Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Nabors to Neighbors Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$326k
Granted FY2025still arriving
30
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$828kHuman Services$808kYouth Development$200kReligion$180kEducation$110kFood & Nutrition$100kAnimals$95kCrime & Legal$85kOther$0
02FY2025 · 30 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k7 grants · $36k
  • $10k–50k22 grants · $240k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$10,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$4.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SAINT JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL$50,000
WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT$25,000
SHRINERS$15,000
RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE$10,000
ROSSWOODS INC$10,000
DEO CLINIC$10,000
SALVATION ARMY$10,000
FAMILY SUPPORT COUNCIL INC$10,000
TOYS FOR TOTS$10,000
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB$10,000
VARNELL COMMUNITY CHRISTMAS FUNDRAISER$10,000
CITY OF REFUGE$10,000
WESTSIDE MIDDLE SCHOOL$10,000
LEUKEMIA & LYMPHOMA SOCIETY$10,000
AUSTIN HATCHER FOUNDATION FOR PEDIATRIC CANCER$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–20, $40k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%CITY OF REFUGE DALTON: $10k → 13%CITY OF REFUGE DALTON: $10k → 13%CITY OF REFUGE DALTON: $10k → 13%CITY OF REFUGE DALTON: $10k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.6M · 37 repeat orgs$65k to everyone else

37 repeat relationships: 27 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

37
5

Total granted

$2.6M
$45k

Still filing today

43%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $20k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesPhilanthropyCrime & LegalFood & NutritionArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $450k · revenue +145%
  • DC
    DEO CLINIC INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $90k · revenue +529%
  • FS
    FAMILY SUPPORT COUNCIL INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $85k · revenue +50%

Funded once

  • DS
    DALTON SHRINE CLUB
    one grant, 2017 · $15k
  • TG
    THE GREENHOUSE INC
    one grant, 2018 · $10k
  • LI
    LIFT INC
    one grant, 2021 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
East Tennessee Children's Hospital Association Inc

East tennessee children's hospital is a free-standing, independent, not-for-profit pediatric health care system which serves the east tennessee region. children's hospital is certified by the state of tennessee as a comprehensive regional…

Health
2
Thompson Cancer Survival Center

Thompson Cancer Survival Center provides support services for cancer patients, in alignment with Covenant Health's mission to serve the community by improving the quality of life through better health, regardless of a patient's ability to…

—
3
Visiting Nurse Health System Inc

Founded in 1948, visiting nurse health system is georgia's solution to healthcare and aging at home. for over 75 years, visiting nurse has served as georgia's first and largest nonprofit provider of health and hospice care in the home, and…

Health
4
American Cancer Society Inc

Improve the lives of people with cancer and their families through advocacy, research, and patient support, to ensure everyone has an opportunity to prevent, detect, treat, and survive cancer.

Health
5
Medical Center of Central Georgia Inc

To enhance the health status of those we serve in partnership with medical staff and other community organizations by providing wellness services, health education, training, and access to safe high quality health care services.

Health
6
Hospice of Wake County Inc

To care for individuals and families with compassion, support, and expertise as they navigate the end of life or life-changing illness.

—
7
Hospice of Gaston County Inc

To provide compassionate, exceptional and highly reliable care.

—
8
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
9
Authoracare Collective

Authoracare collective empowers people to be active participants in their care journey, enabling them to live on their own terms through personalized support for mind, body, and spirit.

Human Services
10
Global Down Syndrome Foundation

To significantly improve the lives of people with down syndrome through research, medical care, education and advocacy. an important part of this mission is to support the global affiliate organizations that we helped establish and…

Health
11
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center

Fred hutch cancer center ("fred hutch") unites innovative research and compassionate care to prevent and eliminate cancer and infectious disease. continued on schedule o

Health
12
Chattahoochee Hospice Inc

The organization pledges to provide quality programs, service, and technology to meet the unique physical, emotional, and spiritual needs of the terminally ill and their families, and to educate the community about end of life issues.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is City of Refuge; the most unlike its peers is Blood Cancer United Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 45 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/17
Grantees still filing
8/17
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $225,000 · OtherWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECTWESTSIDE MIDDLE SCHOOL: $95,000 · OtherWESTSIDE MIDDLE SCHOOLRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE: $90,204 · OtherRONALD MCDONALD HOUSEROSSWOODS INC: $90,000 · OtherROSSWOODS INCBOY'S AND GIRLS CLUB: $90,000 · OtherBOY'S AND GIRLS CLUBTHE SALVATION ARMY: $90,000 · OtherTHE SALVATION ARMYBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF THE NW GEORGIA MOUNTAINS: $90,000 · OtherBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF THE NW GEORGIA MOUNTAINSSHRINERS: $60,000 · OtherMEMORIAL CHILDRENS HOSPITAL: $54,000 · Other+23 more: $647,000 · Other+23 moreST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $450,000 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HO…DEO CLINIC INC: $90,000 · HealthDEO CLINIC INCTHE SHRINERS' HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN: $45,000 · HealthTHE SHRINERS' HOSPITAL FOR CHI…ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $40,000 · HealthALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED …BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $40,000 · HealthBLOOD CANCER UNITED INCWELCOME HOME OF CHATTANOOGA: $29,000 · HealthNorthwest Georgia Family Crisis Center: $80,000 · Human ServicesCITY OF REFUGE DALTON INC: $40,000 · Human ServicesFAMILY SUPPORT COUNCIL INC: $85,000 · Crime & LegalChattanooga Area Food Bank Inc: $70,000 · Food & NutritionMARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION: $36,000 · PhilanthropyAUSTIN HATCHER FOUNDATION FOR PEDIATRIC CANCER: $30,000 · PhilanthropyLIFT YOUTH CENTER INC: $50,000 · Youth Development
Other$1,531,204Health$694,000Human Services$120,000Crime & Legal$85,000Food & Nutrition$70,000Philanthropy$66,000Youth Development$50,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $450,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetROSSWOODS INC: $90,000 over 9y, 1.4% of budgetDEO CLINIC INC: $90,000 over 9y, 13% of budgetFAMILY SUPPORT COUNCIL INC: $85,000 over 9y, 0.5% of budgetNorthwest Georgia Family Crisis Center: $80,000 over 8y, 0.6% of budgetChattanooga Area Food Bank Inc: $70,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetLIFT YOUTH CENTER INC: $50,000 over 5y, 2.6% of budgetCITY OF REFUGE: $50,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetTHE SHRINERS' HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN: $45,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $40,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $40,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetELDERHEART INC: $40,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetCITY OF REFUGE DALTON INC: $40,000 over 4y, 1.5% of budgetMARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION: $36,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetAUSTIN HATCHER FOUNDATION FOR PEDIATRIC CANCER: $30,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetWELCOME HOME OF CHATTANOOGA: $29,000 over 6y, 0.9% of budgetAMERICAN LEGION 95 WILLIAM E BLAIR: $5,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds ROSSWOODS INC ↗
  • Who funds DEO CLINIC INC ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY SUPPORT COUNCIL INC ↗
  • Who funds Northwest Georgia Family Crisis Center ↗
  • Who funds Chattanooga Area Food Bank Inc ↗
  • Who funds LIFT YOUTH CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds CITY OF REFUGE ↗
  • Who funds THE SHRINERS' HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC ↗
  • Who funds ELDERHEART INC ↗
  • Who funds CITY OF REFUGE DALTON INC ↗
  • Who funds MARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds AUSTIN HATCHER FOUNDATION FOR PEDIATRIC CANCER ↗
  • Who funds WELCOME HOME OF CHATTANOOGA ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Community Foundation of Northwest Georgia IncGA19.9× affinity7 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Community Foundation of Northwest Georgia Inc · United Way of Northwest Georgiainc · White Family Foundation Inc · Mohawk Carpet Foundation Inc · Chattanooga Christian Community Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Nabors to Neighbors Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Nabors to Neighbors Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →median 6%
  • The Shriners' Hospital for Children: 6% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Nabors to Neighbors Inc?

Find your warmest path to The Nabors to Neighbors Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 45 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Nabors to Neighbors’ filings →

More from the funding graph