arriving
10
States reached
$275k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.

Education$2.8MPhilanthropy$1.1MYouth Development$450kInternational$325kArts & Culture$255kHealth$225kRecreation & Sports$150kScience & Tech$100kOther$0
02FY2025 · 22 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k14 grants · $335k
  • $50k–250k7 grants · $730k
  • $250k+1 grant · $275k
$25,000
Median grant
10
States reached
$27M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JEWISH COMMUNAL FUND$275,000
BRYN MAWR COLLEGE$200,000
DONORSCHOOSE$150,000
LEADERSHIP ENTERPRISE FOR A DIVERSE AMERICA$125,000
COUNCIL ON FOREIGN RELATIONS$100,000
PRINCETON UNIVERSITY$55,000
STATE UNIVERSITY OF IOWA FOUNDATION$50,000
JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY$50,000
EXPLORATION SCHOOL INC - EXPLO$25,000
NAVIGATE THE MAZE TO ACHIEVEMENT$25,000
YOGI BERRA MUSEUM & LEARNING CENTER$25,000
INTERLOCHEN CENTER FOR THE ARTS$25,000
LETS TALK WOMEN'S HEALTH & WELLNESS$25,000
INSTITUTE FOR CITIZENS & SCHOLARS$25,000
EAST BRUNSWICK EDUCATION FOUNDATION$25,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY21–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 64% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%SOCIETY FOR AMERICAN BASEBALL RESEARCH: $25k → 11%EXPLO: $25k → 7%Mayo Clinic: $50k → 9%FILMNORTH: $100k → 14%Bryn Mawr College: $250k → 10%Character Lab: $25k → 22%DonorsChoose: $200k → 17%NAVIGATE THE MAZE TO ACHIEVEMENT: $25k → 20%METO INC: $25k → 14%University of Iowa Foundation: $25k → 15%INTERLOCHEN CENTER FOR THE ARTS: $25k → 10%Ripple Center: $25k → 4%EAST BRUNSWICK EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $25k → 8%INSTITUTE FOR CITIZENS & SCHOLARS: $125k → 11%YOGI BERRA MUSEUM & LEARNING CENTER: $25k → 12%Ripple Center: $25k → 16%Johns Hopkins Center for Talented Youth: $75k → 11%JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $50k → 19%SOCIETY FOR AMERICAN BASEBALL RESEARCH: $25k → 11%MAYO CLINIC: $50k → 9%BRYN MAWR COLLEGE: $200k → 10%DONORSCHOOSE: $150k → 17%Princeton University: $55k → 11%JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $50k → 19%BRYN MAWR COLLEGE: $200k → 10%DonorsChooseorg: $150k → 17%PRINCETON UNIVERSITY: $55k → 11%Johns Hopkins University: $50k → 19%Bryn Mawr College: $100k → 10%DONORSCHOOSE: $150k → 17%Smithsonian National Postal Museum: $30k → 14%PRINCETON UNIVERSITY: $55k → 11%Bryn Mawr College: $100k → 10%LEADERSHIP ENTERPRISE FOR A DIVERSE AMERICA: $150k → 17%Princeton University: $50k → 11%LEADERSHIP ENTERPRISE FOR A DIVERSE AMERICA: $125k → 17%Leadership Enterprise for a Diverse America: $100k → 17%Leadership Enterprise for a Diverse America: $100k → 17%Leadership Enterprise for a Diverse America: $100k → 17%Jewish Communal Fund: $450k → 17%Jewish Communal Fund: $350k → 17%JEWISH COMMUNAL FUND: $275k → 17%Jewish Communal Fund: $50k → 17%COUNCIL ON FOREIGN RELATIONS: $100k → 17%COUNCIL ON FOREIGN RELATIONS: $50k → 17%Council on Foreign Relations: $50k → 17%Council on Foreign Relations: $50k → 17%Girls Inc: $50k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
MI
NY
MA
IA
PA
NJ
MD
AZ
DC
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$4.0M · 20 repeat orgs$315k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +4% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

20 repeat relationships: 18 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
5

Total granted

$4.0M
$255k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+4%
0%

Still filing today

85%
20%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $60k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
EducationArts & CultureYouth DevelopmentInternationalRecreation & SportsPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BM
    BRYN MAWR COLLEGE
    5× · 2021–2025 · $850k · revenue +14%
  • LE
    LEADERSHIP ENTERPRISE FOR A DIVERSE AMERICA
    5× · 2021–2025 · $575k · revenue +88%
  • IF
    INSTITUTE FOR CITIZENS AND SCHOLARS
    5× · 2021–2025 · $225k · revenue +315%

Funded once

  • F
    FILMNORTH
    one grant, 2024 · $100k · revenue 0%
  • JH
    Johns Hopkins Center for Talented Youth
    one grant, 2022 · $75k
  • SN
    Smithsonian National Postal Museum
    one grant, 2022 · $30k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
2
President and Fellows of Harvard College

Undergraduate, graduate, and professional education and research across a broad array of academic domains.

Education
3
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
4
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
5
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
6
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
7
Manhattanville University

To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.

Education
8
The George Washington University

The mission of the george washington university (gw) is to educate individuals in liberal arts, languages, sciences, learned professions, and other courses and subjects of study, and to conduct scholarly research and publish the findings…

Education
9
Institute for Advanced Study - Louis Bamberger & Mrs Felix Fuld Foundation

The institute for advanced study (the institute) is one of the world's leading centers for theoretical research and intellectual inquiry. see schedule o.

Science & Tech
10
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
11
National Association of College and University Attorneys

To advance the practice of higher education attorneys for the benefit of the institutions they serve.

—
12
Harvard Club of Washington Dc

To inform and enrich the intellectual lives of 20,000 alumni of harvard university in the washington, dc area and to assist harvard university with respect to applicants and undergraduates from the dc area.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Donorschooseorg; the most unlike its peers is Navigate the Maze to Achievement Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 30 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/20
Grantees still filing
14/20
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BRYN MAWR COLLEGE: $850,000 · EducationBRYN MAWR COLLEGEDONORSCHOOSEORG: $650,000 · EducationDONORSCHOOSEORGLEADERSHIP ENTERPRISE FOR A DIVERSE AMERICA: $575,000 · EducationLEADERSHIP ENTERPRISE FOR A DIVERSE AMERICAThe Trustees of Princeton University: $215,000 · EducationThe Trustees of Princeton UniversityJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $150,000 · EducationJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITYSTATE UNIVERSITY OF IOWA FOUNDATION: $125,000 · Education+1 more: $75,000 · EducationJEWISH COMMUNAL FUND: $1,125,000 · PhilanthropyJEWISH COMMUNAL FUNDEAST BRUNSWICK EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $70,000 · PhilanthropyEAST BRUNSWICK EDUCATION…INSTITUTE FOR CITIZENS AND SCHOLARS: $225,000 · OtherINSTITUTE FOR CI…MAYO CLINIC: $100,000 · OtherMAYO CLINICTHE RIPPLE CENTER: $100,000 · OtherTHE RIPPLE CENTE…THE CHARACTER LAB INC: $75,000 · OtherTHE CHARACTER LA…Johns Hopkins Center for Talented Youth: $75,000 · OtherJohns Hopkins Ce…Exploration School Inc - EXPLO: $75,000 · OtherExploration Scho…Smithsonian National Postal Museum: $30,000 · Other+5 more: $110,000 · Other+5 moreFILMNORTH: $100,000 · Arts & CultureSMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION: $75,000 · Arts & CultureFRIENDS OF YOGI INC: $50,000 · Arts & CultureINTERLOCHEN CENTER FOR THE ARTS: $50,000 · Arts & CultureCOUNCIL ON FOREIGN RELATIONS INC: $250,000 · InternationalGIRLS INC: $150,000 · Youth DevelopmentNAVIGATE THE MAZE TO ACHIEVEMENT INC: $45,000 · Youth DevelopmentSOCIETY FOR AMERICAN BASEBALL RESEARCH INC: $90,000 · Recreation & SportsMAYO CLINIC: $50,000 · Health
Education$2,640,000Philanthropy$1,195,000Other$790,000Arts & Culture$275,000International$250,000Youth Development$195,000Recreation & Sports$90,000Health$50,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetJEWISH COMMUNAL FUND: $1,125,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetBRYN MAWR COLLEGE: $850,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetDONORSCHOOSEORG: $650,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetLEADERSHIP ENTERPRISE FOR A DIVERSE AMERICA: $575,000 over 5y, 4.9% of budgetCOUNCIL ON FOREIGN RELATIONS INC: $250,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetINSTITUTE FOR CITIZENS AND SCHOLARS: $225,000 over 5y, 1.8% of budgetThe Trustees of Princeton University: $215,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $150,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetGIRLS INC: $150,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetSTATE UNIVERSITY OF IOWA FOUNDATION: $125,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFILMNORTH: $100,000 over 1y, 5.1% of budgetSOCIETY FOR AMERICAN BASEBALL RESEARCH INC: $90,000 over 4y, 2.0% of budgetTHE CHARACTER LAB INC: $75,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetMETO INC: $75,000 over 3y, 2.4% of budgetSMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION: $75,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetEAST BRUNSWICK EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $70,000 over 4y, 9.8% of budgetFRIENDS OF YOGI INC: $50,000 over 2y, 2.8% of budgetMAYO CLINIC: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetINTERLOCHEN CENTER FOR THE ARTS: $50,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetNAVIGATE THE MAZE TO ACHIEVEMENT INC: $45,000 over 3y, 14% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds JEWISH COMMUNAL FUND ↗
  • Who funds BRYN MAWR COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds DONORSCHOOSEORG ↗
  • Who funds LEADERSHIP ENTERPRISE FOR A DIVERSE AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds COUNCIL ON FOREIGN RELATIONS INC ↗
  • Who funds INSTITUTE FOR CITIZENS AND SCHOLARS ↗
  • Who funds The Trustees of Princeton University ↗
  • Who funds JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds GIRLS INC ↗
  • Who funds STATE UNIVERSITY OF IOWA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FILMNORTH ↗
  • Who funds SOCIETY FOR AMERICAN BASEBALL RESEARCH INC ↗
  • Who funds THE CHARACTER LAB INC ↗
  • Who funds METO INC ↗
  • Who funds SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION ↗
  • Who funds EAST BRUNSWICK EDUCATION FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF YOGI INC ↗
  • Who funds MAYO CLINIC ↗
  • Who funds INTERLOCHEN CENTER FOR THE ARTS ↗
  • Who funds NAVIGATE THE MAZE TO ACHIEVEMENT INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Anthony a Yoselof…Silicon Valley Commun…The Pfizer Foundation…National Philanthropi…Vanguard Charitable E…American Online Givin…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
The Anthony a Yoseloff Foundation IncNY13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Anthony a Yoseloff Foundation Inc · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Nanar and Anthony Yoseloff Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Nanar and Anthony Yoseloff Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →median 12%
  • Johns Hopkins University: 12% of income from government
  • The Trustees of Princeton University: 11% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Nanar and Anthony Yoseloff Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to The Nanar and Anthony Yoseloff Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 30 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Nanar and Anthony Yoseloff’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home