Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Muller Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1k
Granted FY2022
8
Grants FY2022
1
States reached
$300
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

100% of The Muller Foundation’s FY2024 grant dollars went to Woodside Community Foundation, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2024 names 0 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2022, the last year The Muller Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 6 organizations, $1k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

7
’17
6
’18
7
’19
5
’20
10
’21
6
’22
2
’23
0
’24

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Philanthropy$20kEnvironment$3kArts & Culture$3kReligion$885Public Benefit$725Health$600Education$410Human Services$200Other$0
02FY2022 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$100
Median grant
1
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WOODSIDE ATHERTON GARDEN CLUB$300
SFMOMA$150
FILOLI$100
PENINSULA VOLUNTEERS$100
PENINSULA OPEN SPACE TRUST$100
CANTOR MUSEUM$100
KQED$100
ECUMENICAL HUNGER PROGRAM$100
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–22, $200) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%PENINSULA VOLUNTEERS: $100 → 7%PENINSULA VOLUNTEERS: $100 → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$7k · 15 repeat orgs$1k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +37% since the first grant, against +20% for those funded once.

15 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2022, 7 since wound down. Read against FY2022, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
9

Total granted

$7k
$1k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+37%
+20%

Still filing today

47%
44%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
Arts & CultureEnvironmentHealthHuman ServicesFood & NutritionInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WG
    Woodside-Atherton Garden Club
    7× · 2017–2023 · $2k · revenue +51%
  • SF
    SAN FRANCISCO MUSEUM OF MODERN ART
    6× · 2017–2022 · $960 · revenue +37%
  • PO
    PENINSULA OPEN SPACE TRUST
    6× · 2017–2022 · $700 · revenue +164%

Funded once

  • American Diabetes Association
    one grant, 2017 · $200 · revenue -4%
  • P
    PVI
    one grant, 2019 · $200
  • TG
    THE GARDEN CLUB OF AMERICAgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $200 · revenue +49%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Oakland Museum of California

The museum's mission is to inspire all californians to create a more vibrant future for themselves and their communities. through collections, exhibitions, education programs, and public dialogue, we inspire people of all ages and…

Arts & Culture
2
San Diego Museum of Art

To inspire, educate and cultivate curiosity through great works of art.

Arts & Culture
3
Sonoma Botanical Garden
—
4
San Jose Museum of Art Association

Nurture empathy and connection by engaging communities with socially relevant contemporary art

Arts & Culture
5
American Museum of Natural History

The museum's mission statement is: "to discover, interpret, and disseminate - through scientific research and education - knowledge about human cultures, the natural world, and the universe."

Arts & Culture
6
Sempervirens Fund

To ensure coast redwood forests in the santa cruz mountains thrive for generations to come. since 1900, sempervirens has protected more than 36,000 acres. learn more about our mission, vision, and strategic plan through 2030 at:…

Environment
7
Metropolitan Museum of Art

The metropolitan museum of art collects, studies, conserves, and presents significant works of art across all times and cultures in order to connect people to creativity, knowledge, and ideas.

Arts & Culture
8
World Wildlife Fund Inc

Wwf's mission is to conserve nature and reduce the most pressing threats to the diversity of life on earth. (continued on schedule o)

Environment
9
Fairchild Tropical Botanic Garden Inc

We harness the power of plants for humankind and share the joy and beauty of tropical gardening with everyone. fairchild tropical botanic garden is a museum of tropical plants within a world famous, 83-acre designed landscape. it was…

Environment
10
Isabella Stewart Gardner Museum Inc

Organization's mission statement true to the ambitious vision of its founder and her spirit of creative risk-taking, the mission of the isabella stewart gardner museum is: - to bring to life and preserve the rich historic collection; - to…

Arts & Culture
11
Philadelphia Museum of Art

The philadelphia museum of art - in partnership with the city, the region, and art museums around the globe - seeks to preserve, enhance, interpret, and extend the reach of its great collection in particular, and the visual arts in…

Arts & Culture
12
Science Museum of Minnesota

The museum's mission statement is "turn on the science: inspire learning. inform policy. improve lives."

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Garden Club of America; the most unlike its peers is American Diabetes Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
11/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

WOODSIDE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $20,261 · PhilanthropyWOODSIDE COMMUNITY FOUNDATIONST DENIS PARISH: $785 · OtherST DENIS PARI…FILOLI: $415 · OtherFILOLISAN FRANCISCO SYMPHONY: $400 · OtherSAN FRANCISCO…MISSION HOSPICE: $400 · OtherMISSION HOSPI…BENEDICTINE FATHERS OF THE PRIORY: $350 · OtherBENEDICTINE F…CANTOR ARTS CENTER - STANFORD UNIVE: $200 · OtherCANTOR ARTS C…PVI: $200 · OtherPVICANTOR MUSEUM: $200 · OtherCANTOR MUSEUMGOLDEN GATE LABRADOR RETRIEVER RESC: $150 · Other+7 more: $480 · Other+7 moreWoodside-Atherton Garden Club: $2,100 · EnvironmentWoodside-At…PENINSULA OPEN SPACE TRUST: $700 · EnvironmentPENINSULA O…THE GARDEN CLUB OF AMERICA: $200 · EnvironmentTHE GARDEN …SAN FRANCISCO MUSEUM OF MODERN ART: $960 · Arts & CultureKQED INC: $330 · Arts & CultureCORPORATION OF THE FINE ARTS MUSEUMS: $218 · Arts & CultureASIAN ART MUSEUM FOUNDATION OF SAN FRANCISCO: $100 · Arts & CultureAmerican Diabetes Association: $200 · HealthPENINSULA VOLUNTEERS INC: $200 · Human ServicesECUMENICAL HUNGER PROGRAM: $150 · Food & Nutrition
Philanthropy$20,261Other$3,580Environment$3,000Arts & Culture$1,608Health$200Human Services$200Food & Nutrition$150

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWOODSIDE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $20,261 over 1y, 17% of budgetWoodside-Atherton Garden Club: $2,100 over 7y, 0.5% of budgetSAN FRANCISCO MUSEUM OF MODERN ART: $960 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetPENINSULA OPEN SPACE TRUST: $700 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetKQED INC: $330 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCORPORATION OF THE FINE ARTS MUSEUMS: $218 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPENINSULA VOLUNTEERS INC: $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetECUMENICAL HUNGER PROGRAM: $150 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetASIAN ART MUSEUM FOUNDATION OF SAN FRANCISCO: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $60 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $40 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $15 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds WOODSIDE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Woodside-Atherton Garden Club ↗
  • Who funds SAN FRANCISCO MUSEUM OF MODERN ART ↗
  • Who funds PENINSULA OPEN SPACE TRUST ↗
  • Who funds KQED INC ↗
  • Who funds CORPORATION OF THE FINE ARTS MUSEUMS ↗
  • Who funds American Diabetes Association ↗
  • Who funds THE GARDEN CLUB OF AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds PENINSULA VOLUNTEERS INC ↗
  • Who funds ECUMENICAL HUNGER PROGRAM ↗
  • Who funds ASIAN ART MUSEUM FOUNDATION OF SAN FRANCISCO ↗
  • Who funds THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Silicon Valley Community FoundationCA14.2× affinity5 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Muller Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Muller Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Muller’s filings →

    More from the funding graph