Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Nagourney Institute

Its FY2023 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$4k
Granted FY2023
8
Grants FY2023
5
States reached
$1k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2023.

Health$81kInternational$11kCivil Rights$8kYouth Development$5kEducation$4kEnvironment$4kHousing & Shelter$750Public Safety & Disaster$500Other$0
02FY2023 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$500
Median grant
5
States reached
$414k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LONG BEACH AREA COUNCIL$1,150
MEMORIAL MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION$1,036
AACR FOUNDATION$500
MCGILL UNIVERSITY$500
ROCKY MOUNTAIN INSTITUTE$500
BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF LONG BEACH$360
ELIXIR FUND$100
PEOPLE AGAINST CANCER$100
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

US giving: 87% of grant dollars ($100k). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 13% that went abroad ($14k) is mapped below.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–19, $100) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%THE BUCKET LIST PROJECT FOUNDATION: $100 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Beyond the US: 13% of all-years giving ($14k)

2 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
Brazil$11k · 1 grant
Canada$4k · 7 grants
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$100k · 17 repeat orgs$14k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +34% since the first grant, against +4% for those funded once.

17 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2023, 9 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
10

Total granted

$100k
$14k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+34%
+4%

Still filing today

59%
30%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
HealthEducationYouth DevelopmentArts & CultureHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • Rocky Mountain Institute
    7× · 2017–2023 · $4k · revenue +381%
  • LB
    LONG BEACH AREA COUNCIL BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA
    2× · 2022–2023 · $3k · revenue +34%
  • CU
    CHAPMAN UNIVERSITY
    2× · 2020–2021 · $2k · revenue +22%

Funded once

  • C
    CASSEMS
    one grant, 2020 · $11k
  • LB
    LONG BEACH BRANCH OF NAACP
    one grant, 2022 · $1k
  • SH
    SIGNAL HILL POLICE OFFICERS' ASSOCIATION
    one grant, 2022 · $500 · revenue +13%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Ucla Foundation

The ucla foundation is the giving, receiving, and investing arm of the ucla campus. the foundation enables private donors to help build, sustain and advance one of the world's finest academic and research institutions. private philanthropy…

Education
2
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
3
Addario Lung Cancer Medical Institute

The Addario Lung Cancer Medical Institute ALCMI is dedicated to catalyzing and accelerating the discovery, development and delivery of new and more effective treatment options for lung cancer patients.

Health
4
Asco Association

Asco association promotes the common business interests of its members by: (1) advocating for policies that improve the quality of cancer care; (2) maintaining the highest standards of oncology medical care through programs supporting…

Community Improvement
5
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
6
Curebound

Curebound's mission is to accelerate cancer research and save lives. we raise and invest strategic funding for innovative adult and pediatric cancer research with one vision: cures in our lifetime.

Health
7
Long Beach State Foundation

The foundation seeks, secures and manages private support for california state university, long beach. (see schedule o)as the philanthropic foundation for the university, all donations in support of our students, faculty, programs and…

Education
8
Parker Institute for Cancer Immunotherapy

The parker institute for cancer immunotherapy's (pici) mission is to develop and accelerate access to breakthrough cancer therapies, curating innovation from discovery to patient access.

Health
9
Lung Cancer Research Foundation

The mission of the lung cancer research foundation is to improve lung cancer outcomes by funding research for the prevention, diagnosis, treatment and cure of lung cancer.

Health
10
The Breast Cancer Research Foundation Inc

The mission of the breast cancer research foundation, inc. is to prevent and cure breast cancer by advancing the world's most promising research.

Public Safety & Disaster
11
Targeting Resistance in Cancer Cooperative
Health
12
California State University Long Beach Research Foundation

Serves the mission of the university by supporting and engaging in research, entrepreneurship, community service, sponsored programs and the acquisition of private resources.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Memorial Medical Center Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Rocky Mountain Institute. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
9/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

VANGUARD CANCER FOUNDATION: $71,250 · HealthVANGUARD CANCER FOUNDATION+2 more: $1,836 · HealthCASSEMS: $10,863 · OtherCASSEMSLONG BEACH BRANCH NAACP: $6,200 · OtherLONG BEACH BRANCH NAACPMCGILL UNIVERSITY: $3,500 · OtherMCGILL UNIVERSITYRocky Mountain Institute: $3,500 · OtherRocky Mountain InstituteAACR FOUNDATION: $3,250 · OtherAACR FOUNDATIONLONG BEACH AREA COUNCIL BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA: $2,900 · OtherLONG BEACH AREA COUNCIL BOY SCOUTS O…THE CHAPMAN FUND: $1,500 · OtherLONG BEACH BRANCH OF NAACP: $1,400 · Other+12 more: $4,079 · Other+12 moreCHAPMAN UNIVERSITY: $2,000 · EducationBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF LONG BEACH: $1,561 · Youth DevelopmentRANCHO LOS ALAMITOS FOUNDATION: $100 · Arts & CultureThe Bucket List Project Foundation: $100 · Human Services
Health$73,086Other$37,192Education$2,000Youth Development$1,561Arts & Culture$100Human Services$100

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetVANGUARD CANCER FOUNDATION: $71,250 over 6y, 11% of budgetRocky Mountain Institute: $3,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetLONG BEACH AREA COUNCIL BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA: $2,900 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCHAPMAN UNIVERSITY: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF LONG BEACH: $1,561 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMEMORIAL MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION: $1,136 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPEOPLE AGAINST CANCER: $700 over 7y, 0.5% of budgetELIXIR FUND: $700 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetTRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY: $600 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSIGNAL HILL POLICE OFFICERS' ASSOCIATION: $500 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetCAMP FIRE ANGELES: $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetRANCHO LOS ALAMITOS FOUNDATION: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Bucket List Project Foundation: $100 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds VANGUARD CANCER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Rocky Mountain Institute ↗
  • Who funds LONG BEACH AREA COUNCIL BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds CHAPMAN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF LONG BEACH ↗
  • Who funds MEMORIAL MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds PEOPLE AGAINST CANCER ↗
  • Who funds ELIXIR FUND ↗
  • Who funds TRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds SIGNAL HILL POLICE OFFICERS' ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds CAMP FIRE ANGELES ↗
  • Who funds RANCHO LOS ALAMITOS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds The Bucket List Project Foundation ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Earl B & Loraine H Miller FoundationCA13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Earl B & Loraine H Miller Foundation · Long Beach Community Foundation · California Community Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Nagourney Institute funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Nagourney Institute. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →median 13%
  • Trustees of Boston University: 13% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Nagourney Institute’s filings →

More from the funding graph