Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Muck Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$22k
Granted FY2024still arriving
4
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What you fund
0197% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Education$185kHealth$118kEnvironment$19kRecreation & Sports$18kHousing & Shelter$10kYouth Development$10kPublic Benefit$8kArts & Culture$7kOther$0
02FY2024 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k2 grants · $2k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $20k
$10,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$947k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UPMC CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION$10,000
THE PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY$10,000
DFI EDUCATIONAL TRUST$1,000
LAWRENCE COUNTY YOUNG GUNS$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–22, $47k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 98% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%HEALTHNETWORK FOUNDATION: $10k → 17%AGC CHARITIES: $1k → 7%LIGHT OF LIFE RESCUE MISSION: $5k → 11%HEALTHNETWORK FOUNDATION: $5k → 17%HEALTHNETWORK FOUNDATION: $5k → 17%HEALTHNETWORK FOUNDATION: $10k → 17%LIGHT OF LIFE RESCUE MISSION: $500 → 11%URBAN IMPACT FOUNDATION: $1k → 11%THE WOODLANDS FOUNDATION: $5k → 11%THE WOODLANDS FOUNDATION: $500 → 11%CENTER OF LIFE: $4k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

IL
NY
MA
OH
PA
NJ
VA
MD
NC
MS

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$366k · 15 repeat orgs$54k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +60% since the first grant, against +43% for the ones you funded once.

15 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2024, 13 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
29

Total granted

$366k
$52k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+60%
+43%

Still filing today

73%
38%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesHealthHousing & ShelterEnvironmentEducationFood & NutritionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • The Ohio University Foundation
    2× · 2022–2023 · $106k · revenue +23%
  • AM
    ABIDING MISSIONS
    3× · 2018–2020 · $35k · revenue +172%
  • HEALTHNETWORK FOUNDATION FKA HEALTH NET FOUNDATION INC
    4× · 2017–2022 · $30k · revenue +229%

Funded once

  • PS
    PITTSBURGH SCHWEITZER FELLOWS PROGRAM
    one grant, 2020 · $7k
  • LO
    LIGHT OF LIFE MINISTRIES INC
    one grant, 2022 · $6k · revenue -16%
  • BV
    BLIND & VISION REHABILITATION SERVICES
    one grant, 2020 · $5k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Wrc Pennsylvania Memorial Home

Wrc pennsylvania memorial home's mission is to provide choices for generations. built on a not-for-profit foundation of caring, the organization offers residential and personal care, home and community-based services, skilled and…

Health
2
Clearfield Hospital

To provide the community with exceptional care through our community-based health system while maintaining a reverence for life.

3
Riverlife

Riverlife's mission is to create, activate, and celebrate pittsburgh's riverfronts, connecting people through exceptional places and experiences.

Environment
4
Parkinson's Foundation Inc

Make life better for people with parkinson's disease by improving care and advancing research toward a cure.

Health
5
Wayne Memorial Hospital

It is the mission of wayne memorial hospital to provide quality healthcare with compassion, advocacy, respect, excellence, and service; to promote wellness in our community; and to be proactive in responding to our community's needs.

Health
6
Chambersburg Hospital

The chambersburg hospital is a regional non-profit health care organization committed to the improvement of the health and well-being of the people in southcentral pennsylvania.

Health
7
Lancaster General Health Foundation

The lancaster general health foundation is organized and operated to benefit, perform the functions of, or carry out the purposes of members of the healthcare system of lancaster general health, a non-profit corporation described in…

Philanthropy
8
Western Pennsylvania Conservancy

The western pennsylvania conservancy protects and restores exceptional places to provide our region with clean waters and healthy forests, wildlife and natural areas for the benefit of present and future generations. the conservancy…

Environment
9
Highlands Hospital

Highlands hospital is committed to providing health care to the community in a competent, nurturing and healing environment. our staff will provide support in times of crisis and furnish the resources necessary to promote a healthy…

Health
10
American Kennel Club Canine Health Foundation

The mission of the akc canine health foundation, inc. is to fund, advance, and communicate canine health research and science through knowledge and discovery.

Animals
11
Personal Care Products Council Foundation Inc

The foundation is set up to deliver one program - look good feel better. the mission of this nationwide program is to improve the quality of life of women, men, and teens undergoing cancer treatment by offering advice on how to cope with…

Health
12
Highmark Health Group

Working as an integrated system within highmark health, employees at all of ahn's care sites, including hospitals, health + wellness pavilions, primary and specialty care offices and more, are committed to improving health and promoting…

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Allegheny County Parks Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Premo J Pappafava Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyRegional Heritage & Agricul…Hunting & Fishing ClubsAnimal Rescue and AdoptionFood Assistance & Basic Nee…Pittsburgh Community Develo…Senior Affordable HousingSupportive Housing & Recove…Jewish Federation FundersFamily FoundationsHealthcare System Foundatio…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 25 years old; the field is 19. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number18%8%<5yr13%12%5–10yr19%19%10–20yr17%35%20–35yr15%12%35–55yr17%15%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value18%3%<5yr13%13%5–10yr19%7%10–20yr17%31%20–35yr15%7%35–55yr17%39%55yr+

The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 8% of your grantees by number, and just 3% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 9% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/27
the rest of the field
9%
7,129/78,135

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

25 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 25 of the 46 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
23/25
Grantees still filing
16/25
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

THE PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY — $50,000 · OtherTHE PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITYIndividual grant recipient — $25,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientEVANS SCHOLARS FOUNDATION — $8,500 · OtherEVANS SCHOLARS FOUNDATIONMORAINE TRAILS COUNCIL BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA — $8,000 · OtherMORAINE TRAILS COUNCIL BOY SCOUTS OF…PITTSBURGH SCHWEITZER FELLOWS PROGRAM — $6,750 · OtherPENNSYLVANIA TROLLEY MUSEUM INC — $5,000 · OtherBLIND & VISION REHABILITATION SERVICES — $5,000 · OtherBROOKFIELD POWER US ASSET MANAGEMENT LLC — $5,000 · Other+21 more — $22,100 · Other+21 moreThe Ohio University Foundation — $105,500 · EducationThe Ohio University Foundati…ABIDING MISSIONS — $34,600 · HealthABIDING MISSIONSCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PITTSBURGH FOUNDATION — $20,000 · HealthCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL …CLEAR THOUGHTS FOUNDATION — $18,000 · HealthCLEAR THOUGHTS FOUND…+3 more — $4,000 · HealthHEALTHNETWORK FOUNDATION FKA HEALTH NET FOUNDATION INC — $30,000 · Human ServicesHEALTHNETWOR…WOODLANDS FOUNDATION INC — $5,500 · Human ServicesWOODLANDS FO…LIGHT OF LIFE MINISTRIES INC — $5,500 · Human ServicesLIGHT OF LIF…CENTER OF LIFE — $4,000 · Human ServicesCENTER OF LI…+2 more — $2,000 · Human ServicesAmerican Whitewater — $18,500 · EnvironmentARMSTRONG TRAILS INC — $8,500 · EnvironmentKNOCH KNIGHTS LEGACIES FOUNDATION — $22,000 · PhilanthropyTROOPS FIRST FOUNDATION INCORPORATED — $7,000 · Public Benefit
Other$135,350Education$105,500Health$76,600Human Services$47,000Environment$27,000Philanthropy$22,000Public Benefit$7,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetThe Ohio University Foundation — $105,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetHEALTHNETWORK FOUNDATION FKA HEALTH NET FOUNDATION INC — $30,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetKNOCH KNIGHTS LEGACIES FOUNDATION — $22,000 over 5y, 4.5% of budgetCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PITTSBURGH FOUNDATION — $20,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Whitewater — $18,500 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetCLEAR THOUGHTS FOUNDATION — $18,000 over 4y, 4.3% of budgetARMSTRONG TRAILS INC — $8,500 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetTROOPS FIRST FOUNDATION INCORPORATED — $7,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetLIGHT OF LIFE MINISTRIES INC — $5,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPENNSYLVANIA TROLLEY MUSEUM INC — $5,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCENTER OF LIFE — $4,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOUR OWN HOME — $2,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetALLEGHENY COUNTY PARKS FOUNDATION — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBUTLER MEALS ON WHEELS INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetEPILEPSY ASSOCIATION OF WESTERN AND CENTRAL PA — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLAWRENCE COUNTY YOUNG GUNS — $1,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetURBAN IMPACT FOUNDATION — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHUMANE SOCIETY OF SOMERSET COUNTY — $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetAGC CHARITIES INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetNATIONAL PANCREAS FOUNDATION — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPREMO J PAPPAFAVA FOUNDATION — $500 over 1y, 4.7% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Pittsburgh FoundationPA23.8× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Pittsburgh Foundation · The United Way of Southwestern Pennsylvania · Eqt Foundation · The Jack Buncher Foundation · Richard King Mellon Foundation · Hillman Family Foundations · Philip & Patricia Muck Charitable Foundation · The Grable Foundation · Community Foundation of Greater Johnstown · The Heinz Endowments · Upmc Group · Baird Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Muck Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 5%
  • American Whitewater5% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Muck Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Muck Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 46 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph