Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Mulhollem Cravens Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$536k
Granted FY2025still arriving
23
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$660kEducation$570kFood & Nutrition$345kHuman Services$254kHealth$238kReligion$187kHousing & Shelter$140kAnimals$113kOther$0
02FY2025 · 23 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k11 grants · $46k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $175k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $315k
$10,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$1.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CARNEGIE CENTER$100,000
LEXINGTON KY RESCUE MISSION$100,000
KY FFA FOUNDATION$65,000
THE HOPE CENTER$50,000
KET-KY PBS STATION$35,000
BOURBON CO KY YMCA$25,000
THE KENTUCKY AGRICULTURAL LEADERSHIP PROGRAM$25,000
NICHOLAS CO HISTORICAL SOC$25,000
NICHOLAS COUNTY KY TOURISM BOARD$25,000
CROSSROADS SHELTER$20,000
UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY$10,000
UK-GOODIN FUND$10,000
NICHOLAS COUNTY FAMILY RESOURCE AND YOUTH SERVICES CENTER$7,500
NICHOLAS CO KY FFA$7,500
OPERATION FOOD BASKET$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–23, $126k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%PARIS-BOURBON COUNTY YMCA: $25k → 17%LEXINGTON RESCUE MISSION: $100k → 15%ITN BLUE GRASS: $500 → 15%ITN BLUE GRASS: $500 → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 97% of The Mulhollem Cravens Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 82% of the giving stays in KY; by stated purpose, 5%.

The Mulhollem Cravens Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

65%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.8M · 25 repeat orgs$954k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +72% since the first grant, against +14% for those funded once.

25 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2025, 14 since wound down; 12 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

25
34

Total granted

$1.8M
$767k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+72%
+14%

Still filing today

16%
38%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 65% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $188k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureHuman ServicesHousing & ShelterEnvironmentInternationalAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TH
    THE HOPE CENTER INC
    4× · 2021–2025 · $235k · revenue +72%
  • TL
    TREES LEXINGTON
    3× · 2021–2023 · $6k · revenue +274%
  • II
    ITNBLUEGRASS INC
    2× · 2020–2021 · $1k · revenue +52%

Funded once

  • LR
    LEXINGTON RESCUE MISSION
    one grant, 2023 · $100k · revenue +22%
  • LC
    LEXINGTON CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOL BUILDING FUND
    one grant, 2020 · $100k
  • NC
    NICHOLAS COUNTY FISCAL COURT
    one grant, 2021 · $75k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Feeding America Kentucky's Heartland Inc

To serve those in need by acquiring and distributing food, grocery items, and government commodities through a network of charitable partnering agencies in 42 kentucky counties.

Food & Nutrition
2
Feeding Kentucky Inc

To end hunger in collaboration with kentucky's feeding america food banks and partners, through advocacy and resource development.

Food & Nutrition
3
Kentucky Center for Agriculture and Rural Development Inc

Facilitate agricultural and rural business development in kentucky by 1) providing leadership, educational, technical and financial resources and 2) improving the economic conditions of rural kentucky through promoting development of new…

Food & Nutrition
4
Louisville Community Food Pantry Inc

The Louisville Community Food Pantry, Inc. is a non-profit organization providing supplemental groceries to families and individuals in Jefferson County who are in need. We provide food in a way that supports and sustains the dignity of…

Food & Nutrition
5
Lexington Public Library

Our mission is to enrich and connect our community through welcoming spaces, engaged staff, diverse resources, and lifelong learning opportunities. we create a stronger community by meeting our customers where and how they need us and…

Education
6
Kentucky Harvest Inc

Kentucky harvest's purpose is to end local hunger by connecting with food donors and engaging volunteers to rescue excess food and move it from those who have it to those in need.

Food & Nutrition
7
Kentucky Farm Bureau Insurance Foundation

To support those in need and improve the quality of life throughout the commonwealth of kentucky.

Education
8
Nashville Food Project Inc

The nashville food project brings people together to grow, cook, and share nourishing food, with the goals of cultivating community and alleviating hunger in our city.

Food & Nutrition
9
Commerce Lexington Inc

To represent our members, creating the environment and opportunity for economic prosperity and quality living in central kentucky.

—
10
Kentucky Blood Center Inc

At kentucky blood center, our mission is to ensure a safe and abundant supply of lifegiving blood to the hospitals we serve. we are here to support our local communities in any way that we are able by being an integral and valued partner…

Health
11
Community Agricultural and Nutritional Enterprises Inc

Increase agricultural footprint in letcher co ky and surrounding counties; establish permanent outlet for local farm products and creation of value added products; access to healthy local food; gain skills in preparing foods; offering of…

Food & Nutrition
12
Baptist Healthcare System Inc

The mission of Baptist Health is to exemplify our Christian heritage of providing quality healthcare services by enhancing the physical & emotional health of the people & communities we serve, guided by integrity, respect, stewardship,…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is God's Pantry Food Bank Inc; the most unlike its peers is Carlisle-Nicholas Co Tourism Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 71 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/20
Grantees still filing
13/20
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA: $400,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTAIndividual grant recipient: $305,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCARNEGIE CENTER: $230,000 · OtherCARNEGIE CENTERBOURBON CO KY YMCA: $100,000 · OtherLEXINGTON KY RESCUE MISSION: $100,000 · OtherLEXINGTON CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOL BUILDING FUND: $100,000 · OtherKET-KY PBS STATION: $97,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY: $85,000 · OtherCROSSROADS SHELTER: $80,000 · Other+48 more: $835,000 · Other+48 moreTHE HOPE CENTER INC: $235,000 · Housing & ShelterTHE HOPE C…CROSSROADS INC: $15,000 · Housing & ShelterCROSSROADS…LEXINGTON RESCUE MISSION: $100,000 · Human ServicesYOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF PARIS BOURBON COUNTY INC: $25,000 · Human Services+1 more: $1,000 · Human ServicesCOMMONWEALTH FUND FOR KET INC: $15,000 · Arts & CultureTHE LIVING ARTS & SCIENCE CENTER INC: $10,000 · Arts & CultureLYRIC THEATRE & CULTURAL ARTS CENTER: $5,000 · Arts & CultureAPPALACHIAN ARTISAN CENTER INC: $5,000 · Arts & CultureNORTH DAKOTA MUSEUM OF ART: $2,500 · Arts & CultureINTERNATIONAL BOOK PROJECT INC: $10,000 · InternationalTREES LEXINGTON: $5,500 · EnvironmentNATIONAL ARBOR DAY FOUNDATION: $900 · EnvironmentPARIS ANIMAL WELFARE SOCIETY INC: $2,500 · Animals
Other$2,332,000Housing & Shelter$250,000Human Services$126,000Arts & Culture$37,500International$10,000Environment$6,400Animals$2,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE HOPE CENTER INC: $235,000 over 4y, 1.3% of budgetLEXINGTON RESCUE MISSION: $100,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetYOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF PARIS BOURBON COUNTY INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetCROSSROADS INC: $15,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetCOMMONWEALTH FUND FOR KET INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetINTERNATIONAL BOOK PROJECT INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTHE LIVING ARTS & SCIENCE CENTER INC: $10,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetTREES LEXINGTON: $5,500 over 3y, 3.1% of budgetLYRIC THEATRE & CULTURAL ARTS CENTER: $5,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetAPPALACHIAN ARTISAN CENTER INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetOPERATION FOOD BASKET INC: $5,000 over 1y, 8.3% of budgetGOD'S PANTRY FOOD BANK INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNORTH DAKOTA MUSEUM OF ART: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPARIS ANIMAL WELFARE SOCIETY INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetCENTRAL KENTUCKY RIDING FOR HOPE INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetSeedleaf Inc: $2,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetITNBLUEGRASS INC: $1,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetGLEAN KENTUCKY INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNATIONAL ARBOR DAY FOUNDATION: $900 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE HOPE CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds LEXINGTON RESCUE MISSION ↗
  • Who funds YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF PARIS BOURBON COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds CARLISLE-NICHOLAS CO TOURISM INC ↗
  • Who funds CROSSROADS INC ↗
  • Who funds COMMONWEALTH FUND FOR KET INC ↗
  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL BOOK PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds THE LIVING ARTS & SCIENCE CENTER INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Blue Grass Community Foundation IncKY31.7× affinity13 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Blue Grass Community Foundation Inc · Honorable Order of Kentucky Colonels Inc · LG&E and Ku Foundation Inc · American Water Charitable Foundationinc · Crutcher Family Foundation Inc · Hilary Boone Foundation Inc · Elhapa Foundation Inc · Nisource Charitable Foundation · Keeneland Foundation Inc · The King's Daughters and Sons Foundation of Kentucky Inc · United Way of the Bluegrass Inc · Snowy Owl Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Mulhollem Cravens Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Mulhollem Cravens Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 71 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Mulhollem Cravens’ filings →

    More from the funding graph