Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Myron P Leven Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$389k
Granted FY2025still arriving
20
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$104k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$1.4MArts & Culture$434kPhilanthropy$121kHuman Services$66kHealth$61kCrime & Legal$57kEmployment$38kInternational$35kOther$0
02FY2025 · 20 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k13 grants · $55k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $56k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $278k
$6,375
Median grant
3
States reached
$7.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LA SED (LATIN AMERICAN FOR SOCIAL & ECONOMIC DEV)$103,900
DETROIT SYMPHONY AND METRO YOUTH ORCHESTRA$62,000
OTHER COLLEGES AND UNIVERSITIES$59,000
WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY$53,000
UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN (ANN ARBOR & DEARBORN)$33,500
GESHER HUMAN SERVICES$12,500
FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES$10,000
DETROIT INSTITUTE OF ARTS$8,750
UNIVERSITY OF DETROIT MERCY$7,000
MICHIGAN SCIENCE CENTER$6,375
WRCJ 909 FM RADIO$6,000
CYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION$5,000
MICHIGAN JAZZ FESTIVAL$5,000
ST JUDES CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL$5,000
GILDA'S CLUB OF METRO DETROIT$3,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–25, $8k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES: $3k → 8%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES: $3k → 8%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES: $3k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.2M · 26 repeat orgs$6k to everyone else

26 repeat relationships: 20 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

26
2

Total granted

$2.2M
$6k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+20%
+26%

Still filing today

42%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureEducationEmploymentInternationalHealthHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UNIVERSITY OF DETROIT MERCY
    8× · 2017–2025 · $74k · revenue +20%
  • GH
    GESHER HUMAN SERVICES
    3× · 2023–2025 · $38k · revenue +47%
  • THE DETROIT INSTITUTE OF ARTS
    6× · 2017–2025 · $36k · revenue +46%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $5k
  • LA
    LATIN AMERICANS FOR SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT INCgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $1k · revenue +26%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
About Face Detroit
—
2
Jewish Historical Society of Michigan

Jewish historical society of michigan shares and celebrates the experiences and contributions of the jewish people, communities and institutions of michigan.

—
3
The Greater Detroit Health Transition Company

Gdahc mission: together with our partners, we empower and improve the health and economic vitality of individuals, organizations and communities by catalyzing the power of collaboration. gdahc vision: healthy people. healthy community.…

—
4
The Michigan Glass Project
Public Benefit
5
Detroit Employment Solutions Corporation

The mission of desc is to cultivate local workforce talent to align with the needs of the business community through partnerships with key workforce agencies, faith- and community- based organizations, education and training institutions,…

Employment
6
Michigan Enviromental Council

Informing and educating the public and decision makers about environmental issues.

Environment
7
Detroiters Working for Environmental Justice

The organization is known as the leader in the movement and is seen as the "go to" experts on environmental justice and sustainable redevelopment because of its knowledge and its network.

Health
8
Detroit International Research and Education Foundation

Diref enchances cross-cultural understanding, develops contacts, and opens channels of communication for investment and other business activities by promoting, supporting, and administering educational and research programs in healthcare…

Health
9
Detroit Regional Chamber

The chamber is the voice for business and works to power the economy for southeast michigan through public policy, advocacy and leading regional economic development and talent initiatives.

—
10
The Jewish Fund

The jewish fund is organized and operates exclusively for charitable, educational, and religious purposes. the fund's primary activities are: supporting a jewish health care mission in the greater detroit area and michigan; promotion of…

Philanthropy
11
Michigan Club Squash
Recreation & Sports
12
Detroit Jazz Festival Foundation

To foster the history and nurture the development of jazz, to perpetuate detroit's significant jazz legacy through educational and collaborative opportunities accessible to all, and to present a world-class signature event that makes…

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jewish Family Service; the most unlike its peers is Friends of the Israel Defense Forces. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 28 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
8/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

LA SED (LATIN AMERICAN FOR SOCIAL & ECONOMIC DEV): $535,450 · OtherLA SED (LATIN AMERICAN FOR SOCIAL & ECONOMIC DEV)OTHER COLLEGES AND UNIVERSITIES: $282,642 · OtherOTHER COLLEGES AND UNIVERSITIESWAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY: $263,500 · OtherWAYNE STATE UNIVERSITYUNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN (ANN ARBOR & DEARBORN): $210,500 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN (ANN ARBOR & DEARBORN)DETROIT SYMPHONY AND METRO YOUTH ORCHESTRA: $199,100 · OtherDETROIT SYMPHONY AND METRO YOUTH ORCHESTRAMISC OTHER CHARITIES: $120,883 · OtherMISC OTHER CHARITIESDETROIT SYMPHONY & METRO YOUTH SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA: $105,000 · OtherDETROIT SYMPHONY & METRO YOUTH SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA+10 more: $212,645 · Other+10 moreDETROIT SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC: $55,000 · Arts & CultureTHE DETROIT INSTITUTE OF ARTS: $36,000 · Arts & CultureMICHIGAN JAZZ FESTIVAL: $15,000 · Arts & CultureGILDA'S CLUB METRO DETROIT: $15,000 · Arts & CultureDetroit Historical Society: $6,000 · Arts & CultureUNIVERSITY OF DETROIT MERCY: $74,000 · EducationMICHIGAN SCIENCE CENTER: $12,375 · EducationGESHER HUMAN SERVICES: $37,500 · EmploymentFRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES: $35,000 · InternationalST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $21,000 · HealthJEWISH FAMILY SERVICE: $7,500 · Human Services
Other$1,929,720Arts & Culture$127,000Education$86,375Employment$37,500International$35,000Health$21,000Human Services$7,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUNIVERSITY OF DETROIT MERCY: $74,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetDETROIT SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC: $55,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetGESHER HUMAN SERVICES: $37,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTHE DETROIT INSTITUTE OF ARTS: $36,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES: $35,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $21,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMICHIGAN JAZZ FESTIVAL: $15,000 over 3y, 8.6% of budgetGILDA'S CLUB METRO DETROIT: $15,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetMICHIGAN SCIENCE CENTER: $12,375 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY SERVICE: $7,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetDetroit Historical Society: $6,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetLATIN AMERICANS FOR SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT INC: $1,334 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF DETROIT MERCY ↗
  • Who funds DETROIT SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC ↗
  • Who funds GESHER HUMAN SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds THE DETROIT INSTITUTE OF ARTS ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds MICHIGAN JAZZ FESTIVAL ↗
  • Who funds GILDA'S CLUB METRO DETROIT ↗
  • Who funds MICHIGAN SCIENCE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE ↗
  • Who funds Detroit Historical Society ↗
  • Who funds LATIN AMERICANS FOR SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Lisa and Brian Meer FoundationMI13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Lisa and Brian Meer Foundation · The Driker Family Foundation · Donald R and Esther Simon Foundation · The Fred & Barbara Erb Family Foundation · Ford Philanthropy · DTE Energy Foundation · The Kresge Foundation · Community Foundation for Southeast Michigan · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Myron P Leven Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Myron P Leven Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 28 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Myron P Leven’s filings →

    More from the funding graph