Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Murrell Foundation

Its FY2026 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$316k
Granted FY2026still arriving
26
Grants FY2026still arriving
5
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Animals$241kPhilanthropy$116kEducation$93kHealth$78kHuman Services$71kYouth Development$60kArts & Culture$43kReligion$34kOther$0
02FY2026 · 26 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2026

  • Under $10k16 grants · $48k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $118k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $150k
$5,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$245k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UTSW MEDICAL CENTER$100,000
DALLAS MORNING NEWS CHARITIES$50,000
COMMUNITIES FOUNDATIONS OF TEXAS$36,000
UNIVERSITY OF DALLAS MEN'S BASKETBA$17,000
REDEMPTION BRIDGE$12,000
THOROUGHBRED RETIREMENT FOUNDATION$11,500
BACKSTRETCH EMPLOYEE SERVICE TEAM$11,000
BEYOND THE ROSES EQUINE RESCUE$10,000
ARMY A CLUB$10,000
WEST POINT ASSOCIATION OF GRADUATES$10,000
OURCALLING$7,500
HANNA'S SOUTHERN PAWS$5,000
HUMANE SOCIETY OF THE NEW BRAUNFELS$5,000
GRAPEVINE ANIMAL SERVICES$5,000
MARCH TO THE POLLS$4,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–26, $42k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%GUIDE DOGS OF TEXAS: $5k → 16%CAMP ABLE: $2k → 16%CAMP ABLE: $2k → 16%OURCALLING: $8k → 11%Community Partners of Dallas: $800 → 14%OUR CALLING: $5k → 14%CITYSQUARE: $2k → 14%COMMUNITY PARTNERS OF DALLAS: $3k → 14%MEALS ON WHEELS: $2k → 14%THE FAMILY PLACE: $5k → 14%THE FAMILY PLACE: $3k → 14%City Square: $3k → 14%GENESIS WOMEN'S SHELTER & SUPPORT: $5k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

VT
MI
NY
IA
OH
PA
NJ
CA
CO
MO
KY
MD
TN
DC
OK
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

75%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$809k · 49 repeat orgs$274k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +25% since the first grant, against +15% for those funded once.

49 repeat relationships: 18 still active in FY2026, 31 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2026 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

49
63

Total granted

$809k
$231k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+25%
+15%

Still filing today

67%
43%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2026, 84% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $44k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
AnimalsHuman ServicesEducationArts & CultureHealthPublic BenefitOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TR
    THOROUGHBRED RETIREMENT FOUNDATION INC
    5× · 2022–2026 · $32k · revenue +29%
  • DA
    DALLAS ARBORETUM AND BOTANICAL SOCIETY INC
    5× · 2019–2025 · $25k · revenue +45%
  • SR
    STANDARDBRED RETIREMENT FOUNDATION INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $24k · revenue +4%

Funded once

  • TD
    THE DALLAS MORNING NEWS EDUC LAB
    one grant, 2024 · $25k
  • TH
    THERAPEUTIC HORSES OF SARATOGA INC
    one grant, 2025 · $20k · revenue 0%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2025 · $20k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Texas Round Up Animal Alliance Inc

Adoption and shelter facility for unwanted, abandoned and neglected animals. provide aid to the community who need help with vetting or care of their animals.

Animals
2
One Tail At a Time West Texas

One tail at a time west texas otat wtx serves the rural communities of west texas by supporting animal shelter operations rescuing and sheltering homeless unwanted companion animals dogs and cats primarily arranging their veterinary care…

Animals
3
Dfw Humane Society of Irving Inc

Provide food, shelter and care for homeless, unwanted, pets. give pets a second chance by adoption. pay medical bills incoming injured animals, assist pet owners with free spay/neuter and medical appointments at veterinarians. educate thr…

Animals
4
Central Texas Animal Sanctuary

Animal rescue and rehabilitation

Animals
5
Laurels House

Laurel's House strengthens the human animal bond improves public health decreases the number of companion animal euthanasia due to overpopulation and diminishes human impact on native wildlife species by providing unprecedented access to…

—
6
Dfw Rescue Me Inc

Rescue dogs that have been abused, not cared for by owner or turned into the local animal control shelter

Animals
7
Central Texas Spca

Rescue neglected, unwanted homeless dogs and cats nurture and provide shelter until they are placed with a forever family strive to reduce animal overpopulation prevent cruelty to animals teach responsible pet ownership through an outreach…

Animals
8
Rockwall Adoption Center

To work with our community to strengthen the bond between animals and people, enhancing the quality of their lives through compassionate sheltering, responsible adoptions, education, and community outreach.

Animals
9
Dallas Street Dog Advocates

Dallas street dog advocates is committed to rescuing the stray and forgotten dogs off the streets of dallas, providing them with necessary medical care and training, and finding them permanent homes where they will be cared for the rest of…

Animals
10
The Dorset Equine Rescue Inc

To rescue, rehabilitate, and re-home abused, neglected and slaughter bound horses of all breads and sizes. To provide a safe, loving and rehabilitative home, including all needed medical care, to every incoming animal. Once ready for their…

Animals
11
The Humane Society of Austin & Travis County Inc

The austin humane society (ahs) offers comprehensive, humane, life-saving animal services, transforming the lives of animals and those who love them. because we believe homeless animals deserve a chance to thrive in a loving environment,…

Animals
12
Take Me Home Pet Rescue Inc

To rescue abandoned and abused animals and find permanent homes for them.

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Spca of Texas; the most unlike its peers is Animal Angels. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

67 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 67 of the 121 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
12
Early backer (in before they grew)
65/67
Grantees still filing
43/67
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UTSW MEDICAL CENTER: $147,100 · OtherUTSW MEDICAL CENTERArmy A Club: $46,600 · OtherArmy A ClubBEYOND THE ROSES EQUINE RESCUE: $31,900 · OtherTHE STEW POT: $27,500 · OtherTHE DALLAS MORNING NEWS EDUC LAB: $25,000 · OtherDALLAS ARBORETUM AND BOTANICAL SOCIETY INC: $25,000 · Other+74 more: $355,895 · Other+74 moreCOMMUNITIES FOUNDATION OF TEXAS INC: $104,800 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITIES FOUNDA…THE DALLAS MORNING NEWS CHARITIES: $83,000 · PhilanthropyTHE DALLAS MORNING…+2 more: $5,050 · PhilanthropyTHOROUGHBRED RETIREMENT FOUNDATION INC: $31,700 · AnimalsTHOROUGHBRED RETI…Beyond the Roses Equine Rescue and Retirement: $31,470 · AnimalsBeyond the Roses …Ranch Hands Rescue: $20,432 · AnimalsRanch Hands Rescu…THERAPEUTIC HORSES OF SARATOGA INC: $20,000 · AnimalsTHERAPEUTIC HORSE…Humane Society of North Texas: $13,000 · AnimalsHumane Society of…SPCA of Texas: $12,793 · AnimalsSPCA of TexasOMEGA HORSE RESCUE AND REHABILITATION CENTER INC: $12,750 · AnimalsOMEGA HORSE RESCU…PILOTS TO THE RESCUE INC: $12,500 · AnimalsPILOTS TO THE RES…RACE FUND INC: $10,650 · AnimalsRACE FUND INC+8 more: $13,950 · Animals+8 moreFRIENDS OF THE DALLAS PUBLIC LIBRARY INC: $15,000 · EducationArmy Scholarship Foundation Inc: $12,000 · EducationSouthern Methodist University: $10,100 · EducationTHE GEORGE W BUSH FOUNDATION: $10,000 · EducationThe Falcon Foundation: $5,000 · EducationGRANT HALLIBURTON FOUNDATION INC: $4,000 · EducationRhodes College: $3,750 · Education+1 more: $1,000 · EducationOURCALLING INC: $12,500 · Human ServicesThe Family Place: $7,500 · Human ServicesGENESIS WOMENS SHELTER & SUPPORT: $5,000 · Human ServicesCITYSQUARE: $4,500 · Human ServicesGuide Dogs of Texas Inc: $4,500 · Human ServicesAdvocates for Camp Able Camp Able of Buffalo Gap: $3,500 · Human ServicesCHILD PROTECTIVE SERVICES COMMUNITY PARTNERS INC: $3,300 · Human ServicesMEALS ON WHEELS: $1,500 · Human ServicesREDEMPTION BRIDGE: $29,500 · ReligionSTANDARDBRED RETIREMENT FOUNDATION INC: $23,775 · Civil RightsLONE STAR CASA INC: $5,000 · Civil Rights+1 more: $600 · Civil Rights
Other$658,995Philanthropy$192,850Animals$179,245Education$60,850Human Services$42,300Religion$29,500Civil Rights$29,375

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCOMMUNITIES FOUNDATION OF TEXAS INC: $104,800 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHOROUGHBRED RETIREMENT FOUNDATION INC: $31,700 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetBeyond the Roses Equine Rescue and Retirement: $31,470 over 4y, 11% of budgetREDEMPTION BRIDGE: $29,500 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetDALLAS ARBORETUM AND BOTANICAL SOCIETY INC: $25,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSTANDARDBRED RETIREMENT FOUNDATION INC: $23,775 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetPRESTON HOLLOW PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH FDN: $20,800 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetRanch Hands Rescue: $20,432 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetTHERAPEUTIC HORSES OF SARATOGA INC: $20,000 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE DALLAS PUBLIC LIBRARY INC: $15,000 over 6y, 0.8% of budgetASSOCIATION OF THE GRADUATES OF THE UNITED STATES MILITARY ACADEMY: $13,700 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetRAINBOW DAYS INC: $13,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetHumane Society of North Texas: $13,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSPCA of Texas: $12,793 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetOMEGA HORSE RESCUE AND REHABILITATION CENTER INC: $12,750 over 3y, 1.4% of budgetAMERICAN AIR MUSEUM IN BRITAIN: $12,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetPILOTS TO THE RESCUE INC: $12,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetOURCALLING INC: $12,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetArmy Scholarship Foundation Inc: $12,000 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetRACE FUND INC: $10,650 over 3y, 14% of budgetTEXAS WINDS MUSICAL OUTREACH INC: $10,500 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetSouthern Methodist University: $10,100 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDallas Holocaust and Human Rights Museum: $10,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE GEORGE W BUSH FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFOCUS ON TEENS: $9,000 over 3y, 1.9% of budgetThe Family Place: $7,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetOPERATION KINDNESS: $5,250 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFORT WORTH MUSEUM OF SCIENCE AND HISTORY: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetThe Falcon Foundation: $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetLONE STAR CASA INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetTHE DALLAS FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SUICIDE AND CRISIS CENTER OF NORTH TEXAS: $5,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetCITYSQUARE: $4,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGuide Dogs of Texas Inc: $4,500 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetGRANT HALLIBURTON FOUNDATION INC: $4,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetRhodes College: $3,750 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetTHE EXCELLER FUND INC: $3,600 over 2y, 0.8% of budget29 ACRES INC: $3,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetAdvocates for Camp Able Camp Able of Buffalo Gap: $3,500 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetCHILD PROTECTIVE SERVICES COMMUNITY PARTNERS INC: $3,300 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSENIOR CITIZENS OF GREATER DALLAS INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWreaths Across America: $1,945 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE FOXIE G FOUNDATION INC: $1,900 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS: $1,500 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetUNBRIDLED THOROUGHBRED FOUNDATION: $1,500 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetNORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetANIMAL WELFARE INSTITUTE: $800 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds COMMUNITIES FOUNDATION OF TEXAS INC ↗
  • Who funds THE DALLAS MORNING NEWS CHARITIES ↗
  • Who funds THOROUGHBRED RETIREMENT FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Beyond the Roses Equine Rescue and Retirement ↗
  • Who funds REDEMPTION BRIDGE ↗
  • Who funds DALLAS ARBORETUM AND BOTANICAL SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds STANDARDBRED RETIREMENT FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds PRESTON HOLLOW PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH FDN ↗
  • Who funds Ranch Hands Rescue ↗
  • Who funds THERAPEUTIC HORSES OF SARATOGA INC ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE DALLAS PUBLIC LIBRARY INC ↗
  • Who funds ASSOCIATION OF THE GRADUATES OF THE UNITED STATES MILITARY ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds RAINBOW DAYS INC ↗
  • Who funds Humane Society of North Texas ↗
  • Who funds SPCA of Texas ↗
  • Who funds OMEGA HORSE RESCUE AND REHABILITATION CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN AIR MUSEUM IN BRITAIN ↗
  • Who funds PILOTS TO THE RESCUE INC ↗
  • Who funds OURCALLING INC ↗
  • Who funds Army Scholarship Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds RACE FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds TEXAS WINDS MUSICAL OUTREACH INC ↗
  • Who funds Southern Methodist University ↗
  • Who funds Dallas Holocaust and Human Rights Museum ↗
  • Who funds THE GEORGE W BUSH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FOCUS ON TEENS ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Dallas FoundationTX28.7× affinity13 shared granteesties to 9 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Dallas Foundation · Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · Texas Instruments Foundation · Jl Williams Foundation Inc · Thoroughbred Aftercare Alliance Foundati Dba Thoroughbred Aftercare Alliance · The Rees-Jones Foundation · The Moody Foundation · W P & Bulah Luse Foundation · Community Foundation of North Texas (Tax · Celanese Foundation · Thoroughbred Charities of America Inc · The Perot Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Murrell Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Murrell Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    3get no government money at all
    16report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Murrell Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Murrell Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 121 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2026, released 2026. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Murrell’s filings →

    More from the funding graph