Skip to content

Indiana · Private foundation

The Namaste Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$626k
Granted FY2025(still arriving)
26
Grants FY2025
24
Organizations funded FY2024
13%
First-time grantees FY2024
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2025
$17,000
Largest grant, FY2025
$75,000
Organizations funded a year
24 to 38
FY2020 to FY2024
States reached, FY2025
6
Total assets, FY2025
$17M
Applications
Preselected organizations only
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2024, 13% of the organizations The Namaste Foundation Inc funded were first-time grantees, receiving 6% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $33k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24
EducationHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2025still arriving25$611k12%
FY202424$514k13%
FY202333$505k3%
FY202233$481k3%
FY202134$398k6%
FY202038$396kn/a
96% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Environment$685kHealth$429kPhilanthropy$349kInternational$261kYouth Development$197kEducation$195kPublic Benefit$175kRecreation & Sports$150kOther$0

Where its grants go

Grant dollars by states, across the years we hold.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
IL
NY
MA
IN
CA
CO
VA
DC

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2020 to FY2025, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

Show all 33 grantees

What it could do for these grantees

Plus 15 recipients with no EIN on record ($837k), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

Each grantee by its size and the share of its budget The Namaste Foundation Inc supplied at peak.

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUnited Way of Bartholomew County Inc: $215,000 over 6y, 3.4% of budgetSycamore Land Trust Incorporated: $210,000 over 6y, 1.8% of budgetThe Cycle Effect: $156,000 over 6y, 2.0% of budgetPacific Crest Trail Association: $150,000 over 6y, 0.8% of budgetWildlife Conservation Network Inc: $125,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetTurning Point Inc: $110,500 over 6y, 8.2% of budgetThe Orion Society Inc: $100,000 over 6y, 1.4% of budgetGreenhouse Scholars: $95,000 over 6y, 0.7% of budgetBusinesses Ending Slavery & Trafficking: $95,000 over 6y, 3.3% of budgetTibet Fund Inc: $85,500 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetMedecins Sans Frontieres USA Inc: $85,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetThe Conservation Law Center Inc: $82,000 over 6y, 3.2% of budgetColorado Water Trust: $82,000 over 6y, 1.2% of budgetCommunity Services of Broomfield: $70,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetInternational Planned Parenthood Federation Western Hemisphere Region: $65,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetHoosier Environmental Council Inc: $62,500 over 6y, 1.6% of budgetNational Parks Conservation Association: $50,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetWow Children's Museum World of Wonder: $47,500 over 6y, 1.2% of budgetFoundation for Youth Inc: $22,000 over 6y, 2.5% of budgetEarthjustice: $18,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetC I R C L E: $17,000 over 2y, 3.6% of budgetInternational Campaign for Tibet: $14,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetHistoric Landmarks Foundation of Indiana Inc: $12,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetRegis University: $12,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWorld Wildlife Fund Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetColumbus Area Arts Council Inc: $10,000 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetThe National Museum of Women in the Arts: $8,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetEiteljorg Museum of American Indians and Western Art Inc: $8,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetThe Conservation Fund a Nonprofit Corporation: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNational Women's History Museum: $4,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetFreedom Service Dogs Inc: $3,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 31.

Nonprofits that may fit its grantmaking

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Kirr Foundation IncIN17.9× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Kirr Foundation Inc · Elizabeth Ruddick Nugent Foundation · Clarence E Custer and Inez R Custer · The Ayco Charitable Foundation · Centra Foundation Inc · Duke Energy Foundation · Colorado Gives Foundation · Carl Marshall Reeves and Mildred Almen Reeves Foundation Inc · Nina Mason Pulliam Charitable Trust · Central Indiana Community Foundation Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare The Namaste Foundation Inc with peer funders

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Namaste Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to The Namaste Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

About The Namaste Foundation Inc

How much does The Namaste Foundation Inc give?
The Namaste Foundation Inc reported 26 grants totaling $625,500 in its FY2025 IRS filing. It funded between 24 and 38 organizations a year over FY2020 to FY2024.
What does The Namaste Foundation Inc fund?
By grant dollars over FY2020 to FY2025, its largest causes are Environment (23%), Health (14%), Philanthropy (12%).
Who are The Namaste Foundation Inc's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2020 to FY2025: United Way of Bartholomew County Inc ($215k), Sycamore Land Trust Incorporated ($210k), The Cycle Effect ($156k).
Does The Namaste Foundation Inc fund new organizations?
In FY2024, 13% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Does The Namaste Foundation Inc accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and does not take unsolicited requests. Check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
Which funders back the same organizations as The Namaste Foundation Inc?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include The Kirr Foundation Inc, Elizabeth Ruddick Nugent Foundation, Clarence E Custer and Inez R Custer.
Where is The Namaste Foundation Inc based?
The Namaste Foundation Inc is based in IN.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 50 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Namaste’s filings →

More from the funding graph